Sergio Roberto de Lucca, João Silvestre Silva Junior, Márcia Bandini
{"title":"Critical analysis of psychosocial factors at work within the Risk Management Program of Regulatory Standard-1.","authors":"Sergio Roberto de Lucca, João Silvestre Silva Junior, Márcia Bandini","doi":"10.47626/1679-4435-2025-1425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the contemporary labor landscape, globalization, technological advancements, and the destabilization of working relationships have led to significant transformations, characterized by contract flexibilization, increased work intensity, and heightened psychological demands on workers. These changes have contributed to greater job insecurity and an increased prevalence of work-related illnesses, particularly mental health disorders and musculoskeletal conditions, which are among the leading causes of occupational absenteeism. The World Health Organization recognizes psychosocial factors at work as key determinants of occupational stress and occupational health outcomes. Inadequate management of these factors is associated with presenteeism, absenteeism, and adverse mental and physical health effects. In Brazil, although progress has been made, such as the incorporation of psychosocial factors into Labor Regulatory Standard-1, the issue remains insufficiently addressed. Assessments that rely exclusively on quantitative methodologies often fail to capture the subjective dimensions of workers' experiences. This opinion article proposes a mixed-methods approach, integrating surveys and qualitative interviews, to comprehensively assess psychosocial factors in the workplace. A holistic evaluation, incorporating both objective and subjective aspects, is essential for an accurate understanding of these factors. Furthermore, the findings should inform the development of management strategies aimed at mitigating or eliminating workplace stressors that contribute to work-related illnesses. The adoption of inclusive policies, epidemiological monitoring, and participatory management frameworks can promote mental health improvements and the creation of safer and healthier work environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":38694,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho","volume":"23 1","pages":"e20251425"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12377836/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47626/1679-4435-2025-1425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the contemporary labor landscape, globalization, technological advancements, and the destabilization of working relationships have led to significant transformations, characterized by contract flexibilization, increased work intensity, and heightened psychological demands on workers. These changes have contributed to greater job insecurity and an increased prevalence of work-related illnesses, particularly mental health disorders and musculoskeletal conditions, which are among the leading causes of occupational absenteeism. The World Health Organization recognizes psychosocial factors at work as key determinants of occupational stress and occupational health outcomes. Inadequate management of these factors is associated with presenteeism, absenteeism, and adverse mental and physical health effects. In Brazil, although progress has been made, such as the incorporation of psychosocial factors into Labor Regulatory Standard-1, the issue remains insufficiently addressed. Assessments that rely exclusively on quantitative methodologies often fail to capture the subjective dimensions of workers' experiences. This opinion article proposes a mixed-methods approach, integrating surveys and qualitative interviews, to comprehensively assess psychosocial factors in the workplace. A holistic evaluation, incorporating both objective and subjective aspects, is essential for an accurate understanding of these factors. Furthermore, the findings should inform the development of management strategies aimed at mitigating or eliminating workplace stressors that contribute to work-related illnesses. The adoption of inclusive policies, epidemiological monitoring, and participatory management frameworks can promote mental health improvements and the creation of safer and healthier work environments.