Effect of a Walking Plus Education Program on the Duration and Severity of Recurrences of Low Back Pain: A Secondary Exploratory Analysis of the WalkBack Trial.

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Natasha C Pocovi, Petra L Graham, Ambrose Adelaide, Gokul Pisharody, Chung-Wei Christine Lin, Simon D French, Christopher G Maher, Johanna M van Dongen, Jane Latimer, Dafna Merom, Anne Tiedemann, Shuk Yin Kate Tong, Mark J Hancock
{"title":"Effect of a Walking Plus Education Program on the Duration and Severity of Recurrences of Low Back Pain: A Secondary Exploratory Analysis of the WalkBack Trial.","authors":"Natasha C Pocovi, Petra L Graham, Ambrose Adelaide, Gokul Pisharody, Chung-Wei Christine Lin, Simon D French, Christopher G Maher, Johanna M van Dongen, Jane Latimer, Dafna Merom, Anne Tiedemann, Shuk Yin Kate Tong, Mark J Hancock","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2025.13361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To explore the effect of the WalkBack intervention on the duration and severity of low back pain in participants who reported a recurrence. <b>DESIGN:</b> Secondary exploratory analysis of the WalkBack randomized controlled trial. <b>METHODS:</b> The WalkBack trial compared an individualized and progressive walking plus education program delivered by physiotherapists, to a no-treatment control group for preventing new recurrences of low back pain. In this study, we analyzed the first recurrence of low back pain (n = 596). The primary outcome for this analysis was the duration of the recurrence (time to recovery in days). The secondary outcomes were the level of interference with daily activity caused by the recurrence, and pain intensity (average and worst). Survival analysis, linear, and ordinal regression were used to compare outcomes between groups. <b>RESULTS:</b> Walking plus education was associated with a shorter duration of pain recurrence compared to control: median time to recovery 3 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3, 4) versus 4 days (95% CI: 4, 5); hazard ratio 1.30 (95% CI: 1.10, 1.53; <i>P</i> = .002). There was no between-group difference in interference with daily activity or average pain intensity. The intervention group reported lower worst pain intensity on average than the control group (-0.34 on a numerical pain-rating scale from 0 to 10; 95% CI: -0.65, -0.03; <i>P</i> = .03). <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Participants who received a tailored and progressive walking plus education program reported shorter and milder back pain recurrences than participants in the control group. However, the benefits were small and of uncertain clinical relevance. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(9):1-6. Epub 6 August 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13361</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 9","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2025.13361","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of the WalkBack intervention on the duration and severity of low back pain in participants who reported a recurrence. DESIGN: Secondary exploratory analysis of the WalkBack randomized controlled trial. METHODS: The WalkBack trial compared an individualized and progressive walking plus education program delivered by physiotherapists, to a no-treatment control group for preventing new recurrences of low back pain. In this study, we analyzed the first recurrence of low back pain (n = 596). The primary outcome for this analysis was the duration of the recurrence (time to recovery in days). The secondary outcomes were the level of interference with daily activity caused by the recurrence, and pain intensity (average and worst). Survival analysis, linear, and ordinal regression were used to compare outcomes between groups. RESULTS: Walking plus education was associated with a shorter duration of pain recurrence compared to control: median time to recovery 3 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3, 4) versus 4 days (95% CI: 4, 5); hazard ratio 1.30 (95% CI: 1.10, 1.53; P = .002). There was no between-group difference in interference with daily activity or average pain intensity. The intervention group reported lower worst pain intensity on average than the control group (-0.34 on a numerical pain-rating scale from 0 to 10; 95% CI: -0.65, -0.03; P = .03). CONCLUSION: Participants who received a tailored and progressive walking plus education program reported shorter and milder back pain recurrences than participants in the control group. However, the benefits were small and of uncertain clinical relevance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(9):1-6. Epub 6 August 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13361.

步行加教育计划对腰痛复发持续时间和严重程度的影响:对步行试验的二次探索性分析。
目的:探讨WalkBack干预对报告复发的参与者腰痛持续时间和严重程度的影响。设计:对WalkBack随机对照试验进行二次探索性分析。方法:WalkBack试验比较了由物理治疗师提供的个体化渐进式步行加教育计划和无治疗对照组,以预防新的腰痛复发。在这项研究中,我们分析了腰痛的首次复发(n = 596)。该分析的主要结局是复发的持续时间(以天为单位的恢复时间)。次要结局是复发引起的对日常活动的干扰程度和疼痛强度(平均和最差)。采用生存分析、线性回归和有序回归来比较组间结果。结果:与对照组相比,步行加教育与更短的疼痛复发时间相关:中位恢复时间为3天(95%置信区间[CI]: 3,4)对4天(95% CI: 4,5);风险比1.30 (95% CI: 1.10, 1.53; P = 0.002)。在日常活动干扰或平均疼痛强度方面,组间无差异。干预组报告的最严重疼痛强度平均低于对照组(0至10的数值疼痛评分为-0.34;95% CI: -0.65, -0.03; P = .03)。结论:与对照组相比,接受量身定制的渐进式步行加教育计划的参与者报告的背痛复发时间更短,程度更轻。然而,益处很小,临床相关性不确定。[J] .体育运动学报,2015;55(9):1-6。2025年8月6日。doi: 10.2519 / jospt.2025.13361。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy® (JOSPT®) publishes scientifically rigorous, clinically relevant content for physical therapists and others in the health care community to advance musculoskeletal and sports-related practice globally. To this end, JOSPT features the latest evidence-based research and clinical cases in musculoskeletal health, injury, and rehabilitation, including physical therapy, orthopaedics, sports medicine, and biomechanics. With an impact factor of 3.090, JOSPT is among the highest ranked physical therapy journals in Clarivate Analytics''s Journal Citation Reports, Science Edition (2017). JOSPT stands eighth of 65 journals in the category of rehabilitation, twelfth of 77 journals in orthopedics, and fourteenth of 81 journals in sport sciences. JOSPT''s 5-year impact factor is 4.061.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信