Implementing a Digital Physical Activity Intervention for Older Adults: Qualitative Study.

IF 4.8 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
JMIR Aging Pub Date : 2025-08-21 DOI:10.2196/64953
Cherish Boxall, Laura Dennison, Sascha Miller, Judith Joseph, Kate Morton, Jenny Corser, Joanna Kesten, Asgar Electicwala, Max J Western, Stephen Lim, Chloe Grimmett, Lucy Yardley, Katherine Bradbury
{"title":"Implementing a Digital Physical Activity Intervention for Older Adults: Qualitative Study.","authors":"Cherish Boxall, Laura Dennison, Sascha Miller, Judith Joseph, Kate Morton, Jenny Corser, Joanna Kesten, Asgar Electicwala, Max J Western, Stephen Lim, Chloe Grimmett, Lucy Yardley, Katherine Bradbury","doi":"10.2196/64953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical activity (PA) in older adults can prevent, treat, or offset symptoms and deterioration from various health conditions and help maintain independence. However, most older adults are insufficiently active. Digital interventions have the potential for high reach at low cost.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper reports on the implementation of \"Active Lives,\" a digital intervention developed specifically for older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study had a qualitative design. The implementation team approached a range of National Health Service, public health, community, and third-sector organizations in the United Kingdom to offer Active Lives to as large and diverse groups of older adults as possible. Alongside real-world implementation activities, research was conducted to explore what supports and inhibits the implementation of a digital intervention for PA in older adults. Data collection involved interviews with implementation partners (n=15) and the implementation team (n=3) plus extensive field notes from stakeholder communications. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five broad themes were developed, capturing implementation barriers and facilitators. These were (1) complex and opaque networks and influencers, (2) forming an understanding of Active Lives and its fit, (3) a landscape of competition and conflicting interests, (4) navigating unclear approval processes, and (5) shifting strategies: small and effortful to high reach and passive. Identifying key decision makers proved arduous, consuming significant time and resources, and proposals from enthusiastic implementation partners often proved impractical or overly burdensome. Health care professionals demonstrated a comprehensive understanding of the potential benefits of digital interventions in alleviating operational burdens and improving patient care. However, stakeholders from disparate sectors held reservations about digital intervention and had different views on the best approaches to supporting PA among older adults. This discord was exacerbated by conflicts with existing local initiatives, such as group exercise programs, which occasionally hindered the implementation of Active Lives. Furthermore, bureaucratic hurdles within National Health Service trust approval processes acted as formidable obstacles, dampening progress and resolve, highlighting the need for guidance in identifying sustainable and scalable practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings highlight important implementation challenges to digital PA interventions for older adults such as bureaucratic barriers and alignment with ongoing initiatives. This research emphasizes the necessity for strategic direction and multilevel guidance to efficiently implement digital interventions for PA among community-dwelling older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"8 ","pages":"e64953"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12370260/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/64953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physical activity (PA) in older adults can prevent, treat, or offset symptoms and deterioration from various health conditions and help maintain independence. However, most older adults are insufficiently active. Digital interventions have the potential for high reach at low cost.

Objective: This paper reports on the implementation of "Active Lives," a digital intervention developed specifically for older adults.

Methods: This study had a qualitative design. The implementation team approached a range of National Health Service, public health, community, and third-sector organizations in the United Kingdom to offer Active Lives to as large and diverse groups of older adults as possible. Alongside real-world implementation activities, research was conducted to explore what supports and inhibits the implementation of a digital intervention for PA in older adults. Data collection involved interviews with implementation partners (n=15) and the implementation team (n=3) plus extensive field notes from stakeholder communications. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyze the data.

Results: Five broad themes were developed, capturing implementation barriers and facilitators. These were (1) complex and opaque networks and influencers, (2) forming an understanding of Active Lives and its fit, (3) a landscape of competition and conflicting interests, (4) navigating unclear approval processes, and (5) shifting strategies: small and effortful to high reach and passive. Identifying key decision makers proved arduous, consuming significant time and resources, and proposals from enthusiastic implementation partners often proved impractical or overly burdensome. Health care professionals demonstrated a comprehensive understanding of the potential benefits of digital interventions in alleviating operational burdens and improving patient care. However, stakeholders from disparate sectors held reservations about digital intervention and had different views on the best approaches to supporting PA among older adults. This discord was exacerbated by conflicts with existing local initiatives, such as group exercise programs, which occasionally hindered the implementation of Active Lives. Furthermore, bureaucratic hurdles within National Health Service trust approval processes acted as formidable obstacles, dampening progress and resolve, highlighting the need for guidance in identifying sustainable and scalable practices.

Conclusions: The findings highlight important implementation challenges to digital PA interventions for older adults such as bureaucratic barriers and alignment with ongoing initiatives. This research emphasizes the necessity for strategic direction and multilevel guidance to efficiently implement digital interventions for PA among community-dwelling older adults.

实施老年人数字体育活动干预:定性研究。
背景:老年人的身体活动(PA)可以预防、治疗或抵消各种健康状况引起的症状和恶化,并有助于保持独立性。然而,大多数老年人活动不足。数字干预具有以低成本实现高覆盖的潜力。目的:本文报告了“积极生活”的实施情况,这是一种专门为老年人开发的数字干预措施。方法:采用定性设计。实施小组接触了联合王国的一系列国家卫生服务、公共卫生、社区和第三部门组织,向尽可能多和多样化的老年人群体提供积极生活。除了现实世界的实施活动外,研究还探讨了支持和抑制老年人PA数字干预实施的因素。数据收集包括与实施伙伴(n=15)和实施团队(n=3)的访谈,以及来自利益相关者沟通的大量现场记录。采用归纳主题分析法对数据进行分析。结果:开发了五大主题,捕捉实施障碍和促进因素。这些是(1)复杂而不透明的网络和影响者,(2)形成对积极生活及其适合性的理解,(3)竞争和利益冲突的景观,(4)导航不明确的审批流程,以及(5)转变策略:从小而努力到高影响和被动。确定关键的决策者被证明是艰巨的,耗费了大量的时间和资源,而来自热心的实施伙伴的建议往往被证明是不切实际的或过于繁重的。医疗保健专业人员展示了对数字干预在减轻业务负担和改善患者护理方面的潜在益处的全面理解。然而,来自不同行业的利益相关者对数字干预持保留态度,并对支持老年人PA的最佳方法持不同看法。与现有的地方倡议(如团体锻炼项目)的冲突加剧了这种不和谐,这种冲突有时会阻碍“积极生活”的实施。此外,国民保健服务信托批准程序中的官僚主义障碍是巨大的障碍,阻碍了进展和决心,突出表明需要在确定可持续和可扩展做法方面提供指导。结论:研究结果强调了老年人数字化PA干预措施的重要实施挑战,如官僚主义障碍和与正在进行的举措的一致性。本研究强调了为有效实施社区居住老年人PA数字化干预的战略方向和多层次指导的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Aging
JMIR Aging Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信