Development and Validation of an Algorithm for Item Reduction of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Examination to Determine Level and Severity of SCI.

IF 1.2 Q1 REHABILITATION
Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-22 DOI:10.46292/sci25-00008
Stephen P Burns, Kristen Walden, Steven Kirshblum, Mary Schmidt-Read, Keith Tansey, Christian Schuld, Ruediger Rupp
{"title":"Development and Validation of an Algorithm for Item Reduction of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Examination to Determine Level and Severity of SCI.","authors":"Stephen P Burns, Kristen Walden, Steven Kirshblum, Mary Schmidt-Read, Keith Tansey, Christian Schuld, Ruediger Rupp","doi":"10.46292/sci25-00008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2020, a first, expedited version of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (E-ISNCSCI-V1) was proposed for determination of neurological level of injury (NLI) and American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) classifications.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This work describes assessment of E-ISNCSCI-V1 classification accuracy and the development and data-based validation of an ISNCSCI Item Reduction Algorithm (IIRA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Classification accuracy for E-ISNCSCI-V1 examination shortcut options was assessed with automated analysis of 7026 full ISNCSCI examinations. Rules for the IIRA were iteratively adjusted to optimize the balance between omitting exam items and minimizing misclassification errors, and then it was validated through classification of 100 full ISNCSCI exams.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>If S1 findings are substituted for anorectal exam findings as proposed for E-ISNCSCI-V1, the error rate for AIS is 10%, with a high error rate (45%) for classifying true AIS B. The IIRA, which begins with full motor testing, followed by limited sensory testing required an average of 31% (42/134) of the full ISNCSCI exam items, with a 2% error rate for NLI and no AIS errors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The previously proposed E-ISNCSCI-V1, which included an option to substitute S1 findings for anorectal exam findings, is not recommended due to AIS error rate. The IIRA provides a standardized option for a shortened examination classifying NLI and AIS with high accuracy. It will serve as a basis for version 2 of the E-ISNCSCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":46769,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation","volume":"31 3","pages":"61-67"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12376155/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46292/sci25-00008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2020, a first, expedited version of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (E-ISNCSCI-V1) was proposed for determination of neurological level of injury (NLI) and American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) classifications.

Objectives: This work describes assessment of E-ISNCSCI-V1 classification accuracy and the development and data-based validation of an ISNCSCI Item Reduction Algorithm (IIRA).

Methods: Classification accuracy for E-ISNCSCI-V1 examination shortcut options was assessed with automated analysis of 7026 full ISNCSCI examinations. Rules for the IIRA were iteratively adjusted to optimize the balance between omitting exam items and minimizing misclassification errors, and then it was validated through classification of 100 full ISNCSCI exams.

Results: If S1 findings are substituted for anorectal exam findings as proposed for E-ISNCSCI-V1, the error rate for AIS is 10%, with a high error rate (45%) for classifying true AIS B. The IIRA, which begins with full motor testing, followed by limited sensory testing required an average of 31% (42/134) of the full ISNCSCI exam items, with a 2% error rate for NLI and no AIS errors.

Conclusion: The previously proposed E-ISNCSCI-V1, which included an option to substitute S1 findings for anorectal exam findings, is not recommended due to AIS error rate. The IIRA provides a standardized option for a shortened examination classifying NLI and AIS with high accuracy. It will serve as a basis for version 2 of the E-ISNCSCI.

一种用于确定脊髓损伤水平和严重程度的国际脊髓损伤神经分类检查标准项目缩减算法的开发和验证。
背景:2020年,第一个加速版国际脊髓损伤神经学分类标准(E-ISNCSCI-V1)被提出,用于确定神经损伤水平(NLI)和美国脊髓损伤协会损伤量表(AIS)分类。目的:本工作描述了E-ISNCSCI-V1分类准确性的评估以及ISNCSCI项目缩减算法(IIRA)的开发和基于数据的验证。方法:通过自动分析7026份完整的ISNCSCI检查,评估E-ISNCSCI-V1检查快捷选项的分类准确性。迭代调整IIRA规则,优化省略考试项目和最小化误分类错误之间的平衡,然后通过100个ISNCSCI完整考试的分类进行验证。结果:如果按照E-ISNCSCI-V1的建议,用S1检查结果代替肛肠检查结果,AIS的错误率为10%,对真正AIS b的分类错误率很高(45%)。IIRA从完整的运动测试开始,然后是有限的感觉测试,平均需要31%(42/134)的完整ISNCSCI检查项目,NLI错误率为2%,没有AIS错误。结论:由于AIS的错误率,先前提出的E-ISNCSCI-V1不推荐使用,其中包括用S1检查结果代替肛肠检查结果的选项。IIRA提供了一种标准化的选择,可以对NLI和AIS进行快速分类,准确率很高。它将作为E-ISNCSCI第2版的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Now in our 22nd year as the leading interdisciplinary journal of SCI rehabilitation techniques and care. TSCIR is peer-reviewed, practical, and features one key topic per issue. Published topics include: mobility, sexuality, genitourinary, functional assessment, skin care, psychosocial, high tetraplegia, physical activity, pediatric, FES, sci/tbi, electronic medicine, orthotics, secondary conditions, research, aging, legal issues, women & sci, pain, environmental effects, life care planning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信