A review evaluating the design and standardisation of rollators and smart-walkers to improve future products.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Wei Jim Shen, Blair Kuys, Amanda Clare Benson
{"title":"A review evaluating the design and standardisation of rollators and smart-walkers to improve future products.","authors":"Wei Jim Shen, Blair Kuys, Amanda Clare Benson","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2025.2547040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Four-wheeled walkers are widely used mobility aids for older adults. With the emergence of commercial smart-walkers, flaws in the design of rollators may carry over to the design of these emerging smart-walkers, necessitating a review of their design and standardisation. This review aims to evaluate how health, design, regulatory, research, and user factors intersect in the development and implementation of rollators and smart-walkers. It seeks to identify gaps in current standards, literature, and commercial products, with the goal of informing more user context-sensitive design and implementation approaches. The findings highlight limitations in current standardisation, regulatory and risk management frameworks for emerging commercial smart-walkers for personal and home use, and significant scope for improving rollator design to better reflect diverse user contexts, including device functionality, usability, and education. Additionally, the findings show that rollators and smart-walkers must evolve to adopt an inclusive design approach that prioritises ergonomic considerations, usability, safety, and the user's contextual relevance. This review underscores the importance of collaboration among health professionals, regulators, researchers, designers, and users to enhance rollator efficacy, usability, and safety. Future efforts in rollator and smart-walker design should incorporate structured feedback mechanisms and standardised evaluation tools to assess how users interact with devices and documentation. By addressing these factors, this review offers insights to guide the future design and implementation of rollators and smart-walkers, ensuring they better meet the needs, preferences and contexts of diverse users in personal and home settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"2433-2458"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2547040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Four-wheeled walkers are widely used mobility aids for older adults. With the emergence of commercial smart-walkers, flaws in the design of rollators may carry over to the design of these emerging smart-walkers, necessitating a review of their design and standardisation. This review aims to evaluate how health, design, regulatory, research, and user factors intersect in the development and implementation of rollators and smart-walkers. It seeks to identify gaps in current standards, literature, and commercial products, with the goal of informing more user context-sensitive design and implementation approaches. The findings highlight limitations in current standardisation, regulatory and risk management frameworks for emerging commercial smart-walkers for personal and home use, and significant scope for improving rollator design to better reflect diverse user contexts, including device functionality, usability, and education. Additionally, the findings show that rollators and smart-walkers must evolve to adopt an inclusive design approach that prioritises ergonomic considerations, usability, safety, and the user's contextual relevance. This review underscores the importance of collaboration among health professionals, regulators, researchers, designers, and users to enhance rollator efficacy, usability, and safety. Future efforts in rollator and smart-walker design should incorporate structured feedback mechanisms and standardised evaluation tools to assess how users interact with devices and documentation. By addressing these factors, this review offers insights to guide the future design and implementation of rollators and smart-walkers, ensuring they better meet the needs, preferences and contexts of diverse users in personal and home settings.

评估滚轮和智能步行者的设计和标准化,以改进未来的产品。
四轮助行器是老年人广泛使用的行动辅助工具。随着商业智能步行者的出现,滚动器设计中的缺陷可能会延续到这些新兴智能步行者的设计中,因此有必要对其设计和标准化进行审查。本综述旨在评估健康、设计、监管、研究和用户因素如何在卷筒和智能步行器的开发和实施中相互影响。它试图找出当前标准、文献和商业产品中的差距,目的是告知更多用户上下文敏感的设计和实现方法。研究结果强调了当前针对个人和家庭使用的新兴商业智能步行器的标准化、监管和风险管理框架的局限性,以及改进滚轮设计以更好地反映不同用户环境(包括设备功能、可用性和教育)的重大空间。此外,研究结果表明,自动扶梯和智能助行器必须采用包容性设计方法,优先考虑人体工程学、可用性、安全性和用户的上下文相关性。这篇综述强调了卫生专业人员、监管人员、研究人员、设计人员和用户之间合作的重要性,以提高滚筒的有效性、可用性和安全性。未来在滚轮和智能步行者设计方面的努力应该包括结构化的反馈机制和标准化的评估工具,以评估用户如何与设备和文档交互。通过解决这些因素,本综述为指导未来的滚动器和智能助行器的设计和实施提供了见解,确保它们更好地满足个人和家庭环境中不同用户的需求、偏好和环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信