Kiran McCloskey, Gari Leigh Adams, Paula Bird, Keith Murphy
{"title":"Use of the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression Tool to Predict Violence in the Emergency Department and Other Acute Care Settings.","authors":"Kiran McCloskey, Gari Leigh Adams, Paula Bird, Keith Murphy","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2025.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Few violence risk assessment instruments have been validated for use among the general population in the emergency department or subsequent acute care settings. This study evaluated the predictive validity of the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression tool for use with the general population in these settings.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression was implemented for all emergency department and acute care admissions within a large health care system in North Carolina in July 2022. A retrospective analysis was conducted with all encounters with individuals aged 18 years or older who were discharged from March 1, 2023 to May 31, 2023. Area under the curve scores from a receiver operating characteristic curve were used to assess the validity of the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression in predicting the risk of future aggressive incidents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 91,951 encounters were included for analysis, of which 90.57% initially presented to the emergency department. The area under the curve of the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression in predicting an aggressive incident was .63.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression had moderate predictive validity for future incidents of violence when used for the general population in the emergency department and other acute care settings. Future research might assess whether reduced clinical variation may increase the validity of the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression for these settings. Presently, hospitals should consider alternative tools for reducing the incidence of violence in the emergency department.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2025.07.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Few violence risk assessment instruments have been validated for use among the general population in the emergency department or subsequent acute care settings. This study evaluated the predictive validity of the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression tool for use with the general population in these settings.
Method: The Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression was implemented for all emergency department and acute care admissions within a large health care system in North Carolina in July 2022. A retrospective analysis was conducted with all encounters with individuals aged 18 years or older who were discharged from March 1, 2023 to May 31, 2023. Area under the curve scores from a receiver operating characteristic curve were used to assess the validity of the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression in predicting the risk of future aggressive incidents.
Results: A total of 91,951 encounters were included for analysis, of which 90.57% initially presented to the emergency department. The area under the curve of the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression in predicting an aggressive incident was .63.
Discussion: The Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression had moderate predictive validity for future incidents of violence when used for the general population in the emergency department and other acute care settings. Future research might assess whether reduced clinical variation may increase the validity of the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression for these settings. Presently, hospitals should consider alternative tools for reducing the incidence of violence in the emergency department.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice.
The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics.
The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.