Katrina Ann-Marie Lee, Christopher S Evans, Misty Skinner
{"title":"Special Issue on CDS Failures: Finding the Right Level of Interruption to Improve Suicide Screening Compliance in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Katrina Ann-Marie Lee, Christopher S Evans, Misty Skinner","doi":"10.1055/a-2627-2493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of real-time Clinical Decision Support (CDS), such as Our Practice Advisory (OPAs), augments clinical decisions while helping to reduce errors and ensuring compliance with organizational best practices1. In complex large health systems, processes for standardization and adherence to emergency department (ED) based suicide screening practices are challenging and may benefit from the use of CDS-based tools adhering to the five rights of CDS2.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To improve suicide screening compliance for the ED to 95% by implementing a contextually appropriate CDS-based tool within the electronic health record (EHR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary group of Quality and ED nursing leadership aimed to develop a chief complaint driven OPA that improved adherence to and completion of suicide screening in the ED. Using an iterative design process over 3 months, a series of two distinct suicide screening OPAs were developed with varying levels of interruption, but both relied on rule-based logic to identify if an ED patient met one of the 57 pre-defined \"Reasons for Visit\" or chief complaints requiring suicide screening. Use of chief complaint driving CDS removed the need for manually remembering complex criteria while contributing to meeting regulatory and organizational standards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ED suicide screening compliance improved from 64.96% to 77.66% with the initial implementation of the non-interruptive OPA. Subsequently, an interruptive OPA (pop-up window based on a defined trigger that stops the clinician and requires a response), was introduced which further increased screenings being completed to 91.69%. The use of CDS interruptive OPAs significantly improved compliance with suicide screening by including the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) tool directly in the OPA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of contextually relevant information, such as reason for visit or chief complaint, and interruptive CDS tools embedded into EHR workflows may improve ED based suicide screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2627-2493","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The use of real-time Clinical Decision Support (CDS), such as Our Practice Advisory (OPAs), augments clinical decisions while helping to reduce errors and ensuring compliance with organizational best practices1. In complex large health systems, processes for standardization and adherence to emergency department (ED) based suicide screening practices are challenging and may benefit from the use of CDS-based tools adhering to the five rights of CDS2.
Objectives: To improve suicide screening compliance for the ED to 95% by implementing a contextually appropriate CDS-based tool within the electronic health record (EHR).
Methods: A multidisciplinary group of Quality and ED nursing leadership aimed to develop a chief complaint driven OPA that improved adherence to and completion of suicide screening in the ED. Using an iterative design process over 3 months, a series of two distinct suicide screening OPAs were developed with varying levels of interruption, but both relied on rule-based logic to identify if an ED patient met one of the 57 pre-defined "Reasons for Visit" or chief complaints requiring suicide screening. Use of chief complaint driving CDS removed the need for manually remembering complex criteria while contributing to meeting regulatory and organizational standards.
Results: The ED suicide screening compliance improved from 64.96% to 77.66% with the initial implementation of the non-interruptive OPA. Subsequently, an interruptive OPA (pop-up window based on a defined trigger that stops the clinician and requires a response), was introduced which further increased screenings being completed to 91.69%. The use of CDS interruptive OPAs significantly improved compliance with suicide screening by including the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) tool directly in the OPA.
Conclusion: Use of contextually relevant information, such as reason for visit or chief complaint, and interruptive CDS tools embedded into EHR workflows may improve ED based suicide screening.
背景:实时临床决策支持(CDS)的使用,如Our Practice Advisory (OPAs),增加了临床决策,同时有助于减少错误并确保符合组织最佳实践1。在复杂的大型卫生系统中,标准化和遵守基于急诊科(ED)的自杀筛查做法的过程具有挑战性,并且可能受益于使用符合CDS2五项权利的基于cds的工具。目的:通过在电子健康记录(EHR)中实施上下文适当的基于cd的工具,将ED的自杀筛查依从性提高到95%。方法:护理领导一个多学科小组的质量和ED旨在开发一个主诉OPA驱动,提高遵守并完成自杀。使用一个迭代设计过程中筛选超过3个月,一系列的两种截然不同的自杀式筛选赞助方是发达与不同级别的中断,但都依赖于基于规则的逻辑来确定如果一个ED患者遇到的57个预定义的“访问”的理由或首席投诉要求自杀筛查。使用主诉驱动CDS消除了手动记忆复杂标准的需要,同时有助于满足法规和组织标准。结果:初步实施不间断OPA后,ED自杀筛查依从性由64.96%提高到77.66%。随后,引入了中断OPA(基于定义的触发因素的弹出窗口,可以阻止临床医生并要求做出反应),进一步将筛查完成率提高到91.69%。通过将哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表(C-SSRS)直接纳入OPA, CDS中断性OPA的使用显著提高了自杀筛查的依从性。结论:使用情境相关信息,如就诊原因或主诉,以及嵌入EHR工作流程的中断性CDS工具可以改善基于ED的自杀筛查。
期刊介绍:
ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.