Hui-Chen Wu, Yuyan Liao, Yunjia Lai, Po-Han Lin, Regina M Santella, Gary W Miller, Mary Beth Terry
{"title":"The plasma proteome and breast cancer risk.","authors":"Hui-Chen Wu, Yuyan Liao, Yunjia Lai, Po-Han Lin, Regina M Santella, Gary W Miller, Mary Beth Terry","doi":"10.1186/s13058-025-02110-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Plasma proteins may serve as biomarkers for breast cancer. This study aimed to characterize the blood proteomic signatures of women with a higher risk of breast cancer due to their family history.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a nested case-control study (median followup: 9.8 years) within the New York site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR) (n = 39 cases and 48 age-matched controls). We measured the expression levels as Normalized Protein Expression (NPX) of 92 proteins using the Olink Oncology panel. We then utilized an integrative network analysis of statistically significant protein markers and metabolomic profiles to better understand the potential molecular pathways involved in breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found four proteins were positively associated with breast cancer risk; the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence interval (CI) per 1-standard deviation (SD) increase in NPX were 1.87 (95% CI: 1.07, 3.28) for folate receptor (FR)-alpha, 2.72 (1.36, 5.44) for C-X-C motif chemokine 13 (CXCL13), 2.63 (1.32, 5.23) for amphiregulin (AREG), and 3.59 (95% CI: 1.58, 8.19) for mesothelin (MSLN). These results were no longer statistically significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons. Results from integrative network analysis using xMWAS suggested that the candidate protein markers were associated with distinct subsets of metabolites, forming single-protein-multiple metabolite clusters (|r|>0.3, p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While our results should be interpreted with caution, if replicated in larger prospective cohorts, these findings will have translational significance, attesting to the power of high-throughput profiling of circulating protein markers in identifying breast cancer biomarkers and important pathways involved in cancer development.</p>","PeriodicalId":49227,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research","volume":"27 1","pages":"157"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12400638/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-025-02110-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Plasma proteins may serve as biomarkers for breast cancer. This study aimed to characterize the blood proteomic signatures of women with a higher risk of breast cancer due to their family history.
Methods: We conducted a nested case-control study (median followup: 9.8 years) within the New York site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR) (n = 39 cases and 48 age-matched controls). We measured the expression levels as Normalized Protein Expression (NPX) of 92 proteins using the Olink Oncology panel. We then utilized an integrative network analysis of statistically significant protein markers and metabolomic profiles to better understand the potential molecular pathways involved in breast cancer.
Results: We found four proteins were positively associated with breast cancer risk; the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence interval (CI) per 1-standard deviation (SD) increase in NPX were 1.87 (95% CI: 1.07, 3.28) for folate receptor (FR)-alpha, 2.72 (1.36, 5.44) for C-X-C motif chemokine 13 (CXCL13), 2.63 (1.32, 5.23) for amphiregulin (AREG), and 3.59 (95% CI: 1.58, 8.19) for mesothelin (MSLN). These results were no longer statistically significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons. Results from integrative network analysis using xMWAS suggested that the candidate protein markers were associated with distinct subsets of metabolites, forming single-protein-multiple metabolite clusters (|r|>0.3, p < 0.05).
Conclusions: While our results should be interpreted with caution, if replicated in larger prospective cohorts, these findings will have translational significance, attesting to the power of high-throughput profiling of circulating protein markers in identifying breast cancer biomarkers and important pathways involved in cancer development.
期刊介绍:
Breast Cancer Research, an international, peer-reviewed online journal, publishes original research, reviews, editorials, and reports. It features open-access research articles of exceptional interest across all areas of biology and medicine relevant to breast cancer. This includes normal mammary gland biology, with a special emphasis on the genetic, biochemical, and cellular basis of breast cancer. In addition to basic research, the journal covers preclinical, translational, and clinical studies with a biological basis, including Phase I and Phase II trials.