Bayesian Estimation of Propensity Scores for Integrating Multiple Cohorts with High-Dimensional Covariates.

IF 0.4 Q4 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Subharup Guha, Yi Li
{"title":"Bayesian Estimation of Propensity Scores for Integrating Multiple Cohorts with High-Dimensional Covariates.","authors":"Subharup Guha, Yi Li","doi":"10.1007/s12561-024-09470-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comparative meta-analyses of groups of subjects by integrating multiple observational studies rely on estimated propensity scores (PSs) to mitigate covariate imbalances. However, PS estimation grapples with the theoretical and practical challenges posed by high-dimensional covariates. Motivated by an integrative analysis of breast cancer patients across seven medical centers, this paper tackles the challenges of integrating multiple observational datasets. The proposed inferential technique, called Bayesian Motif Submatrices for Covariates (B-MSC), addresses the curse of dimensionality by a hybrid of Bayesian and frequentist approaches. B-MSC uses nonparametric Bayesian \"Chinese restaurant\" processes to eliminate redundancy in the high-dimensional covariates and discover latent <i>motifs</i> or lower-dimensional structures. With these motifs as potential predictors, standard regression techniques can be utilized to accurately infer the PSs and facilitate covariate-balanced group comparisons. Simulations and meta-analysis of the motivating cancer investigation demonstrate the efficacy of the B-MSC approach to accurately estimate the propensity scores and efficiently address covariate imbalance when integrating observational health studies with high-dimensional covariates.</p>","PeriodicalId":45094,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Biosciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12320959/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Biosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12561-024-09470-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comparative meta-analyses of groups of subjects by integrating multiple observational studies rely on estimated propensity scores (PSs) to mitigate covariate imbalances. However, PS estimation grapples with the theoretical and practical challenges posed by high-dimensional covariates. Motivated by an integrative analysis of breast cancer patients across seven medical centers, this paper tackles the challenges of integrating multiple observational datasets. The proposed inferential technique, called Bayesian Motif Submatrices for Covariates (B-MSC), addresses the curse of dimensionality by a hybrid of Bayesian and frequentist approaches. B-MSC uses nonparametric Bayesian "Chinese restaurant" processes to eliminate redundancy in the high-dimensional covariates and discover latent motifs or lower-dimensional structures. With these motifs as potential predictors, standard regression techniques can be utilized to accurately infer the PSs and facilitate covariate-balanced group comparisons. Simulations and meta-analysis of the motivating cancer investigation demonstrate the efficacy of the B-MSC approach to accurately estimate the propensity scores and efficiently address covariate imbalance when integrating observational health studies with high-dimensional covariates.

整合具有高维协变量的多队列的贝叶斯倾向得分估计。
通过整合多个观察性研究对受试者群体进行比较荟萃分析,依赖于估计的倾向得分(PSs)来减轻协变量失衡。然而,PS估计面临着高维协变量带来的理论和实践挑战。在对七个医疗中心的乳腺癌患者进行综合分析的激励下,本文解决了整合多个观察数据集的挑战。提出的推理技术,称为贝叶斯基序子矩阵协变量(B-MSC),通过贝叶斯和频率方法的混合解决了维数的诅咒。B-MSC使用非参数贝叶斯“中国餐馆”过程来消除高维协变量中的冗余,并发现潜在的基序或低维结构。有了这些基序作为潜在的预测因子,标准回归技术可以用来准确地推断PSs,并促进协变量平衡组比较。对激励性癌症调查的模拟和荟萃分析表明,当将观察性健康研究与高维协变量整合时,B-MSC方法在准确估计倾向得分和有效解决协变量失衡方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Statistics in Biosciences
Statistics in Biosciences MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Statistics in Biosciences (SIBS) is published three times a year in print and electronic form. It aims at development and application of statistical methods and their interface with other quantitative methods, such as computational and mathematical methods, in biological and life science, health science, and biopharmaceutical and biotechnological science. SIBS publishes scientific papers and review articles in four sections, with the first two sections as the primary sections. Original Articles publish novel statistical and quantitative methods in biosciences. The Bioscience Case Studies and Practice Articles publish papers that advance statistical practice in biosciences, such as case studies, innovative applications of existing methods that further understanding of subject-matter science, evaluation of existing methods and data sources. Review Articles publish papers that review an area of statistical and quantitative methodology, software, and data sources in biosciences. Commentaries provide perspectives of research topics or policy issues that are of current quantitative interest in biosciences, reactions to an article published in the journal, and scholarly essays. Substantive science is essential in motivating and demonstrating the methodological development and use for an article to be acceptable. Articles published in SIBS share the goal of promoting evidence-based real world practice and policy making through effective and timely interaction and communication of statisticians and quantitative researchers with subject-matter scientists in biosciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信