Medical mesocosms and cohort differences in victim decisions in spousal violence in Sub-Saharan Africa.

IF 2.2 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Frontiers in Sociology Pub Date : 2025-08-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2025.1266401
Patricia Elung'ata
{"title":"Medical mesocosms and cohort differences in victim decisions in spousal violence in Sub-Saharan Africa.","authors":"Patricia Elung'ata","doi":"10.3389/fsoc.2025.1266401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contradictory evidence exists on whether medicine explicates social disparities in health perceptions. This study evaluates healthcare systems as mesocosms to understand social differences in spousal violence perceptions in sub-Saharan Africa, concretely, cohort differences in victim decisions in spousal violence (VDSV).</p><p><strong>Conceptual framework: </strong>Medical dominance theory criticizes medical power asymmetry, while socio-ecological theory illuminates social disparities in human behavior. This study investigates socio-behavioral patterns in medicine as parallels to spousal violence behaviors, analyzing how power asymmetry influences VDSV in sub-Saharan Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study analyzed data from the latest Demographic and Health Surveys (2001-2024) across 31 countries, focusing on 193,232 women aged 15-49 years and their VDSV patterns: none, Discordant, and Other types. Unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) examined associations between VDSV patterns and birth cohorts (BCs) while adjusting for confounders. Interaction terms assessed the impact of neighborhood ethnic diversity, relationship power differences, and healthcare access. A two-level hierarchical multinomial logistic regression model analyzed VDSV variation, considering individual, cluster, and household-level confounders with random country effects. Spatial interpolation addressed geographical clustering. Analyses were performed using the McLogit package in R (Version 4.4.0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across BCs, a greater percentage change in predicted marginal probabilities was observed for Other type VDSV compared to Discordant VDSV. Overall, women with recent healthcare access had smaller percentage changes; those with a large relationship power difference, especially, showed the opposite trend. Notably, observed healthcare access effects persisted beyond socioeconomic disparities.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Higher VDSV amongst younger birth cohorts suggests lower SV-accepting attitudes. VDSV differences across healthcare access intimate anti-violence intervention exposure effects; relationship power differences play moderating roles. Persistent adjusted healthcare access effects suggest roles for narrowing socio-health inequalities in SSA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study results advocate for macro-societal policies within healthcare that address social issues, particularly through theory-based approaches. Future research may evaluate the potential influence of healthcare funding cuts.</p>","PeriodicalId":36297,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sociology","volume":"10 ","pages":"1266401"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1266401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Contradictory evidence exists on whether medicine explicates social disparities in health perceptions. This study evaluates healthcare systems as mesocosms to understand social differences in spousal violence perceptions in sub-Saharan Africa, concretely, cohort differences in victim decisions in spousal violence (VDSV).

Conceptual framework: Medical dominance theory criticizes medical power asymmetry, while socio-ecological theory illuminates social disparities in human behavior. This study investigates socio-behavioral patterns in medicine as parallels to spousal violence behaviors, analyzing how power asymmetry influences VDSV in sub-Saharan Africa.

Methods: A cross-sectional study analyzed data from the latest Demographic and Health Surveys (2001-2024) across 31 countries, focusing on 193,232 women aged 15-49 years and their VDSV patterns: none, Discordant, and Other types. Unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) examined associations between VDSV patterns and birth cohorts (BCs) while adjusting for confounders. Interaction terms assessed the impact of neighborhood ethnic diversity, relationship power differences, and healthcare access. A two-level hierarchical multinomial logistic regression model analyzed VDSV variation, considering individual, cluster, and household-level confounders with random country effects. Spatial interpolation addressed geographical clustering. Analyses were performed using the McLogit package in R (Version 4.4.0).

Results: Across BCs, a greater percentage change in predicted marginal probabilities was observed for Other type VDSV compared to Discordant VDSV. Overall, women with recent healthcare access had smaller percentage changes; those with a large relationship power difference, especially, showed the opposite trend. Notably, observed healthcare access effects persisted beyond socioeconomic disparities.

Discussion: Higher VDSV amongst younger birth cohorts suggests lower SV-accepting attitudes. VDSV differences across healthcare access intimate anti-violence intervention exposure effects; relationship power differences play moderating roles. Persistent adjusted healthcare access effects suggest roles for narrowing socio-health inequalities in SSA.

Conclusion: The study results advocate for macro-societal policies within healthcare that address social issues, particularly through theory-based approaches. Future research may evaluate the potential influence of healthcare funding cuts.

Abstract Image

撒哈拉以南非洲地区配偶暴力受害者决策的医疗中观和群体差异
背景:关于医学是否能解释健康观念中的社会差异,存在着相互矛盾的证据。本研究将医疗保健系统作为中生态系统进行评估,以了解撒哈拉以南非洲地区对配偶暴力认知的社会差异,具体而言,是配偶暴力受害者决策的群体差异(VDSV)。概念框架:医学优势理论批判医疗权力不对称,社会生态理论阐释人类行为的社会差异。本研究调查了医学中的社会行为模式与配偶暴力行为的相似之处,分析了权力不对称如何影响撒哈拉以南非洲地区的VDSV。方法:一项横断面研究分析了31个国家最新的人口与健康调查(2001-2024)的数据,重点关注193,232名15-49岁的女性及其VDSV模式:无、不一致和其他类型。在调整混杂因素后,未调整的比值比(ORs)检查了VDSV模式与出生队列(bc)之间的关联。相互作用项评估邻里种族多样性、关系权力差异和医疗保健获取的影响。考虑到个体、集群和家庭水平的混杂因素和随机国家效应,一个两级分层多项逻辑回归模型分析了VDSV的变化。空间插值解决地理聚类问题。使用R中的McLogit包(版本4.4.0)进行分析。结果:在不列颠哥伦比亚省,与不协调VDSV相比,其他类型VDSV的预测边际概率变化百分比更大。总体而言,最近获得医疗保健的妇女的百分比变化较小;尤其是那些关系权力差异大的人,表现出相反的趋势。值得注意的是,观察到的医疗保健获取效应持续存在于社会经济差异之外。讨论:在较年轻的出生队列中,较高的VDSV表明较低的sv接受态度。VDSV在医疗保健获取亲密反暴力干预暴露效应中的差异;关系权力差异起调节作用。持续调整的医疗保健获取效应表明,在SSA缩小社会健康不平等的作用。结论:研究结果提倡在医疗保健中解决社会问题的宏观社会政策,特别是通过基于理论的方法。未来的研究可能会评估医疗保健资金削减的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Sociology
Frontiers in Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信