A family-centred core outcome set for infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip undergoing brace treatment.

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Joanna Craven, Wesley W E S Theunissen, Olivia O'Malley, Daniel M G Winson, Emma Morley, Miranda Asher, Clare Carpenter, Daniel C Perry
{"title":"A family-centred core outcome set for infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip undergoing brace treatment.","authors":"Joanna Craven, Wesley W E S Theunissen, Olivia O'Malley, Daniel M G Winson, Emma Morley, Miranda Asher, Clare Carpenter, Daniel C Perry","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B9.BJJ-2025-0059.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to identify a minimum set of family-centred outcomes that should be collected in research involving infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) undergoing brace treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive list of potential outcomes was developed through a literature review and survey of key stakeholders including caregivers, clinicians, and researchers. Potential outcomes were evaluated in a two-round Delphi consensus process, which included a UK-led group with international involvement comprising orthopaedic surgeons, physiotherapists, nurse practitioners, researchers, parents, and charity representatives. Outcomes that did not reach consensus were discussed during a final consensus meeting, where a broad group of stakeholders voted on the inclusion or exclusion of these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 family-centred outcomes were identified for inclusion in the Delphi process. Of these, 12 were derived from the comprehensive literature review and two additional outcomes were added following the initial stakeholder survey. No additional outcomes were identified during the Delphi process. Of the 14 outcomes, eight achieved 'consensus in' during the Delphi rounds and none were excluded. Six outcomes were further discussed at the final consensus meeting, resulting in one being added to the final core outcome set (COS). The final COS includes nine outcomes: infant cleanliness, sleep, comfort, development, skin irritation, and feeding; along with parental wellbeing, bonding, and the availability of information and resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This family-centred COS is recommended as the minimum set of outcomes that should be collected in trials involving infants undergoing brace treatment for DDH. Further work is required to identify or develop an appropriate tool for collecting data on these outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 9","pages":"973-978"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B9.BJJ-2025-0059.R1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to identify a minimum set of family-centred outcomes that should be collected in research involving infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) undergoing brace treatment.

Methods: A comprehensive list of potential outcomes was developed through a literature review and survey of key stakeholders including caregivers, clinicians, and researchers. Potential outcomes were evaluated in a two-round Delphi consensus process, which included a UK-led group with international involvement comprising orthopaedic surgeons, physiotherapists, nurse practitioners, researchers, parents, and charity representatives. Outcomes that did not reach consensus were discussed during a final consensus meeting, where a broad group of stakeholders voted on the inclusion or exclusion of these outcomes.

Results: A total of 14 family-centred outcomes were identified for inclusion in the Delphi process. Of these, 12 were derived from the comprehensive literature review and two additional outcomes were added following the initial stakeholder survey. No additional outcomes were identified during the Delphi process. Of the 14 outcomes, eight achieved 'consensus in' during the Delphi rounds and none were excluded. Six outcomes were further discussed at the final consensus meeting, resulting in one being added to the final core outcome set (COS). The final COS includes nine outcomes: infant cleanliness, sleep, comfort, development, skin irritation, and feeding; along with parental wellbeing, bonding, and the availability of information and resources.

Conclusion: This family-centred COS is recommended as the minimum set of outcomes that should be collected in trials involving infants undergoing brace treatment for DDH. Further work is required to identify or develop an appropriate tool for collecting data on these outcomes.

一个以家庭为中心的核心结果集的婴儿发育不良的髋关节接受支架治疗。
目的:本研究的目的是确定一组最小的以家庭为中心的结果,这些结果应该收集在接受支架治疗的患有髋关节发育不良(DDH)的婴儿的研究中。方法:通过文献综述和对关键利益相关者(包括护理人员、临床医生和研究人员)的调查,制定了一份全面的潜在结果清单。在两轮德尔菲共识过程中评估了潜在的结果,其中包括一个由英国领导的国际参与小组,包括骨科医生、物理治疗师、执业护士、研究人员、家长和慈善机构代表。未达成共识的成果在最终共识会议上进行了讨论,在会议上,广泛的利益攸关方对这些成果的纳入或排除进行了投票。结果:共有14个以家庭为中心的结果被确定纳入德尔菲过程。其中,12个来自综合文献综述,两个额外的结果是在最初的利益相关者调查之后添加的。在德尔菲过程中没有发现其他结果。在14个结果中,有8个在德尔菲回合中达成了“共识”,没有一个被排除在外。在最后的协商一致会议上进一步讨论了六项成果,其中一项成果被列入最终的核心成果集。最终COS包括9个指标:婴儿清洁度、睡眠、舒适度、发育、皮肤刺激和喂养;还有父母的幸福,亲密关系,以及信息和资源的可用性。结论:这种以家庭为中心的COS被推荐为在婴儿接受支具治疗DDH的试验中应该收集的最低结果集。需要进一步开展工作,确定或开发收集这些结果数据的适当工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Journal
Bone & Joint Journal ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
318
期刊介绍: We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信