Polarization and rule of law crisis-insights from Poland.

IF 0.7 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Magdalena Solska
{"title":"Polarization and rule of law crisis-insights from Poland.","authors":"Magdalena Solska","doi":"10.1007/s12286-025-00630-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most scholarly arguments related to the judicial reform in Poland highlight intentional demolition of democratic standards by the PiS-led government and the subordination of the judiciary to the executive. This article puts forward a theoretical argument that factors polarizing strategy of incumbents and opposition into the analysis of the rule of law crisis. Whereas PiS-led government is responsible for devastation of the judiciary undermining the rule of law in the country, the new government's continued polarizing strategy is counterproductive to the strengthening of the rule of law. This is linked to the very nature of rule of law, which implies an unwritten compromise between legal and political elite regarding their role in law creation in the constitutional praxis.</p>","PeriodicalId":44200,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft","volume":"19 2","pages":"201-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12391201/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-025-00630-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most scholarly arguments related to the judicial reform in Poland highlight intentional demolition of democratic standards by the PiS-led government and the subordination of the judiciary to the executive. This article puts forward a theoretical argument that factors polarizing strategy of incumbents and opposition into the analysis of the rule of law crisis. Whereas PiS-led government is responsible for devastation of the judiciary undermining the rule of law in the country, the new government's continued polarizing strategy is counterproductive to the strengthening of the rule of law. This is linked to the very nature of rule of law, which implies an unwritten compromise between legal and political elite regarding their role in law creation in the constitutional praxis.

两极分化与法治危机——来自波兰的洞察。
大多数与波兰司法改革相关的学术争论都强调了pis领导的政府有意破坏民主标准,并将司法从属于行政。本文在分析法治危机的过程中,提出了将在任者和反对派的两极分化策略纳入分析的理论论证。法律与公正党领导的政府对破坏法治的司法系统负有责任,而新政府持续的两极分化战略对加强法治起到了反作用。这与法治的本质有关,这意味着法律和政治精英之间就宪法实践中他们在法律创造中的作用达成了不成文的妥协。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
13.30%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Comparative Governance and Politics – Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft (ZfVP) was founded in 2007. It is an internationally renowned journal that adheres to the highest standards of quality (double-blind peer review). The journal is published quarterly, and it is the first bilingual (German and English) journal that focuses on innovative research results in the area of comparative politics. The journal is a central academic forum for outstanding research achievements in the field of comparative politics, and covers the entire range of comparative research within the field. The journal publishes conceptual, methodological, and empirical studies from all the various research areas within the discipline of political science. Special Issues and Special Sections Special Issues and Special Sections offer the opportunity to present focal topics of comparative research. All submissions undergo a double-blind peer review procedure, which is conducted within the scope of a consultation between the author and the editors through our online submission system. The editors will also initiate the creation of potential special issues through open calls for papers. At the same time, the editors always appreciate suggestions and initiatives from the comparative studies community. Proposals for Special Issues and Special Sections are also subjected to an internal evaluation process. Our Special Issues are published as one of the four quarterly issues and usually consist of six to ten articles, accompanied by an introduction written by the guest editor(s). Special Sections, on the other hand, are a topical focus in one of the four quarterly issues, consisting of three to five articles, which are supplemented by a guest editor’s preface.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书