Alyssa N Van Denburg, Laura S Porter, Tamara J Somers, Francis J Keefe, Christine Rini
{"title":"Significant Other Support and Hindrance for Intervention Tasks: Implications for Interventions to Improve Health and Well-Being.","authors":"Alyssa N Van Denburg, Laura S Porter, Tamara J Somers, Francis J Keefe, Christine Rini","doi":"10.1037/cfp0000271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pain coping skills training (PCST) is the predominant behavioral intervention for chronic pain. Benefiting from PCST necessitates that individuals not only complete the training sessions but also integrate the new skills into their daily lives. However, the extent to which the social context influences the ability to use and benefit from this training is not yet fully understood. This study assessed social support and hindrance from significant others in individuals with hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA) and associated pain (<i>N</i> = 55). Participants completed an 8-session, internet-based PCST program as part of a randomized controlled trial using a measure developed for this study of social support and hindrance for intervention tasks. Our findings revealed that participants expected more support than they received (<i>p</i> < .001) and that lower pre-intervention expectations of hindrance correlated with less hindrance received (<i>p</i> = .047). Hierarchical regression models showed that expected and received support and hindrance were not associated with regular skill use, although having a college education or higher was associated with this outcome (<i>β</i> = .50, <i>p</i> = .001). Expected and received support and hindrance did not account for a significant proportion of the variation in changes in pain intensity or pain-related interference with functioning. In contrast, received support was associated with greater change in self-efficacy for pain management, controlling for other variables in the model (<i>β</i> = .40, <i>p</i> = .01), underscoring a unique role for received support in relation to improvements in confidence for managing OA pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":45636,"journal":{"name":"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12392542/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Pain coping skills training (PCST) is the predominant behavioral intervention for chronic pain. Benefiting from PCST necessitates that individuals not only complete the training sessions but also integrate the new skills into their daily lives. However, the extent to which the social context influences the ability to use and benefit from this training is not yet fully understood. This study assessed social support and hindrance from significant others in individuals with hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA) and associated pain (N = 55). Participants completed an 8-session, internet-based PCST program as part of a randomized controlled trial using a measure developed for this study of social support and hindrance for intervention tasks. Our findings revealed that participants expected more support than they received (p < .001) and that lower pre-intervention expectations of hindrance correlated with less hindrance received (p = .047). Hierarchical regression models showed that expected and received support and hindrance were not associated with regular skill use, although having a college education or higher was associated with this outcome (β = .50, p = .001). Expected and received support and hindrance did not account for a significant proportion of the variation in changes in pain intensity or pain-related interference with functioning. In contrast, received support was associated with greater change in self-efficacy for pain management, controlling for other variables in the model (β = .40, p = .01), underscoring a unique role for received support in relation to improvements in confidence for managing OA pain.
期刊介绍:
Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice ® (CFP) is a scholarly journal publishing peer-reviewed papers representing the science and practice of family psychology. CFP is the official publication of APA Division 43 (Society for Couple and Family Psychology) and is intended to be a forum for scholarly dialogue regarding the most important emerging issues in the field, a primary outlet for research particularly as it impacts practice and for papers regarding education, public policy, and the identity of the profession of family psychology. As the official journal for the Society, CFP will provide a home for the members of the division and those in other fields interested in the most cutting edge issues in family psychology. Unlike other journals in the field, CFP is focused specifically on family psychology as a specialty practice, unique scientific domain, and critical element of psychological knowledge. CFP will seek and publish scholarly manuscripts that make a contribution to the knowledge base of family psychology specifically, and the science and practice of working with individuals, couples and families from a family systems perspective in general.