Khalid Sawalha, Mohammad Alakchar, Mamas A Mamas, Dana Johnson, Adarsh Bhan, Andrew M Goldsweig
{"title":"Safety of cardioversion without anticoagulation in patients' status post left atrial appendage occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Khalid Sawalha, Mohammad Alakchar, Mamas A Mamas, Dana Johnson, Adarsh Bhan, Andrew M Goldsweig","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.08.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Direct current cardioversion (DCCV) is commonly used for rhythm control in atrial fibrillation (AF). Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) provides stroke prevention in patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulation (OAC), but the safety of DCCV without periprocedural anticoagulation in this group remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the safety of performing DCCV without systemic anticoagulation in patients with prior LAAO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library were searched (January 2010-April 2025). Studies comparing outcomes of patients undergoing DCCV after LAAO, with versus without subsequent anticoagulation, were included. Primary outcomes were thromboembolic events and clinically significant bleeding. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using random-effects modeling, with heterogeneity assessed via I<sup>2</sup> statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five observational studies (1697 DCCV procedures; 965 patients receiving post-DCCV anticoagulation) met inclusion criteria. Thromboembolic events occurred in 3.8 % of patients without OAC versus 1.6 % with OAC, with no statistically significant difference (OR 0.48; 95 % CI 0.16-1.43; p = 0.19; I<sup>2</sup> = 17 %). Clinically significant bleeding occurred in 4.1 % without OAC and 4.0 % with OAC, also without significant difference (OR 1.22; 95 % CI 0.75-2.00; p = 0.42; I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %). Pre-DCCV imaging protocols varied widely among studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In selected patients post-LAAO with no device-related thrombus or significant peri-device leak, DCCV without subsequent anticoagulation demonstrated low thromboembolic and bleeding risks. These findings, derived from limited observational data, require confirmation by randomized controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.08.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Direct current cardioversion (DCCV) is commonly used for rhythm control in atrial fibrillation (AF). Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) provides stroke prevention in patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulation (OAC), but the safety of DCCV without periprocedural anticoagulation in this group remains uncertain.
Objective: To evaluate the safety of performing DCCV without systemic anticoagulation in patients with prior LAAO.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library were searched (January 2010-April 2025). Studies comparing outcomes of patients undergoing DCCV after LAAO, with versus without subsequent anticoagulation, were included. Primary outcomes were thromboembolic events and clinically significant bleeding. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using random-effects modeling, with heterogeneity assessed via I2 statistic.
Results: Five observational studies (1697 DCCV procedures; 965 patients receiving post-DCCV anticoagulation) met inclusion criteria. Thromboembolic events occurred in 3.8 % of patients without OAC versus 1.6 % with OAC, with no statistically significant difference (OR 0.48; 95 % CI 0.16-1.43; p = 0.19; I2 = 17 %). Clinically significant bleeding occurred in 4.1 % without OAC and 4.0 % with OAC, also without significant difference (OR 1.22; 95 % CI 0.75-2.00; p = 0.42; I2 = 0 %). Pre-DCCV imaging protocols varied widely among studies.
Conclusions: In selected patients post-LAAO with no device-related thrombus or significant peri-device leak, DCCV without subsequent anticoagulation demonstrated low thromboembolic and bleeding risks. These findings, derived from limited observational data, require confirmation by randomized controlled trials.
期刊介绍：
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine (CRM) is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to revascularization therapies in cardiovascular medicine. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine publishes articles related to preclinical work and molecular interventions, including angiogenesis, cell therapy, pharmacological interventions, restenosis management, and prevention, including experiments conducted in human subjects, in laboratory animals, and in vitro. Specific areas of interest include percutaneous angioplasty in coronary and peripheral arteries, intervention in structural heart disease, cardiovascular surgery, etc.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
