A fight worth remembering: sharing archival materials in interviews to support recall of ex-mental patient activism.

IF 2.2 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Frontiers in Sociology Pub Date : 2025-08-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2025.1603891
Danielle Landry
{"title":"A fight worth remembering: sharing archival materials in interviews to support recall of ex-mental patient activism.","authors":"Danielle Landry","doi":"10.3389/fsoc.2025.1603891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This institutional ethnographic (IE) study of a little-known Ontario-based mad history recounts how, in the 1980s and 1990s, ex-mental patients established a number of social enterprises (also known as consumer/survivor businesses), secured government funding and through these sites, got politically active around issues that impacted their lives. This research poses critical sociological questions about the circulation of activist knowledge-practices and the formation of these businesses as sites of community organizing. Methodologically, IE offers an approach through which I began from the experiences of ex-mental patients while aiming to explore how their activist practices are coordinated trans-locally. By interviewing 42 people who were involved in or supported consumer/survivor businesses and by assembling and digitizing materials from their personal collections, archival collections and the businesses themselves, this work brings into view the central role that consumer/survivor business played in mad people's activism locally. Formulated at the intersection of mad studies, social movement studies, feminist theories and sociology of knowledge, this study drew on IE interviews using archival data in innovative ways. Pointing to concrete examples, I put forward numerous benefits to using archival materials in interviews to aid participants in recalling events from the not-so-recent past. Arguably, engaging archival materials during interviews can enhance accessibility for populations who are older, experience memory issues, have a history of psychiatric interventions, or for anyone who may benefit from material prompts to resituate them to a particular time and space. Looking through materials alongside participants may serve to initiate discussion and prompt recall, evoking participants' memories of past events and the meaning they attribute to these, in turn producing richer stories. Doing so may help to ensure key informants are able to make meaningful contributions to sociological research on histories of activism. Talking to participants about archival material can help researchers to make sense of those materials, their connections and sequencing. Additionally, audio and visual materials may bring the contributions of community members who are no longer with us back into dialogue with those who are.</p>","PeriodicalId":36297,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sociology","volume":"10 ","pages":"1603891"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12380807/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1603891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This institutional ethnographic (IE) study of a little-known Ontario-based mad history recounts how, in the 1980s and 1990s, ex-mental patients established a number of social enterprises (also known as consumer/survivor businesses), secured government funding and through these sites, got politically active around issues that impacted their lives. This research poses critical sociological questions about the circulation of activist knowledge-practices and the formation of these businesses as sites of community organizing. Methodologically, IE offers an approach through which I began from the experiences of ex-mental patients while aiming to explore how their activist practices are coordinated trans-locally. By interviewing 42 people who were involved in or supported consumer/survivor businesses and by assembling and digitizing materials from their personal collections, archival collections and the businesses themselves, this work brings into view the central role that consumer/survivor business played in mad people's activism locally. Formulated at the intersection of mad studies, social movement studies, feminist theories and sociology of knowledge, this study drew on IE interviews using archival data in innovative ways. Pointing to concrete examples, I put forward numerous benefits to using archival materials in interviews to aid participants in recalling events from the not-so-recent past. Arguably, engaging archival materials during interviews can enhance accessibility for populations who are older, experience memory issues, have a history of psychiatric interventions, or for anyone who may benefit from material prompts to resituate them to a particular time and space. Looking through materials alongside participants may serve to initiate discussion and prompt recall, evoking participants' memories of past events and the meaning they attribute to these, in turn producing richer stories. Doing so may help to ensure key informants are able to make meaningful contributions to sociological research on histories of activism. Talking to participants about archival material can help researchers to make sense of those materials, their connections and sequencing. Additionally, audio and visual materials may bring the contributions of community members who are no longer with us back into dialogue with those who are.

Abstract Image

一场值得铭记的斗争:在采访中分享档案材料,以支持对精神康复患者激进主义的回忆。
这个机构人种学(IE)研究了一个鲜为人知的安大略省疯狂历史,讲述了在20世纪80年代和90年代,精神康复患者如何建立了一些社会企业(也称为消费者/幸存者企业),获得政府资助,并通过这些网站,在影响他们生活的问题上积极参与政治活动。这项研究提出了关于激进知识实践的流通和这些企业作为社区组织场所的形成的关键社会学问题。在方法上,IE提供了一种方法,通过这种方法,我从精神康复患者的经验开始,同时旨在探索他们的激进实践是如何跨地方协调的。通过采访42位参与或支持消费者/幸存者企业的人,并从他们的个人收藏、档案收藏和企业本身中收集和数字化材料,这项工作使人们认识到消费者/幸存者企业在当地疯狂的人的行动主义中发挥的核心作用。本研究是在疯狂研究、社会运动研究、女权主义理论和知识社会学的交叉点上制定的,以创新的方式利用档案数据利用IE访谈。通过具体的例子,我提出了在采访中使用档案材料来帮助参与者回忆不久前发生的事情的许多好处。可以说,在采访中使用档案材料可以提高老年人,经历记忆问题的人,有精神干预史的人,或者任何可能从材料提示中受益的人,使他们重新回到特定的时间和空间。与参与者一起浏览材料可能有助于发起讨论和促进回忆,唤起参与者对过去事件的记忆以及他们赋予这些事件的意义,从而产生更丰富的故事。这样做可能有助于确保关键信息提供者能够对行动主义历史的社会学研究做出有意义的贡献。与参与者谈论档案材料可以帮助研究人员理解这些材料,它们的联系和顺序。此外,音频和视频材料可以使不再与我们在一起的社区成员的贡献重新与那些还在的人进行对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Sociology
Frontiers in Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信