Tricuspid regurgitation velocity reflects pulmonary artery mean pressure better than systolic pressure in cardiogenic shock.

IF 1.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Hazem Lashin, Olusegun Olusanya, Andrew Smith, Sanjeev Bhattacharyya
{"title":"Tricuspid regurgitation velocity reflects pulmonary artery mean pressure better than systolic pressure in cardiogenic shock.","authors":"Hazem Lashin, Olusegun Olusanya, Andrew Smith, Sanjeev Bhattacharyya","doi":"10.1177/17511437251367213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this exploratory analysis of 35 patients with ischemic cardiogenic shock, we evaluated the correlation between tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) and pulmonary artery catheter-derived pressures. TRV correlated best with pulmonary artery mean pressure (<i>r</i> = 0.54, <i>p</i> = 0.0009), more than with systolic or diastolic pressures. A TRV threshold of 2.3 m/s identified mean pressure >25 mmHg with 81% sensitivity and 62% specificity. These findings suggest that TRV may serve as a non-invasive indicator of elevated pulmonary pressure in critically ill patients when invasive monitoring is unavailable. Further validation in larger, diverse cohorts is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"17511437251367213"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12394234/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437251367213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this exploratory analysis of 35 patients with ischemic cardiogenic shock, we evaluated the correlation between tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) and pulmonary artery catheter-derived pressures. TRV correlated best with pulmonary artery mean pressure (r = 0.54, p = 0.0009), more than with systolic or diastolic pressures. A TRV threshold of 2.3 m/s identified mean pressure >25 mmHg with 81% sensitivity and 62% specificity. These findings suggest that TRV may serve as a non-invasive indicator of elevated pulmonary pressure in critically ill patients when invasive monitoring is unavailable. Further validation in larger, diverse cohorts is needed.

心源性休克时三尖瓣反流速度比收缩压更能反映肺动脉平均压。
在对35例缺血性心源性休克患者的探索性分析中,我们评估了三尖瓣反流速度(TRV)与肺动脉导管源性压力的相关性。TRV与肺动脉平均压相关性最好(r = 0.54, p = 0.0009),高于与收缩压和舒张压相关性。TRV阈值为2.3 m/s,以81%的灵敏度和62%的特异性识别平均压力bbb25 mmHg。这些发现表明,在无法进行有创监测的危重患者中,TRV可作为肺动脉高压升高的非创性指标。需要在更大的、不同的队列中进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Nursing-Critical Care Nursing
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Intensive Care Society (JICS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that strives to disseminate clinically and scientifically relevant peer-reviewed research, evaluation, experience and opinion to all staff working in the field of intensive care medicine. Our aim is to inform clinicians on the provision of best practice and provide direction for innovative scientific research in what is one of the broadest and most multi-disciplinary healthcare specialties. While original articles and systematic reviews lie at the heart of the Journal, we also value and recognise the need for opinion articles, case reports and correspondence to guide clinically and scientifically important areas in which conclusive evidence is lacking. The style of the Journal is based on its founding mission statement to ‘instruct, inform and entertain by encompassing the best aspects of both tabloid and broadsheet''.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信