Evaluating the Impact of an eConsult Platform on Specialty Care Access for Medicaid Patients.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Birpartap S Thind, Moriah Maddalena, Waheed Baqai, Stanley K Frencher, William W Jih
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of an eConsult Platform on Specialty Care Access for Medicaid Patients.","authors":"Birpartap S Thind, Moriah Maddalena, Waheed Baqai, Stanley K Frencher, William W Jih","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2024.240322R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare access disparities persist, particularly among Medicaid patients in regions like the Inland Empire, California. These patients often face prolonged wait times for primary and specialty care, compounded by difficulties in scheduling with providers. Leveraging eConsult platforms offers a potential solution to improve specialist care accessibility. This study examines the impact of the Inland Empire Health Plan's (IEHP) eConsult services on enhancing interactions between primary care providers (PCPs) and specialists and improving patient care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 2,505 eConsults conducted between January and June 2022 within the IEHP, focusing on dermatology, pulmonology, and urology. Each eConsult was categorized based on closure outcomes, advice provided, and authorization status. We cross-referenced eConsult data with claims and authorization records to determine encounter completion, particularly whether a face-to-face specialist visit occurred.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only a fraction of eConsults (27% dermatology, 25% pulmonology, 37% urology) resulted in specialist advice. In cases where eConsults did not suffice, specialists recommended in-person follow-up; however, a significant portion of patients (57% dermatology, 71% pulmonology, 53% urology) did not receive in-person specialty care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the potential of eConsults in improving specialty care access for Medicaid patients in underserved regions. While eConsults show promise in expediting specialist access, challenges such as varying PCP utilization and the need for in-person visits persist. Addressing these issues with standardized protocols and better triaging can significantly reduce healthcare disparities and improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"592-598"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240322R1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Healthcare access disparities persist, particularly among Medicaid patients in regions like the Inland Empire, California. These patients often face prolonged wait times for primary and specialty care, compounded by difficulties in scheduling with providers. Leveraging eConsult platforms offers a potential solution to improve specialist care accessibility. This study examines the impact of the Inland Empire Health Plan's (IEHP) eConsult services on enhancing interactions between primary care providers (PCPs) and specialists and improving patient care.

Methods: We analyzed 2,505 eConsults conducted between January and June 2022 within the IEHP, focusing on dermatology, pulmonology, and urology. Each eConsult was categorized based on closure outcomes, advice provided, and authorization status. We cross-referenced eConsult data with claims and authorization records to determine encounter completion, particularly whether a face-to-face specialist visit occurred.

Results: Only a fraction of eConsults (27% dermatology, 25% pulmonology, 37% urology) resulted in specialist advice. In cases where eConsults did not suffice, specialists recommended in-person follow-up; however, a significant portion of patients (57% dermatology, 71% pulmonology, 53% urology) did not receive in-person specialty care.

Conclusion: This study highlights the potential of eConsults in improving specialty care access for Medicaid patients in underserved regions. While eConsults show promise in expediting specialist access, challenges such as varying PCP utilization and the need for in-person visits persist. Addressing these issues with standardized protocols and better triaging can significantly reduce healthcare disparities and improve patient outcomes.

评估咨询平台对医疗补助患者专科护理准入的影响。
背景:医疗保健获取差距持续存在,特别是在像加州内陆帝国地区的医疗补助患者中。这些患者往往面临着等待初级和专科护理的漫长时间,加上与提供者安排时间的困难。利用eConsult平台提供了改善专科护理可及性的潜在解决方案。本研究考察了内陆帝国健康计划(IEHP)的咨询服务对加强初级保健提供者(pcp)和专家之间的互动以及改善患者护理的影响。方法:我们分析了IEHP在2022年1月至6月期间进行的2505项econsult结果,重点是皮肤病学、肺病学和泌尿学。每个eConsult根据关闭结果、提供的建议和授权状态进行分类。我们将eConsult数据与索赔和授权记录进行交叉参考,以确定会诊完成情况,特别是是否进行了面对面的专家会诊。结果:只有一小部分的eConsults(27%皮肤科,25%肺科,37%泌尿科)得到了专家建议。如果eConsults结果不充分,专家建议进行面对面随访;然而,很大一部分患者(57%皮肤科,71%肺病科,53%泌尿科)没有接受面对面的专科护理。结论:本研究强调了eConsults在改善医疗服务不足地区医疗补助患者专科护理准入方面的潜力。虽然eConsults结果显示了加快专家访问的希望,但诸如不同PCP利用率和亲自访问需求等挑战仍然存在。通过标准化协议和更好的分诊来解决这些问题,可以显著减少医疗保健差异并改善患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信