Fast and accurate quantification of double-strand breaks in microsatellites by digital PCR.

IF 1.3 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Biology Methods and Protocols Pub Date : 2025-08-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/biomethods/bpaf059
Cécile Palao, Adèle Kovacs, Maria Teresa Teixeira, Guy-Franck Richard
{"title":"Fast and accurate quantification of double-strand breaks in microsatellites by digital PCR.","authors":"Cécile Palao, Adèle Kovacs, Maria Teresa Teixeira, Guy-Franck Richard","doi":"10.1093/biomethods/bpaf059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) represent critical events in genome integrity, arising from both endogenous cellular processes and exogenous factors. These breaks are implicated in various genomic aberrations and chromosomal rearrangements, leading to cancers and genetic disorders. Common and rare fragile sites, containing repetitive elements and non-B DNA structures, are particularly prone to breakage under replication stress, which play a pivotal role in cancer development and genetic diseases. Accurate quantification of DNA breaks in the context of repetitive sequences such as microsatellites or non-B DNA structures is technically challenging. We have been comparing four different methods to reliably quantify DSBs in repetitive DNA, namely Southern blot, DSB-PCR, real-time DSB-qPCR, and digital PCR (dPCR). We show here that dPCR offers enhanced sensitivity and specificity compared to other methods. This provides significant applications for future disease diagnosis, understanding molecular mechanisms generating chromosomal breakage and for the development of gene therapies for microsatellite expansion disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":36528,"journal":{"name":"Biology Methods and Protocols","volume":"10 1","pages":"bpaf059"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12377901/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology Methods and Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomethods/bpaf059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) represent critical events in genome integrity, arising from both endogenous cellular processes and exogenous factors. These breaks are implicated in various genomic aberrations and chromosomal rearrangements, leading to cancers and genetic disorders. Common and rare fragile sites, containing repetitive elements and non-B DNA structures, are particularly prone to breakage under replication stress, which play a pivotal role in cancer development and genetic diseases. Accurate quantification of DNA breaks in the context of repetitive sequences such as microsatellites or non-B DNA structures is technically challenging. We have been comparing four different methods to reliably quantify DSBs in repetitive DNA, namely Southern blot, DSB-PCR, real-time DSB-qPCR, and digital PCR (dPCR). We show here that dPCR offers enhanced sensitivity and specificity compared to other methods. This provides significant applications for future disease diagnosis, understanding molecular mechanisms generating chromosomal breakage and for the development of gene therapies for microsatellite expansion disorders.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

用数字PCR快速准确地定量微卫星双链断裂。
DNA双链断裂(DSBs)是基因组完整性的关键事件,由内源性细胞过程和外源性因素引起。这些断裂与各种基因组畸变和染色体重排有关,导致癌症和遗传疾病。含有重复元件和非b DNA结构的常见和罕见脆性位点在复制胁迫下特别容易断裂,在癌症的发生和遗传疾病中起着关键作用。在重复序列(如微卫星或非b DNA结构)的背景下,准确定量DNA断裂在技术上具有挑战性。我们已经比较了四种不同的方法来可靠地定量重复DNA中的dsb,即Southern blot, DSB-PCR,实时DSB-qPCR和数字PCR (dPCR)。我们在这里表明,与其他方法相比,dPCR提供了更高的灵敏度和特异性。这为未来的疾病诊断、理解产生染色体断裂的分子机制以及开发微卫星扩展疾病的基因治疗提供了重要的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biology Methods and Protocols
Biology Methods and Protocols Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
28
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信