Radiographical Assessment of Injectable Calcium Phosphate Bone Cement (Osteopaste) in Critical Size Bone Defects of Rabbit's Tibia Model.

IF 0.6 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Cnz Che-Seman, Z Zakaria, Z Buyong, A R Md-Ralib, M A Sharifudin, N H Mohd-Jan
{"title":"Radiographical Assessment of Injectable Calcium Phosphate Bone Cement (Osteopaste) in Critical Size Bone Defects of Rabbit's Tibia Model.","authors":"Cnz Che-Seman, Z Zakaria, Z Buyong, A R Md-Ralib, M A Sharifudin, N H Mohd-Jan","doi":"10.5704/MOJ.2507.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recent advances in orthopaedic research focus on improving bone healing and grafting. Osteopaste, a synthetic bone cement made from tetra-calcium phosphate (TTCP) and tri-calcium phosphate (TCP) has been developed to overcome limitations of traditional bone grafts. This study evaluates the radiographic density and new bone formation to bridge the critical size defect of Osteopaste compared to two other synthetic grafts, JectOS (calcium phosphate) and MIIG-X3 (calcium sulfate) at 6, 12, and 24 weeks.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A critical size defect measuring approximately 4.5mm (width) x 9.0mm (length) was surgically created at the proximal tibial metaphysis and implanted with Osteopaste, JectOS, or MIIG-X3. Following cement implantation, surrounding soft tissues were repositioned and sutured with bioabsorbable surgical suture. Bone defect healing and cement density were qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated using plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans at 6, 12, and 24 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Osteopaste group showed radiographic density levels between those of JectOS and MIIG-X3. JectOS had the highest density, while Osteopaste was higher than MIIG-X3. In the Osteopaste group, new bone formation bridged the critical size defect by 12 weeks, but no bridging occurred in the other two groups at any time point. Statistical analysis showed significant differences in mean density among the groups at 6, 12, and 24 weeks (P<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Osteopaste effectively promotes new bone formation. Its performance falls between that of JectOS, which has the highest density, and MIIG-X3. These results suggest that Osteopaste could be a useful alternative for bone grafting.</p>","PeriodicalId":45241,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal","volume":"19 2","pages":"31-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12368458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.2507.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Recent advances in orthopaedic research focus on improving bone healing and grafting. Osteopaste, a synthetic bone cement made from tetra-calcium phosphate (TTCP) and tri-calcium phosphate (TCP) has been developed to overcome limitations of traditional bone grafts. This study evaluates the radiographic density and new bone formation to bridge the critical size defect of Osteopaste compared to two other synthetic grafts, JectOS (calcium phosphate) and MIIG-X3 (calcium sulfate) at 6, 12, and 24 weeks.

Materials and methods: A critical size defect measuring approximately 4.5mm (width) x 9.0mm (length) was surgically created at the proximal tibial metaphysis and implanted with Osteopaste, JectOS, or MIIG-X3. Following cement implantation, surrounding soft tissues were repositioned and sutured with bioabsorbable surgical suture. Bone defect healing and cement density were qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated using plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans at 6, 12, and 24 weeks.

Results: The Osteopaste group showed radiographic density levels between those of JectOS and MIIG-X3. JectOS had the highest density, while Osteopaste was higher than MIIG-X3. In the Osteopaste group, new bone formation bridged the critical size defect by 12 weeks, but no bridging occurred in the other two groups at any time point. Statistical analysis showed significant differences in mean density among the groups at 6, 12, and 24 weeks (P<0.0001).

Conclusion: Osteopaste effectively promotes new bone formation. Its performance falls between that of JectOS, which has the highest density, and MIIG-X3. These results suggest that Osteopaste could be a useful alternative for bone grafting.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

可注射磷酸钙骨水泥(骨糊)治疗兔胫骨模型临界骨缺损的影像学评价。
导读:骨科研究的最新进展集中在改善骨愈合和移植。骨糊是一种由四磷酸钙(TTCP)和三磷酸钙(TCP)合成的骨水泥,克服了传统骨移植的局限性。本研究在6周、12周和24周时,与其他两种合成移植物JectOS(磷酸钙)和MIIG-X3(硫酸钙)相比,评估骨贴的x线片密度和新骨形成以桥接临界尺寸缺陷。材料和方法:在胫骨近端干骺端手术制造约4.5mm(宽)x 9.0mm(长)的临界尺寸缺陷,并植入骨贴、JectOS或MIIG-X3。骨水泥植入后,复位周围软组织并用生物可吸收的外科缝线缝合。在6周、12周和24周通过x线平片和计算机断层扫描(CT)对骨缺损愈合和骨水泥密度进行定性和定量评估。结果:骨贴组的x线密度水平介于JectOS和MIIG-X3之间。JectOS密度最高,Osteopaste密度高于MIIG-X3。在Osteopaste组,新骨形成在12周时桥接临界尺寸缺陷,而其他两组在任何时间点均未发生桥接。统计分析显示,6周、12周和24周各组的平均密度差异有统计学意义(p结论:骨贴能有效促进新骨形成。其性能介于密度最高的JectOS和MIIG-X3之间。这些结果表明,骨糊可能是一种有用的替代骨移植。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original papers and case reports three times a year in both printed and electronic version. The purpose of MOJ is to disseminate new knowledge and provide updates in Orthopaedics, trauma and musculoskeletal research. It is an Open Access journal that does not require processing fee or article processing charge from the authors. The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is the official journal of Malaysian Orthopaedic Association (MOA) and ASEAN Orthopaedic Association (AOA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信