Experimental Assessment of Conventional Features, CNN-Based Features and Ensemble Schemes for Discriminating Benign Versus Malignant Lesions on Breast Ultrasound Images.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 ACOUSTICS
Ultrasonic Imaging Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-28 DOI:10.1177/01617346251362168
Francesco Bianconi, Muhammad Usama Khan, Hongbo Du, Sabah Jassim
{"title":"Experimental Assessment of Conventional Features, CNN-Based Features and Ensemble Schemes for Discriminating Benign Versus Malignant Lesions on Breast Ultrasound Images.","authors":"Francesco Bianconi, Muhammad Usama Khan, Hongbo Du, Sabah Jassim","doi":"10.1177/01617346251362168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breast ultrasound images play a pivotal role in assessing the nature of suspicious breast lesions, particularly in patients with dense tissue. Computerized analysis of breast ultrasound images has the potential to assist the physician in the clinical decision-making and improve subjective interpretation. We assess the performance of conventional features, deep learning features and ensemble schemes for discriminating benign versus malignant breast lesions on ultrasound images. A total of 19 individual feature sets (1 morphological, 2 first-order, 10 texture-based, and 6 CNN-based) were included in the analysis. Furthermore, four combined feature sets (Best by class; Top 3, 5, and 7) and four fusion schemes (feature concatenation, majority voting, sum and product rule) were considered to generate ensemble models. The experiments were carried out on three independent open-access datasets respectively containing 252 (154 benign, 98 malignant), 232 (109 benign, 123 malignant), and 281 (187 benign, 94 malignant) lesions. CNN-based features outperformed the other individual descriptors achieving levels of accuracy between 77.4% and 83.6%, followed by morphological features (71.6%-80.8%) and histograms of oriented gradients (71.4%-77.6%). Ensemble models further improved the accuracy to 80.2% to 87.5%. Fusion schemes based on product and sum rule were generally superior to feature concatenation and majority voting. Combining individual feature sets by ensemble schemes demonstrates advantages for discriminating benign versus malignant breast lesions on ultrasound images.</p>","PeriodicalId":49401,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasonic Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"256-269"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasonic Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01617346251362168","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Breast ultrasound images play a pivotal role in assessing the nature of suspicious breast lesions, particularly in patients with dense tissue. Computerized analysis of breast ultrasound images has the potential to assist the physician in the clinical decision-making and improve subjective interpretation. We assess the performance of conventional features, deep learning features and ensemble schemes for discriminating benign versus malignant breast lesions on ultrasound images. A total of 19 individual feature sets (1 morphological, 2 first-order, 10 texture-based, and 6 CNN-based) were included in the analysis. Furthermore, four combined feature sets (Best by class; Top 3, 5, and 7) and four fusion schemes (feature concatenation, majority voting, sum and product rule) were considered to generate ensemble models. The experiments were carried out on three independent open-access datasets respectively containing 252 (154 benign, 98 malignant), 232 (109 benign, 123 malignant), and 281 (187 benign, 94 malignant) lesions. CNN-based features outperformed the other individual descriptors achieving levels of accuracy between 77.4% and 83.6%, followed by morphological features (71.6%-80.8%) and histograms of oriented gradients (71.4%-77.6%). Ensemble models further improved the accuracy to 80.2% to 87.5%. Fusion schemes based on product and sum rule were generally superior to feature concatenation and majority voting. Combining individual feature sets by ensemble schemes demonstrates advantages for discriminating benign versus malignant breast lesions on ultrasound images.

乳腺超声图像良恶性鉴别的常规特征、基于cnn的特征和集成方案的实验评估
乳腺超声图像在评估可疑乳腺病变的性质方面起着关键作用,特别是在致密组织患者中。乳房超声图像的计算机化分析有可能帮助医生在临床决策和提高主观解释。我们评估了常规特征、深度学习特征和集成方案在超声图像上区分乳腺良性与恶性病变的性能。共有19个单独的特征集(1个形态学特征集,2个一阶特征集,10个基于纹理的特征集,6个基于cnn的特征集)被纳入分析。此外,考虑了四种组合特征集(Best by class; Top 3、5和7)和四种融合方案(特征拼接、多数投票、和积规则)来生成集成模型。实验在三个独立的开放获取数据集上进行,分别包含252个(154个良性,98个恶性),232个(109个良性,123个恶性)和281个(187个良性,94个恶性)病变。基于cnn的特征优于其他单个描述符,准确率在77.4%到83.6%之间,其次是形态特征(71.6%到80.8%)和梯度方向直方图(71.4%到77.6%)。集成模型进一步提高了准确率,达到80.2% ~ 87.5%。基于乘积和规则的融合方案总体上优于特征拼接和多数投票。综合方案结合个体特征集证明了在超声图像上区分乳腺良恶性病变的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasonic Imaging
Ultrasonic Imaging 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ultrasonic Imaging provides rapid publication for original and exceptional papers concerned with the development and application of ultrasonic-imaging technology. Ultrasonic Imaging publishes articles in the following areas: theoretical and experimental aspects of advanced methods and instrumentation for imaging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信