Purchase of both proximal and distal fragments by the calcar screw is critical when using a locking plate in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures : the role of the calcar screw as a medial bridging screw.
Kyosun Hwang, Kanghun Yu, Jin Hyeok Lee, Jun-Gyu Moon, An Seong Chang, Jung Ho Park, Hyun Gon Kim, Woong Kyo Jeong
{"title":"Purchase of both proximal and distal fragments by the calcar screw is critical when using a locking plate in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures : the role of the calcar screw as a medial bridging screw.","authors":"Kyosun Hwang, Kanghun Yu, Jin Hyeok Lee, Jun-Gyu Moon, An Seong Chang, Jung Ho Park, Hyun Gon Kim, Woong Kyo Jeong","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B9.BJJ-2024-1649.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Inferior positioning of the calcar screw is important in the purchase of medial screws when treating proximal humeral fractures with a locking plate. However, the impact of the overall trajectory of the calcar screw has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the failure of a calcar screw to purchase both proximal and distal fragments would contribute to an increased risk of failure of fixation in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent locking plate fixation for a proximal humeral fracture between January 2012 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. They were divided into two groups: a purchase group (P) in whom the calcar screw intersected the fracture line on postoperative anteroposterior radiographs, indicating purchase of both proximal and distal fragments; and a non-purchase group (NP) in whom the screw did not have purchase in both fragments. A total of 163 patients were included; 102 and 61 in the P and NP groups, respectively. We compared the rates of failure of fixation between these groups and performed a multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify the risk factors for failure of fixation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of failure of fixation was significantly higher in the NP group (31.2%; 19 of 61) compared with the P group (3.9%; 4 of 102) (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of medical comorbidities, reduction of the fracture, or fixation status. Stepwise multivariable regression identified diabetes (odds ratio (OR) 4.36 (95% CI 1.23 to 16.78); p = 0.025), medial cortical translation of > 5 mm (OR 4.70 (95% CI 1.07 to 21.29); p = 0.039), and NP (OR 16.10 (95% CI 4.72 to 71.62); p < 0.001) as significant risk factors for failure of fixation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Failure of the calcar screw to purchase both the proximal and distal fragments was associated with a significantly higher rate of failure of fixation in the surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures using a locking plate.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 9","pages":"942-949"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B9.BJJ-2024-1649.R1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: Inferior positioning of the calcar screw is important in the purchase of medial screws when treating proximal humeral fractures with a locking plate. However, the impact of the overall trajectory of the calcar screw has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the failure of a calcar screw to purchase both proximal and distal fragments would contribute to an increased risk of failure of fixation in these patients.
Methods: Patients who underwent locking plate fixation for a proximal humeral fracture between January 2012 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. They were divided into two groups: a purchase group (P) in whom the calcar screw intersected the fracture line on postoperative anteroposterior radiographs, indicating purchase of both proximal and distal fragments; and a non-purchase group (NP) in whom the screw did not have purchase in both fragments. A total of 163 patients were included; 102 and 61 in the P and NP groups, respectively. We compared the rates of failure of fixation between these groups and performed a multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify the risk factors for failure of fixation.
Results: The rate of failure of fixation was significantly higher in the NP group (31.2%; 19 of 61) compared with the P group (3.9%; 4 of 102) (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of medical comorbidities, reduction of the fracture, or fixation status. Stepwise multivariable regression identified diabetes (odds ratio (OR) 4.36 (95% CI 1.23 to 16.78); p = 0.025), medial cortical translation of > 5 mm (OR 4.70 (95% CI 1.07 to 21.29); p = 0.039), and NP (OR 16.10 (95% CI 4.72 to 71.62); p < 0.001) as significant risk factors for failure of fixation.
Conclusion: Failure of the calcar screw to purchase both the proximal and distal fragments was associated with a significantly higher rate of failure of fixation in the surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures using a locking plate.
期刊介绍:
We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.