Clinical-Biological Assessment of Prosthetic Field Following Pre-Prosthetic Phase Related to Prosthetic Treatment Solutions.

IF 2.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Petruţa Siminiuc, Doriana Agop-Forna, Cristina Dascălu, Norina Forna
{"title":"Clinical-Biological Assessment of Prosthetic Field Following Pre-Prosthetic Phase Related to Prosthetic Treatment Solutions.","authors":"Petruţa Siminiuc, Doriana Agop-Forna, Cristina Dascălu, Norina Forna","doi":"10.3390/clinpract15080140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>. Extensive partial edentulism alters the biological and functional balance of the stomatognathic system, requiring targeted pre-prosthetic procedures to optimize treatment outcomes. <b>Objectives</b>. The aim of this study was to assess the extent of improvement in the clinical-biological scores of the prosthetic field in patients with extensive edentulism, following pre-prosthetic interventions. <b>Materials and Method</b>. This prospective, cross-sectional study investigated 194 subjects with extensive partial edentulism. Clinical-biological scores, initially and following the pre-prosthetic phase, were recorded using a scoring system that evaluated dental and periodontal status, bone and mucosal support, occlusion, and mandibulo-cranial relationships. Statistical comparisons of clinical-biological scores were related to the type of prosthetic therapy. Statistical significance was considered at a <i>p</i>-value < 0.05. <b>Results</b>. There was an overall significant improvement in the clinical-biological scores initially (mean value 20.2) and after pre-prosthetic procedures (mean value 23.22) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). When treatment groups were divided, the implant-assisted prosthesis group showed the best improvement in all domains, followed by the conventional fixed-prostheses group (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Dental support improved significantly in those with semi-rigid composite prostheses (<i>p</i> = 0.014), while periodontal support was improved in both fixed- and hybrid-implant groups. Mucosal and bone support improved mostly in the fixed-implant groups (<i>p</i> = 0.014). <b>Conclusions</b>. Pre-prosthetic procedures significantly enhance the biological and functional readiness of the prosthetic field, with the degree of improvement influenced by the complexity and type of planned prosthetic rehabilitation. The findings underscore the value of individualized pre-prosthetic protocols as an essential component of prosthetic treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"15 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12384196/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract15080140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Extensive partial edentulism alters the biological and functional balance of the stomatognathic system, requiring targeted pre-prosthetic procedures to optimize treatment outcomes. Objectives. The aim of this study was to assess the extent of improvement in the clinical-biological scores of the prosthetic field in patients with extensive edentulism, following pre-prosthetic interventions. Materials and Method. This prospective, cross-sectional study investigated 194 subjects with extensive partial edentulism. Clinical-biological scores, initially and following the pre-prosthetic phase, were recorded using a scoring system that evaluated dental and periodontal status, bone and mucosal support, occlusion, and mandibulo-cranial relationships. Statistical comparisons of clinical-biological scores were related to the type of prosthetic therapy. Statistical significance was considered at a p-value < 0.05. Results. There was an overall significant improvement in the clinical-biological scores initially (mean value 20.2) and after pre-prosthetic procedures (mean value 23.22) (p < 0.001). When treatment groups were divided, the implant-assisted prosthesis group showed the best improvement in all domains, followed by the conventional fixed-prostheses group (p < 0.01). Dental support improved significantly in those with semi-rigid composite prostheses (p = 0.014), while periodontal support was improved in both fixed- and hybrid-implant groups. Mucosal and bone support improved mostly in the fixed-implant groups (p = 0.014). Conclusions. Pre-prosthetic procedures significantly enhance the biological and functional readiness of the prosthetic field, with the degree of improvement influenced by the complexity and type of planned prosthetic rehabilitation. The findings underscore the value of individualized pre-prosthetic protocols as an essential component of prosthetic treatment planning.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

与假体治疗方案相关的预假体阶段后假体场的临床生物学评估。
背景。广泛的局部全牙症改变了口颌系统的生物学和功能平衡,需要有针对性的预修复手术来优化治疗效果。目标。本研究的目的是评估假牙患者在假牙前干预后,假牙领域临床生物学评分的改善程度。材料和方法。这项前瞻性的横断面研究调查了194名患有广泛性部分全牙症的受试者。临床生物学评分,最初和之后的假体前期,记录使用评分系统,评估牙齿和牙周状态,骨和粘膜支持,咬合,下颌-颅关系。临床生物学评分的统计比较与假体治疗的类型有关。p值< 0.05认为有统计学意义。结果。临床生物学评分在初始(平均值20.2)和预修复手术后(平均值23.22)均有显著改善(p < 0.001)。按治疗组划分,种植体辅助修复体组各领域改善效果最好,常规固定修复体组次之(p < 0.01)。半刚性复合种植体组的牙周支持明显改善(p = 0.014),固定种植体组和混合种植体组的牙周支持均有改善。固定种植体组粘膜和骨支持改善最多(p = 0.014)。结论。预修复程序显著提高了假体领域的生物学和功能准备程度,其改善程度受计划的假体康复的复杂性和类型的影响。研究结果强调了个性化的预假体方案作为假体治疗计划的重要组成部分的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinics and Practice
Clinics and Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信