How Can the Law Keep Up? The Challenges in Regulating Health Innovations through the Lens of Embryo Research.

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW
Journal of Law and Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-01
Tamra Lysaght, Dianne Nicol, Christopher Rudge, Narcyz Ghinea, Bernadette Richards
{"title":"How Can the Law Keep Up? The Challenges in Regulating Health Innovations through the Lens of Embryo Research.","authors":"Tamra Lysaght, Dianne Nicol, Christopher Rudge, Narcyz Ghinea, Bernadette Richards","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human embryo research can provide important scientific insights to enhance medical knowledge, improve health care and advance human flourishing. This research also poses unresolved legal and ethical questions. Since 2002, Australia has had legislation in place that limits the use of human embryos for research through strict licensing conditions. However, there has been no formal review of these laws in almost 15 years and the scientific landscape has shifted dramatically. The development of stem cell-based embryo models that closely resemble human embryos, and culturing techniques that allow human embryos to be grown to potentially beyond 14-days post-fertilisation, is pushing the limits of the current legislative framework. We argue that a comprehensive review is needed to address recent scientific developments and to better account for contemporary public values.</p>","PeriodicalId":45522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Medicine","volume":"32 2","pages":"307-322"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human embryo research can provide important scientific insights to enhance medical knowledge, improve health care and advance human flourishing. This research also poses unresolved legal and ethical questions. Since 2002, Australia has had legislation in place that limits the use of human embryos for research through strict licensing conditions. However, there has been no formal review of these laws in almost 15 years and the scientific landscape has shifted dramatically. The development of stem cell-based embryo models that closely resemble human embryos, and culturing techniques that allow human embryos to be grown to potentially beyond 14-days post-fertilisation, is pushing the limits of the current legislative framework. We argue that a comprehensive review is needed to address recent scientific developments and to better account for contemporary public values.

法律如何跟上?从胚胎研究的角度调控健康创新的挑战。
人类胚胎研究可以为增进医学知识、改善卫生保健和促进人类繁荣提供重要的科学见解。这项研究也提出了尚未解决的法律和伦理问题。自2002年以来,澳大利亚已经制定了立法,通过严格的许可条件限制人类胚胎用于研究。然而,近15年来一直没有对这些法律进行正式审查,科学景观发生了巨大变化。基于干细胞的、与人类胚胎非常相似的胚胎模型的发展,以及允许人类胚胎在受精后生长到14天以上的培养技术,正在挑战当前立法框架的极限。我们认为,需要进行全面的审查,以解决最近的科学发展,并更好地解释当代公共价值观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信