A Descriptive Analysis of Tenant Right to Counsel Law and Praxis 2017-2024.

IF 2.9 3区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Housing Policy Debate Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-25 DOI:10.1080/10511482.2025.2467136
Emily A Benfer, Peter Hepburn, Valerie Nazarro, Leah Robinson, Jamila Michener, Danya E Keene
{"title":"A Descriptive Analysis of Tenant Right to Counsel Law and Praxis 2017-2024.","authors":"Emily A Benfer, Peter Hepburn, Valerie Nazarro, Leah Robinson, Jamila Michener, Danya E Keene","doi":"10.1080/10511482.2025.2467136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article provides the first comprehensive description of state and local tenant right to counsel (RTC) policies. From July 2017 through June 2024, five states, 17 cities, and one county passed legislation to formally create a right to legal counsel for tenants in eviction proceedings. These policies contain heterogeneous provisions, including their intended purposes, design and administration requirements, eligibility criteria, and when in the eviction process the right is triggered. This study describes laws as adopted in legislation through policy surveillance and legal mapping methods and examines how policies are executed on the ground through qualitative methods that capture the perspective of multiple stakeholders. The pairing of policy surveillance and legal mapping techniques with qualitative interviews demonstrates where real-world implementation both meets and diverges from legislative requirements and identifies barriers that prevent full implementation of the right to counsel, as well as its systemic benefits. In light of the dearth of national information on implementation of RTC programs, the descriptive, qualitative, and analytic framework detailed herein provides researchers, policymakers, and practitioners with instructive insights for evaluating, refining, and advancing RTC policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47744,"journal":{"name":"Housing Policy Debate","volume":"35 3","pages":"470-495"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12396838/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Policy Debate","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2025.2467136","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article provides the first comprehensive description of state and local tenant right to counsel (RTC) policies. From July 2017 through June 2024, five states, 17 cities, and one county passed legislation to formally create a right to legal counsel for tenants in eviction proceedings. These policies contain heterogeneous provisions, including their intended purposes, design and administration requirements, eligibility criteria, and when in the eviction process the right is triggered. This study describes laws as adopted in legislation through policy surveillance and legal mapping methods and examines how policies are executed on the ground through qualitative methods that capture the perspective of multiple stakeholders. The pairing of policy surveillance and legal mapping techniques with qualitative interviews demonstrates where real-world implementation both meets and diverges from legislative requirements and identifies barriers that prevent full implementation of the right to counsel, as well as its systemic benefits. In light of the dearth of national information on implementation of RTC programs, the descriptive, qualitative, and analytic framework detailed herein provides researchers, policymakers, and practitioners with instructive insights for evaluating, refining, and advancing RTC policies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

租客辩护权法律与实践描述性分析2017-2024。
本文首次全面描述了州和地方租户咨询权(RTC)政策。从2017年7月到2024年6月,五个州,17个城市和一个县通过了立法,正式为驱逐程序中的租户提供法律顾问的权利。这些政策包含不同的规定,包括其预期目的、设计和管理要求、资格标准,以及在驱逐过程中何时触发权利。本研究通过政策监督和法律制图方法描述立法中采用的法律,并通过捕捉多个利益相关者视角的定性方法考察政策在实地的执行情况。政策监督和法律制图技术与定性访谈相结合,显示了现实世界的执行既符合又偏离立法要求的地方,并确定了妨碍充分落实律师权利及其系统性利益的障碍。鉴于缺乏关于RTC项目实施的国家信息,本文详细介绍的描述性、定性和分析框架为研究人员、政策制定者和实践者提供了评估、完善和推进RTC政策的指导性见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
17.20%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Housing Policy Debate provides a venue for original research on U.S. housing policy. Subjects include affordable housing policy, fair housing policy, land use regulations influencing housing affordability, metropolitan development trends, and linkages among housing policy and energy, environmental, and transportation policy. Housing Policy Debate is published quarterly. Most issues feature a Forum section and an Articles section. The Forum, which highlights a current debate, features a central article and responding comments that represent a range of perspectives. All articles in the Forum and Articles sections undergo a double-blind peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信