Envisioning the future of primary care: intervention strategies to support patient-centered communication feedback technology.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Raina Langevin, Deepthi Mohanraj, Libby Shah, Janice Sabin, Brian R Wood, Wanda Pratt, Nadir Weibel, Andrea L Hartzler
{"title":"Envisioning the future of primary care: intervention strategies to support patient-centered communication feedback technology.","authors":"Raina Langevin, Deepthi Mohanraj, Libby Shah, Janice Sabin, Brian R Wood, Wanda Pratt, Nadir Weibel, Andrea L Hartzler","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocaf143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Clinician implicit bias can impede patient-centered communication, leading to health care inequities. While the field of implicit bias education is evolving with advances in technology, clinicians' perspectives remain underexplored. This study investigated clinicians' perceptions of educational strategies to complement communication feedback technology in the implementation of an implicit bias education intervention.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We recruited primary care practitioners in remote interviews to brainstorm future technologies for improving clinician awareness of implicit bias in patient-provider communication. Participants completed an online survey in which they rated the priority of educational strategies that could complement the technology. We performed inductive-deductive thematic analysis of the interview data with Implicit Bias Recognition and Management (IBRM) domains as a priori codes and used descriptive statistics to summarize the survey data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (n = 16) proposed how future technology could improve clinician awareness, such as recording visits to help clinicians be more self-aware of their communication; however, some providers expressed concerns regarding feedback fatigue and the potential impact of technology on reducing time spent with patients. Participants recommended incorporating feedback regularly into training, identifying organizational incentives, and debriefing with trusted colleagues and communication experts.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Participants brainstormed technologies and identified educational strategies, such as discussion with a facilitator, that could promote clinician receptivity to feedback and inform IBRM approaches for clinical ambient intelligence. Yet, challenges remain to incentivizing participation for practicing clinicians, and Continuing Medical Education may be one effective approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed technologies and prioritized educational strategies have the potential to promote health equity by helping clinicians develop skills to manage implicit bias. In the future, these findings could inform IBRM interventions that leverage clinical ambient intelligence.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf143","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Clinician implicit bias can impede patient-centered communication, leading to health care inequities. While the field of implicit bias education is evolving with advances in technology, clinicians' perspectives remain underexplored. This study investigated clinicians' perceptions of educational strategies to complement communication feedback technology in the implementation of an implicit bias education intervention.

Materials and methods: We recruited primary care practitioners in remote interviews to brainstorm future technologies for improving clinician awareness of implicit bias in patient-provider communication. Participants completed an online survey in which they rated the priority of educational strategies that could complement the technology. We performed inductive-deductive thematic analysis of the interview data with Implicit Bias Recognition and Management (IBRM) domains as a priori codes and used descriptive statistics to summarize the survey data.

Results: Participants (n = 16) proposed how future technology could improve clinician awareness, such as recording visits to help clinicians be more self-aware of their communication; however, some providers expressed concerns regarding feedback fatigue and the potential impact of technology on reducing time spent with patients. Participants recommended incorporating feedback regularly into training, identifying organizational incentives, and debriefing with trusted colleagues and communication experts.

Discussion: Participants brainstormed technologies and identified educational strategies, such as discussion with a facilitator, that could promote clinician receptivity to feedback and inform IBRM approaches for clinical ambient intelligence. Yet, challenges remain to incentivizing participation for practicing clinicians, and Continuing Medical Education may be one effective approach.

Conclusion: The proposed technologies and prioritized educational strategies have the potential to promote health equity by helping clinicians develop skills to manage implicit bias. In the future, these findings could inform IBRM interventions that leverage clinical ambient intelligence.

展望初级保健的未来:支持以患者为中心的沟通反馈技术的干预策略。
目的:临床医生内隐偏见会阻碍以患者为中心的沟通,导致医疗保健不公平。虽然内隐偏见教育领域随着技术的进步而不断发展,但临床医生的观点仍未得到充分探索。本研究调查了临床医生在实施内隐偏见教育干预时对教育策略的看法,以补充沟通反馈技术。材料和方法:我们在远程访谈中招募了初级保健从业人员,以集思广益未来的技术,以提高临床医生对医患沟通中隐性偏见的认识。参与者完成了一份在线调查,在这份调查中,他们对可以补充这项技术的教育策略的优先级进行了评级。以隐性偏见识别与管理(IBRM)域为先验编码,对访谈数据进行归纳演绎专题分析,并采用描述性统计方法对调查数据进行汇总。结果:参与者(n = 16)提出了未来技术如何提高临床医生的意识,如记录就诊情况,以帮助临床医生对自己的沟通有更多的自我意识;然而,一些医疗服务提供者对反馈疲劳和技术对减少与患者相处时间的潜在影响表示担忧。与会者建议将反馈定期纳入培训,确定组织激励措施,并与值得信赖的同事和沟通专家进行汇报。讨论:参与者对技术进行头脑风暴,并确定教育策略,例如与主持人进行讨论,这可以提高临床医生对反馈的接受度,并为临床环境智能提供IBRM方法。然而,挑战仍然存在,以激励参与执业临床医生,继续医学教育可能是一个有效的方法。结论:提出的技术和优先的教育策略有可能通过帮助临床医生培养管理内隐偏见的技能来促进卫生公平。在未来,这些发现可以为IBRM干预提供信息,以利用临床环境智能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
7.80%
发文量
230
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信