Manganese-Based Contrast Agents as Alternatives to Gadolinium: A Comprehensive Review.

IF 2.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Linda Poggiarelli, Caterina Bernetti, Luca Pugliese, Federico Greco, Bruno Beomonte Zobel, Carlo A Mallio
{"title":"Manganese-Based Contrast Agents as Alternatives to Gadolinium: A Comprehensive Review.","authors":"Linda Poggiarelli, Caterina Bernetti, Luca Pugliese, Federico Greco, Bruno Beomonte Zobel, Carlo A Mallio","doi":"10.3390/clinpract15080137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a powerful, non-invasive diagnostic tool capable of capturing detailed anatomical and physiological information. MRI contrast agents enhance image contrast but, especially linear gadolinium-based compounds, have been associated with safety concerns. This has prompted interest in alternative contrast agents. Manganese-based contrast agents offer a promising substitute, owing to manganese's favorable magnetic properties, natural biological role, and strong T1 relaxivity. This review aims to critically assess the structure, mechanisms, applications, and challenges of manganese-based contrast agents in MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review synthesizes findings from preclinical and clinical studies involving various types of manganese-based contrast agents, including small-molecule chelates, nanoparticles, theranostic platforms, responsive agents, and controlled-release systems. Special attention is given to pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and safety evaluations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mn-based agents demonstrate promising imaging capabilities, with some achieving relaxivity values comparable to gadolinium compounds. Targeted uptake mechanisms, such as hepatocyte-specific transport via organic anion-transporting polypeptides, allow for enhanced tissue contrast. However, concerns remain regarding the in vivo release of free Mn<sup>2+</sup> ions, which could lead to toxicity. Preliminary toxicity assessments report low cytotoxicity, but further comprehensive long-term safety studies should be carried out.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Manganese-based contrast agents present a potential alternative to gadolinium-based MRI agents pending further validation. Despite promising imaging performance and biocompatibility, further investigation into stability and safety is essential. Additional research is needed to facilitate the clinical translation of these agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"15 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12384406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract15080137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a powerful, non-invasive diagnostic tool capable of capturing detailed anatomical and physiological information. MRI contrast agents enhance image contrast but, especially linear gadolinium-based compounds, have been associated with safety concerns. This has prompted interest in alternative contrast agents. Manganese-based contrast agents offer a promising substitute, owing to manganese's favorable magnetic properties, natural biological role, and strong T1 relaxivity. This review aims to critically assess the structure, mechanisms, applications, and challenges of manganese-based contrast agents in MRI.

Methods: This review synthesizes findings from preclinical and clinical studies involving various types of manganese-based contrast agents, including small-molecule chelates, nanoparticles, theranostic platforms, responsive agents, and controlled-release systems. Special attention is given to pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and safety evaluations.

Results: Mn-based agents demonstrate promising imaging capabilities, with some achieving relaxivity values comparable to gadolinium compounds. Targeted uptake mechanisms, such as hepatocyte-specific transport via organic anion-transporting polypeptides, allow for enhanced tissue contrast. However, concerns remain regarding the in vivo release of free Mn2+ ions, which could lead to toxicity. Preliminary toxicity assessments report low cytotoxicity, but further comprehensive long-term safety studies should be carried out.

Conclusions: Manganese-based contrast agents present a potential alternative to gadolinium-based MRI agents pending further validation. Despite promising imaging performance and biocompatibility, further investigation into stability and safety is essential. Additional research is needed to facilitate the clinical translation of these agents.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

锰基造影剂作为钆的替代品:综述。
背景/目的:磁共振成像(MRI)是一种功能强大的非侵入性诊断工具,能够捕获详细的解剖和生理信息。MRI造影剂增强图像对比度,但特别是线性钆基化合物,与安全问题有关。这引起了人们对替代造影剂的兴趣。锰基造影剂是一种很有前途的替代品,因为锰具有良好的磁性、天然的生物学作用和强的T1弛豫。这篇综述旨在批判性地评估锰基对比剂在MRI中的结构、机制、应用和挑战。方法:本综述综合了临床前和临床研究结果,涉及各种类型的锰基对比剂,包括小分子螯合剂、纳米颗粒、治疗平台、反应剂和控释系统。特别关注药代动力学、生物分布和安全性评价。结果:锰基试剂显示出有希望的成像能力,其中一些达到了与钆化合物相当的弛豫值。靶向摄取机制,如肝细胞特异性转运通过有机阴离子转运多肽,允许增强组织对比。然而,人们仍然担心游离Mn2+离子在体内的释放,这可能导致毒性。初步毒性评估报告为低细胞毒性,但应进行进一步全面的长期安全性研究。结论:锰基造影剂是钆基MRI造影剂的潜在替代品,有待进一步验证。尽管具有良好的成像性能和生物相容性,但对稳定性和安全性的进一步研究至关重要。需要进一步的研究来促进这些药物的临床转化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinics and Practice
Clinics and Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信