[Palliative care and dying in emergency medical services-Attitudes, perspectives and knowledge of emergency physicians].

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Susanne Glass, Magdalena Bier, Celina Pötz, Lukas Jäger, Tobias Grübl, Pia von Blanckenburg, Christian Volberg
{"title":"[Palliative care and dying in emergency medical services-Attitudes, perspectives and knowledge of emergency physicians].","authors":"Susanne Glass, Magdalena Bier, Celina Pötz, Lukas Jäger, Tobias Grübl, Pia von Blanckenburg, Christian Volberg","doi":"10.1007/s00063-025-01313-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency physicians are confronted with the topic of death and dying almost daily in their work. Demographic changes and the accompanying increase in chronic and incurable diseases at the end of life as well as the frequently expressed wish to die at home, are leading to an increase in emergency situations with palliative patients. To date, there is insufficient data available on how emergency physicians deal with palliative patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Emergency physicians from two service providers participated in the survey 'Palliative Care and Dying in Emergency Medical Service'. The emergency physicians were asked to complete a paper-and-pencil survey covering several topics in the areas of palliative medicine and descriptions of conflicts in non-emergency medical situations. They were also asked about their personal attitudes towards dying and death, based on established psychometric standards. The survey was conducted anonymously.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 40% (n = 67). Participants had an average age of 41 years, and 66% (n = 44) were male. The majority of emergency physicians surveyed were anaesthetists and had worked as emergency physicians for more than five years. Only six respondents (9%) had an additional training in palliative medicine. On average, more experienced doctors felt better prepared to deal with dying patients than those with less than five years' professional experience as emergency physicians. The survey showed that many emergency physicians experience a conflict between end-of-life care and saving lives when treating palliative patients. None of the respondents stated that palliative medicine had nothing to do with emergency medicine. The emergency physicians surveyed expressed uncertainty regarding the acute preclinical care of palliative patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The expertise of emergency physicians in palliative medicine increases with the level of operational experience. Almost all respondents consider this topic to be very important and would like to see it integrated more strongly into training and continuing professional education. A lack of knowledge may result in palliative patients being offered less meaningful therapies, which could lead to hospitalisation. Demographic changes will increase the need for emergency physicians with expertise in palliative medicine. The discrepancy identified must be addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49019,"journal":{"name":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-025-01313-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emergency physicians are confronted with the topic of death and dying almost daily in their work. Demographic changes and the accompanying increase in chronic and incurable diseases at the end of life as well as the frequently expressed wish to die at home, are leading to an increase in emergency situations with palliative patients. To date, there is insufficient data available on how emergency physicians deal with palliative patients.

Method: Emergency physicians from two service providers participated in the survey 'Palliative Care and Dying in Emergency Medical Service'. The emergency physicians were asked to complete a paper-and-pencil survey covering several topics in the areas of palliative medicine and descriptions of conflicts in non-emergency medical situations. They were also asked about their personal attitudes towards dying and death, based on established psychometric standards. The survey was conducted anonymously.

Results: The response rate was 40% (n = 67). Participants had an average age of 41 years, and 66% (n = 44) were male. The majority of emergency physicians surveyed were anaesthetists and had worked as emergency physicians for more than five years. Only six respondents (9%) had an additional training in palliative medicine. On average, more experienced doctors felt better prepared to deal with dying patients than those with less than five years' professional experience as emergency physicians. The survey showed that many emergency physicians experience a conflict between end-of-life care and saving lives when treating palliative patients. None of the respondents stated that palliative medicine had nothing to do with emergency medicine. The emergency physicians surveyed expressed uncertainty regarding the acute preclinical care of palliative patients.

Conclusion: The expertise of emergency physicians in palliative medicine increases with the level of operational experience. Almost all respondents consider this topic to be very important and would like to see it integrated more strongly into training and continuing professional education. A lack of knowledge may result in palliative patients being offered less meaningful therapies, which could lead to hospitalisation. Demographic changes will increase the need for emergency physicians with expertise in palliative medicine. The discrepancy identified must be addressed.

[缓和治疗和急救医疗服务中的死亡——急救医生的态度、观点和知识]。
背景:急诊医生在工作中几乎每天都面临着死亡和濒死的话题。人口结构的变化以及随之而来的临终慢性病和不治之症的增加,以及人们经常表示希望在家中死亡,导致姑息疗法患者的紧急情况增加。迄今为止,关于急诊医生如何处理姑息治疗患者的数据不足。方法:来自两家医疗服务机构的急诊医师参与“急诊医疗服务中的临终关怀与临终”调查。要求急诊医生完成一项纸笔调查,内容涉及缓和医学领域的若干主题,并描述非紧急医疗情况下的冲突。根据既定的心理测量标准,他们还被问及对死亡和死亡的个人态度。这项调查是匿名进行的。结果:有效率为40% (n = 67)。参与者的平均年龄为41岁,66% (n = 44)为男性。大多数接受调查的急诊医生是麻醉师,从事急诊医生工作超过5年。只有6个答复者(9%)接受过缓和医学方面的额外培训。平均而言,经验丰富的医生比那些专业经验不足五年的急诊医生更能应对垂死病人。调查显示,许多急诊医生在治疗姑息治疗患者时,经历了临终关怀和拯救生命之间的冲突。没有一个答复者说缓和医学与急诊医学无关。接受调查的急诊医生对姑息治疗患者的急性临床前护理表示不确定。结论:急诊医师在姑息医学方面的专业知识随着手术经验水平的提高而提高。几乎所有的受访者都认为这一主题非常重要,并希望看到它更有力地融入培训和继续专业教育。缺乏知识可能会导致姑息治疗患者得到的治疗意义不大,从而可能导致住院治疗。人口变化将增加对具有缓和医学专业知识的急诊医生的需求。必须解决所发现的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medizinische Klinik – Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin is an internationally respected interdisciplinary journal. It is intended for physicians, nurses, respiratory and physical therapists active in intensive care and accident/emergency units, but also for internists, anesthesiologists, surgeons, neurologists, and pediatricians with special interest in intensive care medicine. Comprehensive reviews describe the most recent advances in the field of internal medicine with special focus on intensive care problems. Freely submitted original articles present important studies in this discipline and promote scientific exchange, while articles in the category Photo essay feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. In the rubric journal club well-respected experts comment on outstanding international publications. Review articles under the rubric "Continuing Medical Education" present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice. The rubrics "Nursing practice" and "Physical therapy" round out the information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信