Digital Platforms and Educational Tools for Enhancing Menstrual Health: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
International Journal of Sexual Health Pub Date : 2025-04-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/19317611.2025.2496218
Samantha Jimenez, Austin Lent, Sahar Kaleem, Nada Eldawy, Jennifer Mendonca, Madison Etzel, Paige Brinzo, Sara Burgoa, Yasmine Zerrouki, Tiffany Follin, Maria Mejia, Panagiota Kitsantas, Lea Sacca
{"title":"Digital Platforms and Educational Tools for Enhancing Menstrual Health: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Samantha Jimenez, Austin Lent, Sahar Kaleem, Nada Eldawy, Jennifer Mendonca, Madison Etzel, Paige Brinzo, Sara Burgoa, Yasmine Zerrouki, Tiffany Follin, Maria Mejia, Panagiota Kitsantas, Lea Sacca","doi":"10.1080/19317611.2025.2496218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Menstruating individuals have the right to access proper menstrual health education and hygiene practices. However, many of these individuals experience period poverty, which is defined as the lack of access to safe and hygienic menstrual products, basic sanitation services, adequate waste disposal systems, and menstrual hygiene education. Although the negative effects of period poverty on the physical, social, and mental well-being of menstruating adolescents have been emphasized and reported as a major public health issue, there remains a gap in research exploring the impact of evidence-based digital menstrual health educational tools on improving overall health outcomes and mental well-being of menstruating individuals. This scoping review aims to address this gap in period poverty and menstrual health research by exploring the availability of online educational intervention and digital platforms on menstrual health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was utilized as a reference checklist for this study. The Arksey and O'Malley Framework was used to guide the methodology for this review. The Joanna Briggs Institute recommendations were used for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results for the review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a full study review, seven studies were retained for analysis. The majority of the barriers were classified into the \"Study design and methodological issues\" (<i>n</i> = 10) theme category, which encompassed lack of validated tools for compliance, limited power, loss to follow-up, and inability to build evidence for causation among others. The second most cited barrier theme category was \"Generalizability and selection bias\" (<i>n</i> = 8). Lessons learned across included studies were identified regarding the use of social media, interventions, and period-tracking apps. Future interventions should consider individual preference for receiving materials (i.e., through web pages vs apps), cost-effectiveness, research methods to improve user engagement, and involve families and community members in improving attitudes and knowledge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings from this review will provide recommendations and inform future implementation and broader dissemination of such platforms for further improvement of menstrual health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46855,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sexual Health","volume":"37 3","pages":"350-368"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366815/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sexual Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2025.2496218","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Menstruating individuals have the right to access proper menstrual health education and hygiene practices. However, many of these individuals experience period poverty, which is defined as the lack of access to safe and hygienic menstrual products, basic sanitation services, adequate waste disposal systems, and menstrual hygiene education. Although the negative effects of period poverty on the physical, social, and mental well-being of menstruating adolescents have been emphasized and reported as a major public health issue, there remains a gap in research exploring the impact of evidence-based digital menstrual health educational tools on improving overall health outcomes and mental well-being of menstruating individuals. This scoping review aims to address this gap in period poverty and menstrual health research by exploring the availability of online educational intervention and digital platforms on menstrual health.

Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was utilized as a reference checklist for this study. The Arksey and O'Malley Framework was used to guide the methodology for this review. The Joanna Briggs Institute recommendations were used for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results for the review.

Results: After a full study review, seven studies were retained for analysis. The majority of the barriers were classified into the "Study design and methodological issues" (n = 10) theme category, which encompassed lack of validated tools for compliance, limited power, loss to follow-up, and inability to build evidence for causation among others. The second most cited barrier theme category was "Generalizability and selection bias" (n = 8). Lessons learned across included studies were identified regarding the use of social media, interventions, and period-tracking apps. Future interventions should consider individual preference for receiving materials (i.e., through web pages vs apps), cost-effectiveness, research methods to improve user engagement, and involve families and community members in improving attitudes and knowledge.

Conclusion: Findings from this review will provide recommendations and inform future implementation and broader dissemination of such platforms for further improvement of menstrual health outcomes.

促进月经健康的数字平台和教育工具:范围审查。
背景:经期个人有权获得适当的经期健康教育和卫生习惯。然而,其中许多人经历经期贫困,其定义为无法获得安全卫生的经期产品、基本卫生服务、适当的废物处理系统和经期卫生教育。尽管经期贫困对经期青少年的身体、社会和心理健康的负面影响已被强调和报道为一个主要的公共卫生问题,但在探索基于证据的数字经期健康教育工具对改善经期个体的整体健康结果和心理健康的影响方面,研究仍然存在空白。本次范围审查旨在通过探索在线教育干预和月经健康数字平台的可用性,解决月经贫困和月经健康研究中的这一差距。方法:采用系统评价和荟萃分析扩展范围评价首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)作为本研究的参考清单。Arksey和O'Malley框架被用来指导本综述的方法。乔安娜布里格斯研究所的建议被用于提取、分析和展示审查结果。结果:在完整的研究回顾后,保留了7项研究进行分析。大多数障碍被归类为“研究设计和方法问题”(n = 10)主题类别,其中包括缺乏有效的依从性工具,有限的权力,失去随访,以及无法建立因果关系的证据等。第二大被引用的障碍主题类别是“概括性和选择偏差”(n = 8)。从包括的研究中吸取的教训是关于社交媒体、干预措施和月经跟踪应用程序的使用。未来的干预措施应考虑个人对接收材料的偏好(即通过网页还是应用程序)、成本效益、提高用户参与度的研究方法,并让家庭和社区成员参与改善态度和知识。结论:本综述的发现将提供建议,并为未来实施和更广泛地传播此类平台提供信息,以进一步改善月经健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health, the International Journal of Sexual Health promotes sexual health as a state of physical, emotional, mental, and social well-being through a positive approach to sexuality and sexual rights. The journal publishes peer-reviewed scientific papers, editorials, and reviews, using quantitative and qualitative methods, descriptive and critical analysis, instrument development, surveys, and case studies to examine the essential elements of this broad concept. Leading experts from around the world present original work that covers a variety of disciplines, including sexology, biology, medicine, psychology, sociology, anthropology, history, and religion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信