Social Work Faculty Perceptions on the Need for Inclusive LGBTQIA + Policies in Schools of Social Work.

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Daniel Jacobson López, Yan Yuan, Andrea Joseph-McCatty, Helen Petracchi, Mary Hawk
{"title":"Social Work Faculty Perceptions on the Need for Inclusive LGBTQIA + Policies in Schools of Social Work.","authors":"Daniel Jacobson López, Yan Yuan, Andrea Joseph-McCatty, Helen Petracchi, Mary Hawk","doi":"10.1007/s13178-024-01046-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Literature has found that LGBTQIA + faculty members experience discrimination both within the classroom and the larger academic environment, including decreased faculty collaboration, student support, and opportunities for promotion and tenure. However, few researchers have examined the experiences of LGBQ faculty within social work programs. Given this paucity in the literature, we examined the perceptions of faculty members in US social work schools regarding inclusive LGBTIA + policies, and how these policies influence the environments for and experiences of LGBQ faculty members.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This primary data collection consisted of a survey provided to social work faculty from the Baccalaureate Social Work Program Directors and the Master of Social Work Program Directors in 2017, consisting of 193 respondents. A multi-level path analysis with latent factors was conducted using structural equation modeling (SEM) in R.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that higher support was significantly associated with less phobia and fewer incidences; likewise, more intervention was significantly correlated with less phobia and fewer incidences. Additionally, more inclusive LGBTQIA + policies were associated with more interventions. Interestingly, the presence of more policies was linked with higher levels of reported phobia and more incidences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results encourage a need for active interventions to combat homophobia and racism within schools of social work.</p><p><strong>Policy implications: </strong>Additionally, the results support a need for inclusive LGBTQIA + policies with social work programs to support and create safe environments for LGBTQIA + faculty.</p>","PeriodicalId":47654,"journal":{"name":"Sexuality Research and Social Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12396566/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexuality Research and Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-024-01046-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Literature has found that LGBTQIA + faculty members experience discrimination both within the classroom and the larger academic environment, including decreased faculty collaboration, student support, and opportunities for promotion and tenure. However, few researchers have examined the experiences of LGBQ faculty within social work programs. Given this paucity in the literature, we examined the perceptions of faculty members in US social work schools regarding inclusive LGBTIA + policies, and how these policies influence the environments for and experiences of LGBQ faculty members.

Methods: This primary data collection consisted of a survey provided to social work faculty from the Baccalaureate Social Work Program Directors and the Master of Social Work Program Directors in 2017, consisting of 193 respondents. A multi-level path analysis with latent factors was conducted using structural equation modeling (SEM) in R.

Results: We found that higher support was significantly associated with less phobia and fewer incidences; likewise, more intervention was significantly correlated with less phobia and fewer incidences. Additionally, more inclusive LGBTQIA + policies were associated with more interventions. Interestingly, the presence of more policies was linked with higher levels of reported phobia and more incidences.

Conclusion: The results encourage a need for active interventions to combat homophobia and racism within schools of social work.

Policy implications: Additionally, the results support a need for inclusive LGBTQIA + policies with social work programs to support and create safe environments for LGBTQIA + faculty.

社会工作教师对社会工作学校包容性LGBTQIA +政策需求的看法。
引言:文献发现LGBTQIA +教师在课堂和更大的学术环境中都受到歧视,包括教师合作减少,学生支持减少,晋升和终身职位的机会减少。然而,很少有研究人员调查过LGBQ教师在社会工作项目中的经历。鉴于文献的缺乏,我们研究了美国社会工作学校教师对包容性LGBTIA +政策的看法,以及这些政策如何影响LGBTIA教师的环境和经历。方法:主要数据收集包括2017年向社会工作学院提供的社会工作学士学位项目主任和社会工作硕士项目主任的调查,包括193名受访者。采用结构方程模型(SEM)对潜在因素进行多层级通径分析。结果:支持度越高,恐惧程度越低,发病率越低;同样,更多的干预与更少的恐惧和更少的发病率显著相关。此外,更具包容性的LGBTQIA +政策与更多的干预措施相关。有趣的是,更多政策的存在与更高的恐惧水平和更高的发病率有关。结论:结果鼓励积极干预的需要,以打击同性恋恐惧症和种族主义在学校的社会工作。政策启示:此外,研究结果支持有必要制定包容性的LGBTQIA +政策和社会工作项目,为LGBTQIA +教师提供支持和创造安全的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexuality Research and Social Policy
Sexuality Research and Social Policy SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: Sexuality Research and Social Policy is an international multidisciplinary forum for the publication of original peer-reviewed state-of-the-art empirical research on sexuality, theoretical and methodological discussions, and the implications of this evidence for policies across the globe regarding sexual health, sexuality education, and sexual rights in diverse communities. The journal also publishes brief research and conference reports; white papers; book, film, and other reviews; together with guest editorials and commentaries. Sexuality Research and Social Policy occasionally publishes special issues on timely topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信