What Matters to You, Matters to Us: A Case Study on Leveraging the Electronic Health Record for Patient-Centered Care.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Carly Critchfield, Vignesh Prasad, Maulik Joshi
{"title":"What Matters to You, Matters to Us: A Case Study on Leveraging the Electronic Health Record for Patient-Centered Care.","authors":"Carly Critchfield, Vignesh Prasad, Maulik Joshi","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient-centered care is paramount for optimal outcomes. To address this, at Meritus Health, we asked a simple, yet profound question: \"What matters most to you? (WMM)\" This question, integrated into the patients' electronic health records (EHRs), facilitates meaningful conversations and helps tailor care to align with patient goals. This initiative, grounded in the principles of Age-Friendly Healthcare from the John A. Hartford Foundation, underscores the power of information by enabling clinicians to gain a comprehensive understanding of their patients. Our implementation required significant teamwork and provider engagement. Over 3 years, we have recorded more than 65,000 responses, creating a strategic priority for the health system to personalize care, guide clinical decision making, and drive continuous improvement. This strategic priority is health system wide. Patient-facing units and departments all across the health system track and report monthly metrics on the number of WMM responses captured. In addition, many departments across the system lead quality-improvement projects to improve and refine the process of asking this question.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed the patient responses to the WMM question to identify the frequency of common answers and also sought to review the implementation of the question process for learning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our analysis of more than 65,000 patient responses, we categorized the answers into the top distinct groups with the top five categories identified being family and relationships (noted 38% of the time), well-being (22%), health concerns (15%), lifestyle (6%), and religion and faith (3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Asking and knowing WMM to patients offers more than just insight; it builds a meaningful conversation and relationship between the provider and patient in knowing the whole person. The top responses from patients are intuitively not surprising. The key to our questioning of the patients and the integration in the EHR are not the responses themselves, but the process of asking, knowing, and acting on WMM to patients. Ultimately, asking WMM can be a powerful tool in advancing patient-centric care and building population health.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000489","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patient-centered care is paramount for optimal outcomes. To address this, at Meritus Health, we asked a simple, yet profound question: "What matters most to you? (WMM)" This question, integrated into the patients' electronic health records (EHRs), facilitates meaningful conversations and helps tailor care to align with patient goals. This initiative, grounded in the principles of Age-Friendly Healthcare from the John A. Hartford Foundation, underscores the power of information by enabling clinicians to gain a comprehensive understanding of their patients. Our implementation required significant teamwork and provider engagement. Over 3 years, we have recorded more than 65,000 responses, creating a strategic priority for the health system to personalize care, guide clinical decision making, and drive continuous improvement. This strategic priority is health system wide. Patient-facing units and departments all across the health system track and report monthly metrics on the number of WMM responses captured. In addition, many departments across the system lead quality-improvement projects to improve and refine the process of asking this question.

Methods: We assessed the patient responses to the WMM question to identify the frequency of common answers and also sought to review the implementation of the question process for learning.

Results: In our analysis of more than 65,000 patient responses, we categorized the answers into the top distinct groups with the top five categories identified being family and relationships (noted 38% of the time), well-being (22%), health concerns (15%), lifestyle (6%), and religion and faith (3%).

Conclusions: Asking and knowing WMM to patients offers more than just insight; it builds a meaningful conversation and relationship between the provider and patient in knowing the whole person. The top responses from patients are intuitively not surprising. The key to our questioning of the patients and the integration in the EHR are not the responses themselves, but the process of asking, knowing, and acting on WMM to patients. Ultimately, asking WMM can be a powerful tool in advancing patient-centric care and building population health.

什么对你重要,什么对我们重要:利用电子健康记录进行以病人为中心的护理的案例研究。
以患者为中心的护理是最重要的最佳结果。为了解决这个问题,我们在Meritus Health问了一个简单而深刻的问题:“对你来说,什么最重要?”(WMM)“这个问题被整合到患者的电子健康记录(EHRs)中,促进了有意义的对话,并有助于根据患者的目标量身定制护理。这一倡议以约翰·哈特福德基金会的老年友好型医疗保健原则为基础,强调了信息的力量,使临床医生能够全面了解患者。我们的实现需要重要的团队合作和提供者的参与。在3年多的时间里,我们记录了超过65,000份回复,为卫生系统制定了个性化护理、指导临床决策和推动持续改进的战略重点。这一战略重点是整个卫生系统。整个卫生系统面向患者的单位和部门每月跟踪并报告所捕获的WMM响应数量的指标。此外,整个系统的许多部门领导质量改进项目来改进和细化提出这个问题的过程。方法:我们评估了患者对WMM问题的回答,以确定常见答案的频率,并试图回顾问题学习过程的实施情况。结果:在我们对超过65,000名患者回答的分析中,我们将答案分为最明显的五类:家庭和关系(38%的时间),幸福(22%),健康问题(15%),生活方式(6%),宗教和信仰(3%)。结论:询问和了解WMM对患者提供的不仅仅是洞察力;它建立了一个有意义的对话和关系之间的提供者和病人了解整个人。从直觉上看,患者的最佳反应并不令人惊讶。我们对患者的提问和电子病历整合的关键不在于回答本身,而在于询问、了解和对患者采取WMM行动的过程。最终,询问WMM可以成为推进以患者为中心的护理和建立人口健康的有力工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Journal for Healthcare Quality HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as: Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信