External validation of precisebreast, a digital prognostic test for predicting breast cancer recurrence, in an early-stage cohort from the Netherlands.
Pieter J Westenend, Claudia Meurs, Gerardo Fernandez, Marcel Prastawa, Abishek Sainath Madduri, Aaron Feliz, Juan Carlos Mejias, Alexander Shtabsky, Xiaozhu Zhang, Brandon Veremis, Rebecca DeAngel, Michael J Donovan
{"title":"External validation of precisebreast, a digital prognostic test for predicting breast cancer recurrence, in an early-stage cohort from the Netherlands.","authors":"Pieter J Westenend, Claudia Meurs, Gerardo Fernandez, Marcel Prastawa, Abishek Sainath Madduri, Aaron Feliz, Juan Carlos Mejias, Alexander Shtabsky, Xiaozhu Zhang, Brandon Veremis, Rebecca DeAngel, Michael J Donovan","doi":"10.1186/s13058-025-02104-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current clinical guidelines recommend gene expression profiling to guide treatment in early-stage breast cancer. PreciseBreast (PDxBR) is a digital prognostic tool that integrates artificial intelligence (AI)-derived features from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides with clinicopathologic data to predict recurrence risk. This study externally validated PDxBR in an independent cohort and compared its performance to other risk models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed PDxBR in a cohort of 739 patients with early-stage hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (median follow-up of 8.8 years). For each case, one H&E-stained slide was digitized and analyzed to generate recurrence risk scores using the full PDxBR model, as well as image-only and clinical-only variants. A subset of patients who underwent MammaPrint testing was also evaluated. Model performance was assessed by AUC/C-index, hazard ratios, sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values (NPV and PPV, respectively).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PDxBR showed prognostic accuracy in this external cohort (AUC/C-index 0.71, 95% CI: 0.66-0.75). Applying the PDxBR threshold (≥ 58 versus < 58) yielded a hazard ratio of 3.05 (95% CI: 2.1-4.4, p < 0.001), sensitivity 0.70, specificity 0.59, NPV 0.90, and PPV 0.27. PDxBR outperformed the modified Adjuvant! Online clinical model (MINDACT model, p < 0.00001) and effectively reclassified grade 2 tumors into distinct risk groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PDxBR demonstrated robust prognostic performance in an independent cohort, supporting its potential as a scalable, reproducible alternative to genomic assays for individualized risk stratification in early-stage breast cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":49227,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research","volume":"27 1","pages":"152"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369158/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-025-02104-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Current clinical guidelines recommend gene expression profiling to guide treatment in early-stage breast cancer. PreciseBreast (PDxBR) is a digital prognostic tool that integrates artificial intelligence (AI)-derived features from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides with clinicopathologic data to predict recurrence risk. This study externally validated PDxBR in an independent cohort and compared its performance to other risk models.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed PDxBR in a cohort of 739 patients with early-stage hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (median follow-up of 8.8 years). For each case, one H&E-stained slide was digitized and analyzed to generate recurrence risk scores using the full PDxBR model, as well as image-only and clinical-only variants. A subset of patients who underwent MammaPrint testing was also evaluated. Model performance was assessed by AUC/C-index, hazard ratios, sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values (NPV and PPV, respectively).
Results: PDxBR showed prognostic accuracy in this external cohort (AUC/C-index 0.71, 95% CI: 0.66-0.75). Applying the PDxBR threshold (≥ 58 versus < 58) yielded a hazard ratio of 3.05 (95% CI: 2.1-4.4, p < 0.001), sensitivity 0.70, specificity 0.59, NPV 0.90, and PPV 0.27. PDxBR outperformed the modified Adjuvant! Online clinical model (MINDACT model, p < 0.00001) and effectively reclassified grade 2 tumors into distinct risk groups.
Conclusions: PDxBR demonstrated robust prognostic performance in an independent cohort, supporting its potential as a scalable, reproducible alternative to genomic assays for individualized risk stratification in early-stage breast cancer.
期刊介绍:
Breast Cancer Research, an international, peer-reviewed online journal, publishes original research, reviews, editorials, and reports. It features open-access research articles of exceptional interest across all areas of biology and medicine relevant to breast cancer. This includes normal mammary gland biology, with a special emphasis on the genetic, biochemical, and cellular basis of breast cancer. In addition to basic research, the journal covers preclinical, translational, and clinical studies with a biological basis, including Phase I and Phase II trials.