Effect of a Walking Plus Education Program on the Duration and Severity of Recurrences of Low Back Pain: A Secondary Exploratory Analysis of the WalkBack Trial.
Natasha C Pocovi, Petra L Graham, Ambrose Adelaide, Gokul Pisharody, Chung-Wei Christine Lin, Simon D French, Christopher G Maher, Johanna M van Dongen, Jane Latimer, Dafna Merom, Anne Tiedemann, Shuk Yin Kate Tong, Mark J Hancock
{"title":"Effect of a Walking Plus Education Program on the Duration and Severity of Recurrences of Low Back Pain: A Secondary Exploratory Analysis of the WalkBack Trial.","authors":"Natasha C Pocovi, Petra L Graham, Ambrose Adelaide, Gokul Pisharody, Chung-Wei Christine Lin, Simon D French, Christopher G Maher, Johanna M van Dongen, Jane Latimer, Dafna Merom, Anne Tiedemann, Shuk Yin Kate Tong, Mark J Hancock","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2025.13361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To explore the effect of the WalkBack intervention on the duration and severity of low back pain in participants who reported a recurrence. <b>DESIGN:</b> Secondary exploratory analysis of the WalkBack randomized controlled trial. <b>METHODS:</b> The WalkBack trial compared an individualized and progressive walking plus education program delivered by physiotherapists, to a no-treatment control group for preventing new recurrences of low back pain. In this study, we analyzed the first recurrence of low back pain (n = 596). The primary outcome for this analysis was the duration of the recurrence (time to recovery in days). The secondary outcomes were the level of interference with daily activity caused by the recurrence, and pain intensity (average and worst). Survival analysis, linear, and ordinal regression were used to compare outcomes between groups. <b>RESULTS:</b> Walking plus education was associated with a shorter duration of pain recurrence compared to control: median time to recovery 3 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3, 4) versus 4 days (95% CI: 4, 5); hazard ratio 1.30 (95% CI: 1.10, 1.53; <i>P</i> = .002). There was no between-group difference in interference with daily activity or average pain intensity. The intervention group reported lower worst pain intensity on average than the control group (-0.34 on a numerical pain-rating scale from 0 to 10; 95% CI: -0.65, -0.03; <i>P</i> = .03). <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Participants who received a tailored and progressive walking plus education program reported shorter and milder back pain recurrences than participants in the control group. However, the benefits were small and of uncertain clinical relevance. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(9):1-6. Epub 6 August 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13361</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 9","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2025.13361","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of the WalkBack intervention on the duration and severity of low back pain in participants who reported a recurrence. DESIGN: Secondary exploratory analysis of the WalkBack randomized controlled trial. METHODS: The WalkBack trial compared an individualized and progressive walking plus education program delivered by physiotherapists, to a no-treatment control group for preventing new recurrences of low back pain. In this study, we analyzed the first recurrence of low back pain (n = 596). The primary outcome for this analysis was the duration of the recurrence (time to recovery in days). The secondary outcomes were the level of interference with daily activity caused by the recurrence, and pain intensity (average and worst). Survival analysis, linear, and ordinal regression were used to compare outcomes between groups. RESULTS: Walking plus education was associated with a shorter duration of pain recurrence compared to control: median time to recovery 3 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3, 4) versus 4 days (95% CI: 4, 5); hazard ratio 1.30 (95% CI: 1.10, 1.53; P = .002). There was no between-group difference in interference with daily activity or average pain intensity. The intervention group reported lower worst pain intensity on average than the control group (-0.34 on a numerical pain-rating scale from 0 to 10; 95% CI: -0.65, -0.03; P = .03). CONCLUSION: Participants who received a tailored and progressive walking plus education program reported shorter and milder back pain recurrences than participants in the control group. However, the benefits were small and of uncertain clinical relevance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(9):1-6. Epub 6 August 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13361.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy® (JOSPT®) publishes scientifically rigorous, clinically relevant content for physical therapists and others in the health care community to advance musculoskeletal and sports-related practice globally. To this end, JOSPT features the latest evidence-based research and clinical cases in musculoskeletal health, injury, and rehabilitation, including physical therapy, orthopaedics, sports medicine, and biomechanics.
With an impact factor of 3.090, JOSPT is among the highest ranked physical therapy journals in Clarivate Analytics''s Journal Citation Reports, Science Edition (2017). JOSPT stands eighth of 65 journals in the category of rehabilitation, twelfth of 77 journals in orthopedics, and fourteenth of 81 journals in sport sciences. JOSPT''s 5-year impact factor is 4.061.