Midwives' knowledge and diagnostic practices for mastitis and breast cancer in breastfeeding women in Japan: A cross-sectional study.

IF 1.7 Q3 NURSING
European Journal of Midwifery Pub Date : 2025-08-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.18332/ejm/209494
Yuki Kanazawa
{"title":"Midwives' knowledge and diagnostic practices for mastitis and breast cancer in breastfeeding women in Japan: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Yuki Kanazawa","doi":"10.18332/ejm/209494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Japanese midwives support lactating women to continue breastfeeding. However, midwives often learn breast care methods through practical experience. This study investigated how midwives acquire knowledge about mastitis and breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted in Japan over two months. The study participants were midwives with breast care experience. The questionnaire was sent to 800 midwifery facilities for recruitment. The questions covered learning and diagnostic methods for general breast care, bacterial mastitis, severe mastitis, and breast cancer during lactation. The analysis method involved descriptive statistics. An Ethical Review Committee approved this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey return rate was 27.50% (n=200). The valid response rate was 87.27% (n=192). Although the learning method that helped midwives most regarding mastitis, in general, was breast care experience (38.0%), knowledge about bacterial mastitis and severe mastitis came from advice from doctors or senior midwives (33.3%, 42.4%). However, knowledge about breast cancer during lactation was mostly learned during formal education (29.5%); many had never learned about it (10.5%). The most common method used by midwives to make breast care decisions was subjective judgment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most midwives learned a great deal by observing and palpating actual breasts in clinical settings. Some midwives had learned very little about breast cancer. Most midwives did not use medical equipment for breast evaluations. This suggests that Japanese midwives have high breast care skills. However, there is room for improving midwives' skills in using medical equipment.</p>","PeriodicalId":32920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Midwifery","volume":"9 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12395512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/209494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Japanese midwives support lactating women to continue breastfeeding. However, midwives often learn breast care methods through practical experience. This study investigated how midwives acquire knowledge about mastitis and breast cancer.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Japan over two months. The study participants were midwives with breast care experience. The questionnaire was sent to 800 midwifery facilities for recruitment. The questions covered learning and diagnostic methods for general breast care, bacterial mastitis, severe mastitis, and breast cancer during lactation. The analysis method involved descriptive statistics. An Ethical Review Committee approved this study.

Results: The survey return rate was 27.50% (n=200). The valid response rate was 87.27% (n=192). Although the learning method that helped midwives most regarding mastitis, in general, was breast care experience (38.0%), knowledge about bacterial mastitis and severe mastitis came from advice from doctors or senior midwives (33.3%, 42.4%). However, knowledge about breast cancer during lactation was mostly learned during formal education (29.5%); many had never learned about it (10.5%). The most common method used by midwives to make breast care decisions was subjective judgment.

Conclusions: Most midwives learned a great deal by observing and palpating actual breasts in clinical settings. Some midwives had learned very little about breast cancer. Most midwives did not use medical equipment for breast evaluations. This suggests that Japanese midwives have high breast care skills. However, there is room for improving midwives' skills in using medical equipment.

Abstract Image

日本母乳喂养妇女乳腺炎和乳腺癌的助产士知识和诊断实践:一项横断面研究。
简介:日本助产士支持哺乳期妇女继续母乳喂养。然而,助产士通常通过实际经验来学习乳房护理方法。这项研究调查了助产士如何获得有关乳腺炎和乳腺癌的知识。方法:本横断面研究在日本进行了两个多月。研究参与者是有乳房护理经验的助产士。调查表已分发到800个助产设施供征聘。这些问题包括一般乳房护理、细菌性乳腺炎、严重乳腺炎和哺乳期乳腺癌的学习和诊断方法。分析方法涉及描述性统计。伦理审查委员会批准了这项研究。结果:调查回收率为27.50% (n=200)。有效有效率为87.27% (n=192)。虽然对助产士在乳腺炎方面帮助最大的学习方法通常是乳房护理经验(38.0%),但关于细菌性乳腺炎和严重乳腺炎的知识来自医生或高级助产士的建议(33.3%,42.4%)。然而,哺乳期乳腺癌知识主要是在正规教育中获得的(29.5%);许多人从未听说过(10.5%)。助产士做出乳房护理决定时最常用的方法是主观判断。结论:大多数助产士在临床环境中通过观察和触诊实际乳房学到了很多。一些助产士对乳腺癌了解甚少。大多数助产士不使用医疗设备进行乳房评估。这表明日本助产士有很高的乳房护理技能。然而,助产士使用医疗设备的技能仍有提高的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Midwifery
European Journal of Midwifery Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信