Implications of Genetic Attributions for Addiction in Adults Affected by Alcohol Use Disorder and Gambling Disorder.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES
Addiction Research & Theory Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1080/16066359.2025.2468423
Matthew S Lebowitz, Shawn T Sorge, Rachel N Rattenni
{"title":"Implications of Genetic Attributions for Addiction in Adults Affected by Alcohol Use Disorder and Gambling Disorder.","authors":"Matthew S Lebowitz, Shawn T Sorge, Rachel N Rattenni","doi":"10.1080/16066359.2025.2468423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of the genome in the etiology of addictive disorders is increasingly emphasized, though the impact of this emphasis on people affected by addiction remains unclear. Furthering existing research on this topic, we sought to explore how attributing one's own addiction to genetic causes would relate to clinically relevant attitudes and beliefs, and whether any such impact would differ between people with substance addictions (alcohol use disorder in our sample) and those with behavioral addictions (gambling disorder in our sample).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals affected by gambling disorder (GD; N=60) or alcohol use disorder (AUD; n=53) completed a measure of their belief in a possible genetic basis for their addictive disorder, as well as measures of beliefs about the effectiveness of medication and psychotherapy, characterological self-blame, and beliefs about their ability to overcome their addictive disorder. A subset of 20 participants completed qualitative follow-up interviews to explore their perspectives in greater depth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the GD sample, but not in the AUD sample, genetic attributions were positively associated with characterological self-blame; no other quantitative variables showed significant associations with genetic attributions. In the interviews, several participants expressed views of a genetic explanation for addiction as suggesting a need for biomedical (pharmacological) treatment. There was a diversity of views about whether a genetic explanation would indicate blamelessness on the part of the individual patient, as well as whether it would connote limited agency to overcome addiction through behavioral self-control.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals with addictive disorders may endorse a variety of different perspectives about the implications of genetic explanations of addiction for treatment, self-efficacy, and blame, which may help to explain why quantitative associations between genetic attributions and other variables were not consistently observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47851,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Research & Theory","volume":"33 4","pages":"350-360"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12380008/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Research & Theory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2025.2468423","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The role of the genome in the etiology of addictive disorders is increasingly emphasized, though the impact of this emphasis on people affected by addiction remains unclear. Furthering existing research on this topic, we sought to explore how attributing one's own addiction to genetic causes would relate to clinically relevant attitudes and beliefs, and whether any such impact would differ between people with substance addictions (alcohol use disorder in our sample) and those with behavioral addictions (gambling disorder in our sample).

Methods: Individuals affected by gambling disorder (GD; N=60) or alcohol use disorder (AUD; n=53) completed a measure of their belief in a possible genetic basis for their addictive disorder, as well as measures of beliefs about the effectiveness of medication and psychotherapy, characterological self-blame, and beliefs about their ability to overcome their addictive disorder. A subset of 20 participants completed qualitative follow-up interviews to explore their perspectives in greater depth.

Results: In the GD sample, but not in the AUD sample, genetic attributions were positively associated with characterological self-blame; no other quantitative variables showed significant associations with genetic attributions. In the interviews, several participants expressed views of a genetic explanation for addiction as suggesting a need for biomedical (pharmacological) treatment. There was a diversity of views about whether a genetic explanation would indicate blamelessness on the part of the individual patient, as well as whether it would connote limited agency to overcome addiction through behavioral self-control.

Conclusions: Individuals with addictive disorders may endorse a variety of different perspectives about the implications of genetic explanations of addiction for treatment, self-efficacy, and blame, which may help to explain why quantitative associations between genetic attributions and other variables were not consistently observed.

受酒精使用障碍和赌博障碍影响的成人成瘾的遗传归因的含义。
背景:基因组在成瘾性疾病病因学中的作用越来越被强调,尽管这种强调对受成瘾影响的人的影响尚不清楚。在对这一主题的进一步研究中,我们试图探索将自己的成瘾归因于遗传原因如何与临床相关的态度和信念相关,以及这种影响是否会在物质成瘾者(我们样本中的酒精使用障碍)和行为成瘾者(我们样本中的赌博障碍)之间有所不同。方法:受赌博障碍(GD; N=60)或酒精使用障碍(AUD; N= 53)影响的个体完成了他们对成瘾障碍可能的遗传基础的信念,以及对药物和心理治疗有效性的信念,特征自责和对他们克服成瘾障碍能力的信念的测量。20名参与者的一个子集完成了定性随访访谈,以更深入地探讨他们的观点。结果:在GD样本中,遗传归因与特征性自责呈正相关,而在AUD样本中没有;没有其他数量变量显示出与遗传归因的显著关联。在访谈中,一些参与者表达了对成瘾的基因解释的观点,认为需要生物医学(药理学)治疗。关于基因解释是否表明个体患者是无可指责的,以及它是否意味着通过行为自我控制来克服成瘾的有限代理,存在多种观点。结论:成瘾性疾病的个体可能会对成瘾的治疗、自我效能和责备的遗传解释的含义有各种不同的观点,这可能有助于解释为什么遗传归因和其他变量之间的定量关联没有被一致地观察到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Since being founded in 1993, Addiction Research and Theory has been the leading outlet for research and theoretical contributions that view addictive behaviour as arising from psychological processes within the individual and the social context in which the behaviour takes place as much as from the biological effects of the psychoactive substance or activity involved. This cross-disciplinary journal examines addictive behaviours from a variety of perspectives and methods of inquiry. Disciplines represented in the journal include Anthropology, Economics, Epidemiology, Medicine, Sociology, Psychology and History, but high quality contributions from other relevant areas will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信