Distribution and quality of privately-funded general practices in England: a cross-sectional analysis.

IF 2 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-08-27 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0116
Joseph Hutchinson, Michael Anderson, Harriet Bullen, Zara Kurdo, Matt Sutton
{"title":"Distribution and quality of privately-funded general practices in England: a cross-sectional analysis.","authors":"Joseph Hutchinson, Michael Anderson, Harriet Bullen, Zara Kurdo, Matt Sutton","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Public surveys indicate demand for privately-funded general practice services in England has increased. However, little is known regarding the number, location and quality of private general practices.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine: 1) the geographical distribution of private general practices across England; 2) the relationships between access, continuity of care and funding of NHS general practices with nearby private practices; and 3) the quality ratings of NHS and private general practices.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis of NHS and private general practices in England as of April 2024.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used the Care Quality Commission (CQC) Primary Medical Services Inspectorate to identify all private general practices in England. We used multilevel logistic regression to examine associations between NHS practice characteristics and the presence of a private general practice nearby. We then compared available CQC ratings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As of April 2024, England had 358 private and 5,976 NHS practices. Private general practices are primarily in London and other urban areas. NHS practices with higher patient satisfaction with waits for appointments (odds ratio 1.08 (95% CI: 1.03-1.13)) and more GPs per 10,000 patients (1.04 (1.01-1.06)) were more likely to have a private practice nearby. There was no association with continuity of care or funding. Quality ratings were similar, although 44% of private practices were unrated by the CQC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Private general practices are more common in London, as well as areas with better access to NHS GPs. The growth in private general practices may have widened inequalities in access to primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Public surveys indicate demand for privately-funded general practice services in England has increased. However, little is known regarding the number, location and quality of private general practices.

Aim: To examine: 1) the geographical distribution of private general practices across England; 2) the relationships between access, continuity of care and funding of NHS general practices with nearby private practices; and 3) the quality ratings of NHS and private general practices.

Design & setting: Cross-sectional analysis of NHS and private general practices in England as of April 2024.

Method: We used the Care Quality Commission (CQC) Primary Medical Services Inspectorate to identify all private general practices in England. We used multilevel logistic regression to examine associations between NHS practice characteristics and the presence of a private general practice nearby. We then compared available CQC ratings.

Results: As of April 2024, England had 358 private and 5,976 NHS practices. Private general practices are primarily in London and other urban areas. NHS practices with higher patient satisfaction with waits for appointments (odds ratio 1.08 (95% CI: 1.03-1.13)) and more GPs per 10,000 patients (1.04 (1.01-1.06)) were more likely to have a private practice nearby. There was no association with continuity of care or funding. Quality ratings were similar, although 44% of private practices were unrated by the CQC.

Conclusion: Private general practices are more common in London, as well as areas with better access to NHS GPs. The growth in private general practices may have widened inequalities in access to primary care.

英格兰私人资助的全科医疗的分布和质量:横断面分析。
背景:公众调查表明,英国对私人资助的全科医疗服务的需求有所增加。然而,人们对私人全科诊所的数量、地点和质量知之甚少。目的:研究:1)英格兰私人全科诊所的地理分布;2)获取、护理的连续性和NHS全科诊所与附近私人诊所之间的关系;3) NHS和私人全科医生的质量评级。设计和设置:截至2024年4月,英国NHS和私人全科医生的横断面分析。方法:我们使用护理质量委员会(CQC)初级医疗服务检查员来确定英格兰所有的私人全科诊所。我们使用多水平逻辑回归来检验NHS实践特征与附近私人全科诊所的存在之间的关联。然后,我们比较了现有的CQC评级。结果:截至2024年4月,英格兰有358家私人诊所和5976家NHS诊所。私人全科诊所主要在伦敦和其他城市地区。患者对预约等待满意度较高的NHS诊所(优势比1.08 (95% CI: 1.03-1.13))和每10,000名患者中有更多全科医生(1.04(1.01-1.06))更有可能在附近有私人诊所。与护理或资金的连续性没有关联。尽管44%的私人诊所没有经过CQC的评级,但质量评级是相似的。结论:私人全科诊所在伦敦更常见,以及更好地获得NHS全科医生的地区。私人全科诊所的增长可能扩大了获得初级保健的不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信