Comparision of a Glove-Based Dressing Regimen with Conventional Dressings in Treatment of Superficial Partial-Thickness and Small Deep-Dermal Hand Burns.

IF 1.5 Q4 SURGERY
Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-24 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0045-1802330
Chandrashekhar Subhash Chalwade, Mudunuri Ravi Teja, Raghav Mago, Abhijeet D Sawant
{"title":"Comparision of a Glove-Based Dressing Regimen with Conventional Dressings in Treatment of Superficial Partial-Thickness and Small Deep-Dermal Hand Burns.","authors":"Chandrashekhar Subhash Chalwade, Mudunuri Ravi Teja, Raghav Mago, Abhijeet D Sawant","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1802330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In cases of burns affecting the hand, minimizing morbidity and disability is crucial. Early mobilization is essential to prevent persistent contractures and optimize functional outcomes by gradually improving range of motion. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of a glove-based dressing regimen in treating superficial partial-thickness and small deep-dermal hand burns compared to conventional dressings.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was conducted in a burn department affiliated with a tertiary care center over a period of 1 year between January 2018 and December 2018. A total of 75 digits (23 hands of 14 patients) were included in the study with 38 under a case group and 37 under a control group. The primary outcome of study was evaluated by assessing the edema, healing time, and mobility of the affected digit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean healing time in the case group was 12.4 days (range: 11-14, standard deviation [SD]: 0.992). The mean VAS (visual analog scale) score was 8.42 (range: 13-17, SD: 1.136). The percentage increase in mobility was 70.81% in the case group (glove dressing) as opposed to 46.57% in the control group (conventional dressing) at 10 days post-burn, which was statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sterile glove dressing techniques can be handy and a convenient method for dressing of hand burn injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":47204,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":"58 4","pages":"298-305"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12396869/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1802330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In cases of burns affecting the hand, minimizing morbidity and disability is crucial. Early mobilization is essential to prevent persistent contractures and optimize functional outcomes by gradually improving range of motion. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of a glove-based dressing regimen in treating superficial partial-thickness and small deep-dermal hand burns compared to conventional dressings.

Materials and methods: This study was conducted in a burn department affiliated with a tertiary care center over a period of 1 year between January 2018 and December 2018. A total of 75 digits (23 hands of 14 patients) were included in the study with 38 under a case group and 37 under a control group. The primary outcome of study was evaluated by assessing the edema, healing time, and mobility of the affected digit.

Results: Mean healing time in the case group was 12.4 days (range: 11-14, standard deviation [SD]: 0.992). The mean VAS (visual analog scale) score was 8.42 (range: 13-17, SD: 1.136). The percentage increase in mobility was 70.81% in the case group (glove dressing) as opposed to 46.57% in the control group (conventional dressing) at 10 days post-burn, which was statistically significant.

Conclusion: Sterile glove dressing techniques can be handy and a convenient method for dressing of hand burn injuries.

基于手套的敷料方案与传统敷料治疗浅表部分厚度和小的深皮肤手部烧伤的比较。
背景:在影响手部烧伤的病例中,尽量减少发病率和致残率是至关重要的。早期活动是必不可少的,以防止持续挛缩和优化功能结果,逐步提高活动范围。本研究的目的是确定与传统敷料相比,基于手套的敷料方案在治疗浅表部分厚度和小的深皮肤手部烧伤方面的疗效。材料和方法:本研究于2018年1月至2018年12月在一家三级护理中心的烧伤科进行,为期1年。共有75只手指(14名患者的23只手)被纳入研究,其中38只属于病例组,37只属于对照组。研究的主要结果是通过评估受累手指的水肿、愈合时间和活动能力来评估。结果:病例组平均愈合时间12.4 d(范围:11 ~ 14,标准差[SD]: 0.992)。VAS(视觉模拟量表)平均评分为8.42(范围:13-17,SD: 1.136)。在烧伤后10天,病例组(手套敷料)的活动能力增加百分比为70.81%,而对照组(常规敷料)的活动能力增加百分比为46.57%,这具有统计学意义。结论:无菌手套敷料技术是一种简便易行的手部烧伤敷料方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
64
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery (ISSN : 0970-0358) is biannual publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. Bibliographic listings: The journal is indexed with Bioline International, Caspur, DOAJ, EBSCO Publishing’s Electronic Databases, Expanded Academic ASAP, Genamics JournalSeek, Google Scholar, Health & Wellness Research Center, Health Reference Center Academic, Hinari, Index Copernicus, IndMed, OpenJGate, PubMed, Pubmed Central, Scimago Journal Ranking, SCOLOAR, SCOPUS, SIIC databases, SNEMB, Ulrich’s International Periodical Directory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信