Outcome of Embolization of an Endoleak Type 2 After Placement of an Endoprosthesis for an Infrarenal Aorta Aneurysm.

IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Mattice Steenbeke, Nathalie Moreels, Frank Vermassen, Peter Vanlangenhove, Laurens Hermie, Elisabeth Dhondt, Lynn Huyck, Luc Defreyne
{"title":"Outcome of Embolization of an Endoleak Type 2 After Placement of an Endoprosthesis for an Infrarenal Aorta Aneurysm.","authors":"Mattice Steenbeke, Nathalie Moreels, Frank Vermassen, Peter Vanlangenhove, Laurens Hermie, Elisabeth Dhondt, Lynn Huyck, Luc Defreyne","doi":"10.1177/15266028251363477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of transarterial (TA) and translumbar (TL) embolization of a type 2 endoleak (T2EL) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) on the evolution and rupture of the aneurysmal sac.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted including patients who underwent TA or TL embolization for a growing T2EL after EVAR from April 2001 to August 2022. Demographic data, used endograft, radiological data of the AAA and T2EL, embolization agents, techniques (TA or TL approach), and angiographical outcomes were collected from 48 patients with a total of 58 embolizations. The primary clinical outcome was rupture of the AAA. Secondary outcomes included T2EL recurrence, re-embolization of T2EL, aneurysm sac growth (≥5 mm), and mortality. Clinical success was defined as the absence of a 5 mm or greater increase in the aneurysm sac diameter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After primary T2EL embolizations, an increase in aneurysm sac was seen in 56.5% (n = 26), stability in 30.4% (n = 14), and regression in 13.0% (n = 6). Recurrence of T2EL had a significant impact on clinical success. No difference in sac size or evolution after the TA and TL embolization was noted. Rupture was found in 4 patients, but in only 1 patient it was caused by an isolated T2EL. The effect of increase in aneurysm sac size on overall survival was not statistically significant. Additionally, no associations were observed between the outcome and clinical factors including gender, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, smoking, technique, used embolic agents, and time from endoleak onset to embolization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this retrospective study, 1 AAA rupture was attributable to an isolated T2EL out of 48 patients, with a clinical success rate of 43.5%.Clinical ImpactAlthough the impact of a type 2 endoleak (T2EL) on the outcome of an endovascular repaired abdominal aortic aneurysm is not yet clarified, in daily practice, the endovascular embolization is considered as a safe and effective option. Elimination or reduction of the volume of the endoleak can be obtained and can probably prevent aortic rupture, which is reassuring for the treating physician and the patient. The embolization of the T2EL reduces the need for extra imaging or hospitalizations, lowers the risk of complications and minimizes healthcare costs. This study contributes to the knowledge and treatment of T2EL, supporting clinicians in making better informed decisions, ultimately optimizing patient care. Moreover, this research found no outcome differences between the embolization techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251363477"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251363477","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of transarterial (TA) and translumbar (TL) embolization of a type 2 endoleak (T2EL) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) on the evolution and rupture of the aneurysmal sac.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted including patients who underwent TA or TL embolization for a growing T2EL after EVAR from April 2001 to August 2022. Demographic data, used endograft, radiological data of the AAA and T2EL, embolization agents, techniques (TA or TL approach), and angiographical outcomes were collected from 48 patients with a total of 58 embolizations. The primary clinical outcome was rupture of the AAA. Secondary outcomes included T2EL recurrence, re-embolization of T2EL, aneurysm sac growth (≥5 mm), and mortality. Clinical success was defined as the absence of a 5 mm or greater increase in the aneurysm sac diameter.

Results: After primary T2EL embolizations, an increase in aneurysm sac was seen in 56.5% (n = 26), stability in 30.4% (n = 14), and regression in 13.0% (n = 6). Recurrence of T2EL had a significant impact on clinical success. No difference in sac size or evolution after the TA and TL embolization was noted. Rupture was found in 4 patients, but in only 1 patient it was caused by an isolated T2EL. The effect of increase in aneurysm sac size on overall survival was not statistically significant. Additionally, no associations were observed between the outcome and clinical factors including gender, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, smoking, technique, used embolic agents, and time from endoleak onset to embolization.

Conclusion: In this retrospective study, 1 AAA rupture was attributable to an isolated T2EL out of 48 patients, with a clinical success rate of 43.5%.Clinical ImpactAlthough the impact of a type 2 endoleak (T2EL) on the outcome of an endovascular repaired abdominal aortic aneurysm is not yet clarified, in daily practice, the endovascular embolization is considered as a safe and effective option. Elimination or reduction of the volume of the endoleak can be obtained and can probably prevent aortic rupture, which is reassuring for the treating physician and the patient. The embolization of the T2EL reduces the need for extra imaging or hospitalizations, lowers the risk of complications and minimizes healthcare costs. This study contributes to the knowledge and treatment of T2EL, supporting clinicians in making better informed decisions, ultimately optimizing patient care. Moreover, this research found no outcome differences between the embolization techniques.

肾下动脉瘤置换术后2型内漏栓塞的结果。
目的:探讨经动脉(TA)和经腰椎(TL)栓塞治疗肾下腹主动脉瘤(AAA)血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)后2型内漏(T2EL)对动脉瘤囊演变和破裂的影响。方法:回顾性研究包括2001年4月至2022年8月期间接受TA或TL栓塞治疗EVAR后不断增长的T2EL的患者。我们收集了48例共58次栓塞的患者的人口学资料、使用的内移植物、AAA和T2EL的影像学资料、栓塞剂、技术(TA或TL入路)和血管造影结果。主要临床结果是AAA破裂,次要结果包括T2EL复发、T2EL再栓塞、动脉瘤囊生长(≥5mm)和死亡率。临床成功的定义是动脉瘤囊直径没有增加5mm或更大。结果:原发性T2EL栓塞后,动脉瘤囊增加56.5% (n = 26),稳定30.4% (n = 14),消退13.0% (n = 6)。T2EL复发对临床成功有显著影响。TA和TL栓塞后囊的大小和演变没有差异。4例患者出现破裂,但只有1例患者是由孤立的T2EL引起的。动脉瘤囊增大对总生存率的影响无统计学意义。此外,没有观察到结果与临床因素之间的关联,包括性别、肥胖、慢性阻塞性肺病、糖尿病、高血压、高胆固醇血症、吸烟、技术、使用的栓塞剂和从内漏发生到栓塞的时间。结论:在本回顾性研究中,48例患者中有1例AAA破裂可归因于孤立的T2EL,临床成功率为43.5%。临床影响虽然2型内漏(T2EL)对血管内修复腹主动脉瘤预后的影响尚不清楚,但在日常实践中,血管内栓塞被认为是一种安全有效的选择。消除或减少内漏的体积可以获得,并可能防止主动脉破裂,这对治疗医生和患者都是令人放心的。T2EL的栓塞减少了额外成像或住院治疗的需要,降低了并发症的风险,并最大限度地降低了医疗成本。本研究有助于对T2EL的认识和治疗,支持临床医生做出更明智的决策,最终优化患者护理。此外,本研究发现栓塞技术之间没有结果差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信