Ariane Levesque, Deepika Pugalenthi Saravanan, Peri Newman, Lauryn E Six, Yevgeniya Bamme, Smita Dandekar, Kate J Krause, Maria Chang Swartz, Gayle M Smink, Maxime Caru
{"title":"Physical Activity and Physical Fitness in Children and Adolescents Diagnosed With Sickle Cell Disease: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Ariane Levesque, Deepika Pugalenthi Saravanan, Peri Newman, Lauryn E Six, Yevgeniya Bamme, Smita Dandekar, Kate J Krause, Maria Chang Swartz, Gayle M Smink, Maxime Caru","doi":"10.1177/15598276251370338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Research on the benefits of physical activity (PA) for children diagnosed with sickle cell disease (SCD) remains divided. This scoping review aimed to describe PA and physical fitness assessments, detail existing PA interventions, and document adverse events related to PA interventions in children with SCD. <b>Methods:</b> We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and PEDro for clinical trials and observational studies on children ≤21 years old diagnosed with SCD and providing at least one assessment of PA and/or physical fitness and/or a PA intervention. <b>Results:</b> A total of 45 studies were included in this review. Only 28.9% of studies provided an assessment of PA, with the most common assessment being self-reported questionnaires. Most studies (ie, 88.9%) detailed using physical fitness assessments, with the most common being the 6-minute walk test. Two studies described a PA intervention, and one adverse event was reported. <b>Conclusion:</b> This scoping review indicated that approaches to assess PA and physical fitness in children with SCD are heterogenous and PA interventions in this population are limited. Conducting future research aiming to address these gaps is critical to allow for the formulation of PA guidelines that are specific to the needs/challenges of children with SCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":47480,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"15598276251370338"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12394228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15598276251370338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Research on the benefits of physical activity (PA) for children diagnosed with sickle cell disease (SCD) remains divided. This scoping review aimed to describe PA and physical fitness assessments, detail existing PA interventions, and document adverse events related to PA interventions in children with SCD. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and PEDro for clinical trials and observational studies on children ≤21 years old diagnosed with SCD and providing at least one assessment of PA and/or physical fitness and/or a PA intervention. Results: A total of 45 studies were included in this review. Only 28.9% of studies provided an assessment of PA, with the most common assessment being self-reported questionnaires. Most studies (ie, 88.9%) detailed using physical fitness assessments, with the most common being the 6-minute walk test. Two studies described a PA intervention, and one adverse event was reported. Conclusion: This scoping review indicated that approaches to assess PA and physical fitness in children with SCD are heterogenous and PA interventions in this population are limited. Conducting future research aiming to address these gaps is critical to allow for the formulation of PA guidelines that are specific to the needs/challenges of children with SCD.
关于身体活动(PA)对诊断为镰状细胞病(SCD)的儿童的益处的研究仍存在分歧。本综述旨在描述PA和身体健康评估,详细说明现有的PA干预措施,并记录与SCD儿童PA干预相关的不良事件。方法:我们检索MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane、Web of Science和PEDro,检索≤21岁诊断为SCD的儿童的临床试验和观察性研究,并提供至少一项PA和/或身体健康评估和/或PA干预。结果:本综述共纳入45项研究。只有28.9%的研究提供了PA的评估,最常见的评估是自我报告的问卷。大多数研究(即88.9%)详细使用身体健康评估,最常见的是6分钟步行测试。两项研究描述了PA干预,并报道了一个不良事件。结论:这一范围综述表明,评估SCD儿童PA和身体健康的方法是不同的,这一人群的PA干预是有限的。开展旨在解决这些差距的未来研究对于制定针对SCD儿童具体需求/挑战的PA指南至关重要。