A Brief Report Comparing Younger and Older Cohabitors.

IF 3.4 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Matthew R Wright, Susan L Brown, Wendy D Manning, Madelyn Flowers, Jenna M Ward
{"title":"A Brief Report Comparing Younger and Older Cohabitors.","authors":"Matthew R Wright, Susan L Brown, Wendy D Manning, Madelyn Flowers, Jenna M Ward","doi":"10.1111/jomf.13128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined age variation in relationship quality and stability, plans to marry, and reasons to cohabit among cohabiting adults in the U.S.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The landscape of cohabitation has changed in the past few decades as cohabitation has surged among older adults even as it has plateaued among younger people. Early research revealed key age-related variations in the meaning and relationship dynamics of cohabiting unions, but whether these patterns persist nowadays remains an empirical question.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were drawn from the nationally representative 2013 Families and Relationships Survey. The analytic sample was composed of cohabiting adults aged 18-65. Multivariable models investigated age group differences in relationship quality and stability, plans to marry, and reasons to cohabit net of relationship, demographic, and economic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As expected, relationship quality and stability tended to be higher among older than younger cohabitors. Older cohabitors were the least likely to have plans to marry and to view testing marital compatibility as an important reason for cohabiting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cohabitation appears to operate differently across the adult life course, functioning primarily as a prelude to marriage or alternative to singlehood earlier in the life course versus an alternative to marriage in later life.</p>","PeriodicalId":48440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marriage and Family","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12362635/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marriage and Family","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.13128","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study examined age variation in relationship quality and stability, plans to marry, and reasons to cohabit among cohabiting adults in the U.S.

Background: The landscape of cohabitation has changed in the past few decades as cohabitation has surged among older adults even as it has plateaued among younger people. Early research revealed key age-related variations in the meaning and relationship dynamics of cohabiting unions, but whether these patterns persist nowadays remains an empirical question.

Method: Data were drawn from the nationally representative 2013 Families and Relationships Survey. The analytic sample was composed of cohabiting adults aged 18-65. Multivariable models investigated age group differences in relationship quality and stability, plans to marry, and reasons to cohabit net of relationship, demographic, and economic factors.

Results: As expected, relationship quality and stability tended to be higher among older than younger cohabitors. Older cohabitors were the least likely to have plans to marry and to view testing marital compatibility as an important reason for cohabiting.

Conclusion: Cohabitation appears to operate differently across the adult life course, functioning primarily as a prelude to marriage or alternative to singlehood earlier in the life course versus an alternative to marriage in later life.

比较年轻和年长的同居者的简要报告。
目的:本研究调查了美国成年人同居关系质量和稳定性、结婚计划和同居原因的年龄变化。背景:在过去的几十年里,同居的情况发生了变化,老年人的同居人数激增,而年轻人的同居人数却趋于平稳。早期的研究揭示了同居关系的意义和关系动态中与年龄相关的关键变化,但这些模式是否在今天仍然存在仍然是一个实证问题。方法:数据来源于具有全国代表性的《2013年家庭与关系调查》。分析样本由18-65岁的同居成年人组成。多变量模型调查了关系质量和稳定性、结婚计划以及同居原因的年龄组差异,包括关系、人口统计和经济因素。结果:正如预期的那样,年龄较大的同居者关系质量和稳定性高于年龄较小的同居者。年龄较大的同居者有结婚计划的可能性最小,他们将检验婚姻是否和谐视为同居的一个重要原因。结论:同居在整个成人生活过程中的作用似乎不同,主要是作为婚姻的前奏,或者在生命过程的早期作为单身的替代品,而在晚年作为婚姻的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years, Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) has been a leading research journal in the family field. JMF features original research and theory, research interpretation and reviews, and critical discussion concerning all aspects of marriage, other forms of close relationships, and families.In 2009, an institutional subscription to Journal of Marriage and Family includes a subscription to Family Relations and Journal of Family Theory & Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信