Femoral Neck Complications in Isolated Femoral Neck Fractures Versus Ipsilateral Femoral Neck and Shaft Fractures.

IF 2.1 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Jeremy Hreha, Thomas M Large, Brian Batko, Janice M Bonsu, Ujjawal Savani, Helyn Fraser, Emily Wild, Dhruv Mendiratta, Mark R Adams
{"title":"Femoral Neck Complications in Isolated Femoral Neck Fractures Versus Ipsilateral Femoral Neck and Shaft Fractures.","authors":"Jeremy Hreha, Thomas M Large, Brian Batko, Janice M Bonsu, Ujjawal Savani, Helyn Fraser, Emily Wild, Dhruv Mendiratta, Mark R Adams","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There are limited data on the difference in outcomes between patients with isolated femoral neck fractures (IsoFN) and those with a femoral neck and ipsilateral femoral shaft fracture (IpsiFNS) in terms of osteonecrosis, nonunion, and revision surgery rates. We hypothesized that displaced IsoFN fractures would have higher rates of femoral neck nonunion, osteonecrosis, and hip revision surgery than displaced IpsiFNS fractures. Comparisons were made to determine the relationship between these outcomes and other variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients age 18 to 55 years from 2005 to 2020 at two level-I trauma academic institutions was performed, identifying 107 patients in total (IpsiFNS 51, IsoFN 56). The review analyzed the rates of displacement, osteonecrosis, nonunion, and revision surgery. Further comparisons were made to determine the effect of reduction quality, fixation method, and reduction type on these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with displaced IsoFN had a significantly higher nonunion, revision surgery and osteonecrosis rate (38.5%, 38.5%, 17.3%) than in patients with IpsiFNS (6.7%, 13.3%, 0%; P = 0.004, P = 0.010, P = 0.016 respectively). There was a relationship between nonunion and femoral neck fixation with fully threaded screws (P = 0.036 and P = 0.004). Among patients who underwent an open reduction, nonunion rates were significantly higher for displaced IsoFN than for displaced IpsiFNS (7.4% vs. 43.2%, P = 0.008). Osteonecrosis rates had a relationship with reduction quality (P = 0.044).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with a displaced isolated femoral neck fractures are at higher risk for nonunion, osteonecrosis, and revision surgery than those with a displaced femoral neck fracture associated with an IpsiFNS. Quality of reduction had a relationship with osteonecrosis rates. An open approach to the neck reduction was associated with nonunion at a higher rate in displaced IsoFN than in displaced IpsiFNS. A fixation construct of multiple cancellous independent screws that included fully threaded screws had higher odds for nonunion.</p>","PeriodicalId":45062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","volume":"9 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12393214/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: There are limited data on the difference in outcomes between patients with isolated femoral neck fractures (IsoFN) and those with a femoral neck and ipsilateral femoral shaft fracture (IpsiFNS) in terms of osteonecrosis, nonunion, and revision surgery rates. We hypothesized that displaced IsoFN fractures would have higher rates of femoral neck nonunion, osteonecrosis, and hip revision surgery than displaced IpsiFNS fractures. Comparisons were made to determine the relationship between these outcomes and other variables.

Methods: A retrospective review of patients age 18 to 55 years from 2005 to 2020 at two level-I trauma academic institutions was performed, identifying 107 patients in total (IpsiFNS 51, IsoFN 56). The review analyzed the rates of displacement, osteonecrosis, nonunion, and revision surgery. Further comparisons were made to determine the effect of reduction quality, fixation method, and reduction type on these outcomes.

Results: Patients with displaced IsoFN had a significantly higher nonunion, revision surgery and osteonecrosis rate (38.5%, 38.5%, 17.3%) than in patients with IpsiFNS (6.7%, 13.3%, 0%; P = 0.004, P = 0.010, P = 0.016 respectively). There was a relationship between nonunion and femoral neck fixation with fully threaded screws (P = 0.036 and P = 0.004). Among patients who underwent an open reduction, nonunion rates were significantly higher for displaced IsoFN than for displaced IpsiFNS (7.4% vs. 43.2%, P = 0.008). Osteonecrosis rates had a relationship with reduction quality (P = 0.044).

Conclusions: Patients with a displaced isolated femoral neck fractures are at higher risk for nonunion, osteonecrosis, and revision surgery than those with a displaced femoral neck fracture associated with an IpsiFNS. Quality of reduction had a relationship with osteonecrosis rates. An open approach to the neck reduction was associated with nonunion at a higher rate in displaced IsoFN than in displaced IpsiFNS. A fixation construct of multiple cancellous independent screws that included fully threaded screws had higher odds for nonunion.

孤立性股骨颈骨折与同侧股骨颈和股骨骨干骨折的股骨颈并发症比较。
目的:关于孤立性股骨颈骨折(IsoFN)患者与股骨颈伴同侧股骨干骨折(IpsiFNS)患者在骨坏死、骨不连和翻修手术率方面的差异的数据有限。我们假设移位的IsoFN骨折比移位的IpsiFNS骨折有更高的股骨颈不愈合、骨坏死和髋关节翻修手术的发生率。进行比较以确定这些结果与其他变量之间的关系。方法:回顾性分析两家一级创伤学术机构2005年至2020年18至55岁的患者,共确定107例患者(IpsiFNS 51, IsoFN 56)。本综述分析了移位、骨坏死、骨不连和翻修手术的发生率。进一步比较确定复位质量、固定方法和复位类型对这些结果的影响。结果:移位IsoFN患者骨不愈合、翻修手术和骨坏死发生率(38.5%、38.5%、17.3%)明显高于移位IsoFN患者(6.7%、13.3%、0%;P = 0.004、P = 0.010、P = 0.016)。股骨颈骨不连与全螺纹螺钉固定有关系(P = 0.036和P = 0.004)。在接受切开复位的患者中,移位的IsoFN的骨不愈合率明显高于移位的IpsiFNS(7.4%比43.2%,P = 0.008)。骨坏死率与复位质量相关(P = 0.044)。结论:移位性孤立性股骨颈骨折患者发生骨不连、骨坏死和翻修手术的风险高于移位性股骨颈骨折伴IpsiFNS的患者。复位质量与骨坏死率相关。开放性颈部复位入路与移位IsoFN的骨不愈合相关的比例高于移位ipsifn。包括全螺纹螺钉在内的多个松质独立螺钉的固定结构具有较高的不愈合几率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
282
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信