A gene-based model of fitness and its implications for genetic variation: Linkage disequilibrium.

IF 5.1 3区 生物学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Genetics Pub Date : 2025-08-22 DOI:10.1093/genetics/iyaf168
Parul Johri, Brian Charlesworth
{"title":"A gene-based model of fitness and its implications for genetic variation: Linkage disequilibrium.","authors":"Parul Johri, Brian Charlesworth","doi":"10.1093/genetics/iyaf168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A widely used model of the effects of mutations on fitness (the \"sites\" model) assumes that heterozygous recessive or partially recessive deleterious mutations at different sites in a gene complement each other, similarly to mutations in different genes. However, the general lack of complementation between major effect allelic mutations suggests an alternative possibility, which we term the \"gene\" model. This model assumes that a pair of heterozygous deleterious mutations in trans behave effectively as homozygotes, so that the fitnesses of trans heterozygotes are lower than those of cis heterozygotes. We examine the properties of the two different models, using both analytical and simulation methods. We show that the gene model predicts positive linkage disequilibrium (LD) between deleterious variants within the coding sequence under conditions when the sites model predicts zero or slightly negative LD. We also show that focussing on rare variants when examining patterns of LD, especially with Lewontin's D´ measure, is likely to produce misleading results with respect to inferences concerning the causes of the sign of LD. Synergistic epistasis between pairs of mutations was also modeled; it is less likely to produce negative LD under the gene model than the sites model. The theoretical results are discussed in relation to patterns of LD in natural populations of several species.</p>","PeriodicalId":48925,"journal":{"name":"Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyaf168","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A widely used model of the effects of mutations on fitness (the "sites" model) assumes that heterozygous recessive or partially recessive deleterious mutations at different sites in a gene complement each other, similarly to mutations in different genes. However, the general lack of complementation between major effect allelic mutations suggests an alternative possibility, which we term the "gene" model. This model assumes that a pair of heterozygous deleterious mutations in trans behave effectively as homozygotes, so that the fitnesses of trans heterozygotes are lower than those of cis heterozygotes. We examine the properties of the two different models, using both analytical and simulation methods. We show that the gene model predicts positive linkage disequilibrium (LD) between deleterious variants within the coding sequence under conditions when the sites model predicts zero or slightly negative LD. We also show that focussing on rare variants when examining patterns of LD, especially with Lewontin's D´ measure, is likely to produce misleading results with respect to inferences concerning the causes of the sign of LD. Synergistic epistasis between pairs of mutations was also modeled; it is less likely to produce negative LD under the gene model than the sites model. The theoretical results are discussed in relation to patterns of LD in natural populations of several species.

基于基因的适合度模型及其对遗传变异的影响:连锁不平衡。
一种广泛使用的突变对适应度影响的模型(“位点”模型)假设,基因不同位点上的杂合隐性或部分隐性有害突变相互补充,类似于不同基因中的突变。然而,主要效应等位基因突变之间普遍缺乏互补,提出了另一种可能性,我们称之为“基因”模型。该模型假设一对反式杂合有害突变有效地表现为纯合子,因此反式杂合子的适应度低于顺式杂合子。我们用分析和模拟两种方法来检验这两种不同模型的性质。研究表明,基因模型预测编码序列中有害变异之间的正连锁不平衡(LD),而位点模型预测的LD为零或略负。研究还表明,在检查LD模式时,特别是使用Lewontin‘s D ’测量,关注罕见变异,可能会在推断LD标志的原因方面产生误导性的结果。与位点模型相比,基因模型下产生负LD的可能性更小。讨论了理论结果与若干种自然居群的LD模式的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genetics
Genetics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
177
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GENETICS is published by the Genetics Society of America, a scholarly society that seeks to deepen our understanding of the living world by advancing our understanding of genetics. Since 1916, GENETICS has published high-quality, original research presenting novel findings bearing on genetics and genomics. The journal publishes empirical studies of organisms ranging from microbes to humans, as well as theoretical work. While it has an illustrious history, GENETICS has changed along with the communities it serves: it is not your mentor''s journal. The editors make decisions quickly – in around 30 days – without sacrificing the excellence and scholarship for which the journal has long been known. GENETICS is a peer reviewed, peer-edited journal, with an international reach and increasing visibility and impact. All editorial decisions are made through collaboration of at least two editors who are practicing scientists. GENETICS is constantly innovating: expanded types of content include Reviews, Commentary (current issues of interest to geneticists), Perspectives (historical), Primers (to introduce primary literature into the classroom), Toolbox Reviews, plus YeastBook, FlyBook, and WormBook (coming spring 2016). For particularly time-sensitive results, we publish Communications. As part of our mission to serve our communities, we''ve published thematic collections, including Genomic Selection, Multiparental Populations, Mouse Collaborative Cross, and the Genetics of Sex.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信