Creating and Validating a Questionnaire on Dentists' Perceptions Regarding Periodontics-Prosthodontics Interdisciplinary Clinical Practice.

IF 2.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Gabriel Rotundu, Dragos Ioan Virvescu, Zinovia Surlari, Dana Gabriela Budala, Florin Razvan Curca, Carina Balcos, Cristian Cojocaru, Vlad Constantin, Razvan Gradinariu, Ionut Luchian
{"title":"Creating and Validating a Questionnaire on Dentists' Perceptions Regarding Periodontics-Prosthodontics Interdisciplinary Clinical Practice.","authors":"Gabriel Rotundu, Dragos Ioan Virvescu, Zinovia Surlari, Dana Gabriela Budala, Florin Razvan Curca, Carina Balcos, Cristian Cojocaru, Vlad Constantin, Razvan Gradinariu, Ionut Luchian","doi":"10.3390/clinpract15080149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The interaction between prosthetic restorations and periodontal health is a critical factor for the long-term success of dental treatments. A biologically compatible prosthetic design supports periodontal stability, whereas neglecting periodontal principles can compromise treatment outcomes. This study aimed to validate a questionnaire designed to assess dentists' perceptions regarding the influence of prosthetic restorations on the periodontium. <b>Material and Methods:</b> An observational cross-sectional study was conducted using a self-administered questionnaire distributed to licensed dentists across Romania. The questionnaire underwent expert review, pilot testing (<i>n</i> = 50), and statistical validation, including the Content Validity Index (CVI), Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency, and Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) with Varimax rotation. The final sample included 39 respondents. Data was analyzed using SPSS v26.0. <b>Results:</b> The questionnaire demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.900; standardized alpha = 0.917). Most items had corrected item-total correlations > 0.40. EFA revealed eight coherent factors explaining 81.68% of total variance, with high communalities (0.549-0.966), strong Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test (KMO) values, and significant Bartlett's test values, confirming construct validity. Descriptive statistics showed predominantly positive attitudes among dentists regarding the periodontal considerations in prosthetic treatment. The highest-rated items emphasized oral hygiene, periodontal stability, and biological adaptation of restorations. Lower scores were associated with routine use of periodontal indices and recognition of failures due to insufficient evaluation. <b>Conclusions:</b> The validated instrument proved reliable and demonstrated strong psychometric properties in this exploratory validation, supporting its use in research and education. Romanian dentists demonstrated a favorable perception of the role of periodontal health in prosthetic success. This tool can inform curriculum development and interdisciplinary clinical protocols in prosthodontics and periodontology.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"15 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12384427/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract15080149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The interaction between prosthetic restorations and periodontal health is a critical factor for the long-term success of dental treatments. A biologically compatible prosthetic design supports periodontal stability, whereas neglecting periodontal principles can compromise treatment outcomes. This study aimed to validate a questionnaire designed to assess dentists' perceptions regarding the influence of prosthetic restorations on the periodontium. Material and Methods: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted using a self-administered questionnaire distributed to licensed dentists across Romania. The questionnaire underwent expert review, pilot testing (n = 50), and statistical validation, including the Content Validity Index (CVI), Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency, and Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) with Varimax rotation. The final sample included 39 respondents. Data was analyzed using SPSS v26.0. Results: The questionnaire demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.900; standardized alpha = 0.917). Most items had corrected item-total correlations > 0.40. EFA revealed eight coherent factors explaining 81.68% of total variance, with high communalities (0.549-0.966), strong Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test (KMO) values, and significant Bartlett's test values, confirming construct validity. Descriptive statistics showed predominantly positive attitudes among dentists regarding the periodontal considerations in prosthetic treatment. The highest-rated items emphasized oral hygiene, periodontal stability, and biological adaptation of restorations. Lower scores were associated with routine use of periodontal indices and recognition of failures due to insufficient evaluation. Conclusions: The validated instrument proved reliable and demonstrated strong psychometric properties in this exploratory validation, supporting its use in research and education. Romanian dentists demonstrated a favorable perception of the role of periodontal health in prosthetic success. This tool can inform curriculum development and interdisciplinary clinical protocols in prosthodontics and periodontology.

创建和验证一份关于牙医对牙周病-修复学跨学科临床实践的看法的问卷。
背景:修复体与牙周健康之间的相互作用是口腔治疗长期成功的关键因素。生物相容的假体设计支持牙周稳定性,而忽视牙周原则可能会影响治疗结果。本研究旨在验证一份问卷,旨在评估牙医对假体修复对牙周组织的影响的看法。材料和方法:一项观察性横断面研究使用自我管理的调查问卷分发给罗马尼亚各地的执业牙医。问卷经过专家评审、试点检验(n = 50)和统计验证,包括内容效度指数(CVI)、内部一致性的Cronbach's alpha和使用主成分分析(PCA)的探索性因子分析(EFA)。最终样本包括39名受访者。数据分析使用SPSS v26.0。结果:问卷具有良好的内部一致性(Cronbach’s alpha = 0.900,标准化alpha = 0.917)。大多数项目有修正的项目总相关性>.40。EFA显示8个相关因子解释了81.68%的总方差,具有较高的共同性(0.549 ~ 0.966),KMO检验值较强,Bartlett检验值显著,证实了结构效度。描述性统计显示,牙医对牙周修复治疗的考虑主要是积极的态度。评价最高的项目强调口腔卫生、牙周稳定性和修复体的生物适应性。较低的评分与常规牙周指数的使用和由于评估不足而导致的失败的认识有关。结论:经验证的仪器在探索性验证中证明是可靠的,并显示出强大的心理测量特性,支持其在研究和教育中的使用。罗马尼亚牙医对牙周健康在假体成功中的作用表现出良好的看法。该工具可以为口腔修复学和牙周学的课程开发和跨学科临床协议提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinics and Practice
Clinics and Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信