A Four-Year Retrospective Study of Amniocentesis in a Tertiary Care Center in South India-Lessons Learnt.

IF 2.2 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Journal of Pregnancy Pub Date : 2025-08-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/jp/9983529
Jetti Gayatri Jahnavi, Roopa Padavagodu Shivananda, Akhila Vasudeva, Nivedita Hegde, Rashmi Natarajan
{"title":"A Four-Year Retrospective Study of Amniocentesis in a Tertiary Care Center in South India-Lessons Learnt.","authors":"Jetti Gayatri Jahnavi, Roopa Padavagodu Shivananda, Akhila Vasudeva, Nivedita Hegde, Rashmi Natarajan","doi":"10.1155/jp/9983529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Amniocentesis (AC) remains the most commonly performed prenatal invasive diagnostic test. The data available till now have been collected before the era of high-end ultrasound machines, NIPS, and chromosomal microarrays. In selected cases, whole-exome sequencing is also offered prenatally. The evolution of ultrasound, NIPS, and genetic testing has made us revisit this topic. <b>Objective:</b> We aimed to research and revisit AC data regarding the indications, procedures, genetic testing methods, and outcomes. We reinforce the knowledge of AC, offer tips to minimize complications, and help communicate and counsel patients based on the AC data. <b>Methods:</b> It was a retrospective study from October 2019 to March 2023 in a tertiary care fetal medicine center in a university hospital. A total of 321 patients who underwent AC were analyzed. We observed the demographic details, indications, procedure details, and maternal-fetal and neonatal outcomes. <b>Results:</b> During the study period, 321 patients underwent AC. Abnormal ultrasound findings (71%) were the most common indication for AC. Then, 9% (30/321) had abnormal genetic results. Down syndrome was the most common abnormality (14), followed by Edwards syndrome. Then, 47.96% of cases were in age > 35 years. We had three cases of bloody tap, one leak per vagina, and two missed abortions following AC. Then, 58% had live births. <b>Conclusion:</b> AC is a relatively safe procedure, and even with the advent of NIPS, it remains the gold standard prenatal diagnostic genetic testing method. Major structural anomalies and parental chromosomal anomalies are irreplaceable indications of AC. The technique and expertise of health professionals dictate the complication rate of that center. Chromosomal microarray, DNA storage, and whole-exome sequencing have added an extended armamentarium to our discovery of genetic diseases. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after AC are favorable, so do not hesitate to carry out this invasive test when indicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":47062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pregnancy","volume":"2025 ","pages":"9983529"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12393941/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pregnancy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/jp/9983529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Amniocentesis (AC) remains the most commonly performed prenatal invasive diagnostic test. The data available till now have been collected before the era of high-end ultrasound machines, NIPS, and chromosomal microarrays. In selected cases, whole-exome sequencing is also offered prenatally. The evolution of ultrasound, NIPS, and genetic testing has made us revisit this topic. Objective: We aimed to research and revisit AC data regarding the indications, procedures, genetic testing methods, and outcomes. We reinforce the knowledge of AC, offer tips to minimize complications, and help communicate and counsel patients based on the AC data. Methods: It was a retrospective study from October 2019 to March 2023 in a tertiary care fetal medicine center in a university hospital. A total of 321 patients who underwent AC were analyzed. We observed the demographic details, indications, procedure details, and maternal-fetal and neonatal outcomes. Results: During the study period, 321 patients underwent AC. Abnormal ultrasound findings (71%) were the most common indication for AC. Then, 9% (30/321) had abnormal genetic results. Down syndrome was the most common abnormality (14), followed by Edwards syndrome. Then, 47.96% of cases were in age > 35 years. We had three cases of bloody tap, one leak per vagina, and two missed abortions following AC. Then, 58% had live births. Conclusion: AC is a relatively safe procedure, and even with the advent of NIPS, it remains the gold standard prenatal diagnostic genetic testing method. Major structural anomalies and parental chromosomal anomalies are irreplaceable indications of AC. The technique and expertise of health professionals dictate the complication rate of that center. Chromosomal microarray, DNA storage, and whole-exome sequencing have added an extended armamentarium to our discovery of genetic diseases. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after AC are favorable, so do not hesitate to carry out this invasive test when indicated.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

南印度三级保健中心羊膜穿刺术四年回顾性研究——经验教训。
背景:羊膜穿刺术(AC)仍然是最常用的产前侵入性诊断检查。目前可用的数据是在高端超声仪器、NIPS和染色体微阵列时代之前收集的。在选定的情况下,全外显子组测序也提供产前。超声、NIPS和基因检测的发展使我们重新审视了这个话题。目的:我们旨在研究和回顾有关适应症、程序、基因检测方法和结果的AC数据。我们加强对AC的了解,提供减少并发症的提示,并根据AC数据帮助患者沟通和咨询。方法:对2019年10月至2023年3月在某大学医院三级胎儿医学中心进行回顾性研究。共分析了321例接受AC治疗的患者。我们观察了人口统计学细节、适应症、手术细节以及母胎和新生儿结局。结果:在研究期间,321例患者接受了AC,超声异常(71%)是AC最常见的适应症,9%(30/321)的患者有遗传异常。唐氏综合征是最常见的异常(14例),其次是爱德华兹综合征。47.96%的病例年龄在50 ~ 35岁之间。我们有3例阴道出血,1例阴道漏水,2例在AC后流产。然后,58%的人活产。结论:AC是一种相对安全的方法,即使NIPS的出现,它仍然是产前诊断基因检测的金标准。主要的结构异常和亲本染色体异常是AC不可替代的适应症。卫生专业人员的技术和专业知识决定了该中心的并发症发生率。染色体微阵列、DNA存储和全外显子组测序为我们发现遗传疾病增加了一个扩展的装备。AC术后的产妇和新生儿预后良好,因此在有指示的情况下,不要犹豫进行这种侵入性检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pregnancy
Journal of Pregnancy OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pregnancy is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on breastfeeding, labor, maternal health and the biomedical aspects of pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信