Measuring childhood mortality through mobile phone interviews in Mozambique.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tropical Medicine & International Health Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1111/tmi.70004
Almamy Malick Kante, Cremildo Manhica, Akum Aveika, Azarias Mulungo, Fred Van Dyk, Nordino Machava, Helen Kuo, Charfudin Saccor, Dustin G Gibson, Celso Monjane, Robert E Black, Ivalda Macicame, Agbessi Amouzou
{"title":"Measuring childhood mortality through mobile phone interviews in Mozambique.","authors":"Almamy Malick Kante, Cremildo Manhica, Akum Aveika, Azarias Mulungo, Fred Van Dyk, Nordino Machava, Helen Kuo, Charfudin Saccor, Dustin G Gibson, Celso Monjane, Robert E Black, Ivalda Macicame, Agbessi Amouzou","doi":"10.1111/tmi.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Childhood mortality is a key indicator of progress in health and development in low- and middle-income countries, traditionally measured through household surveys with face-to-face interviews. This study explored an alternative approach that used mobile phone interviews with women in Mozambique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using two sampling approaches, we interviewed women of reproductive age about their pregnancy history through mobile phones. The first method used an existing database of phone numbers collected from a national mortality surveillance, Countrywide Mortality Surveillance for Action (COMSA). The second employed random digit dialling (RDD) to generate phone numbers. The COMSA phone sample successfully reached 13,545 women while the RDD sample reached 10,359 women. We compared neonatal (NMR), infant (IMR) and under-five mortality rates (U5MR) to estimates from the United Nations (UN), COMSA and the 2022 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS). The mobile phone-based mortality rates were adjusted using the raking approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mobile phone interviews incorporating pregnancy history yielded recent childhood mortality rates comparable to those reported by the DHS. The 2020-2021 U5MRs were estimated at 59.3 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 41.9-76.7) in the COMSA phone sample and 44.9 (95% CI: 9.0-80.7) in the RDD sample, compared to 59.6 (95% CI: 53.7-65.6) in the DHS. These estimates were lower than the UN projections at 71.6 (95% CI: 65.5-87.1) and COMSA at 80.0 (95% CI: 69.0-91.0). We observed similar trends for NMR and IMR. Childhood mortality trends were comparable between the COMSA phone sample and the DHS sample. In contrast, the RDD sample appeared to consistently underestimate childhood mortality compared to the other samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mobile phone surveys, including standard full pregnancy history tools, produced recent childhood mortality levels and trends for national and subnational levels similar to face-to-face approaches such as the DHS.</p>","PeriodicalId":23962,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Medicine & International Health","volume":" ","pages":"1087-1096"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12501560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Medicine & International Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.70004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Childhood mortality is a key indicator of progress in health and development in low- and middle-income countries, traditionally measured through household surveys with face-to-face interviews. This study explored an alternative approach that used mobile phone interviews with women in Mozambique.

Methods: Using two sampling approaches, we interviewed women of reproductive age about their pregnancy history through mobile phones. The first method used an existing database of phone numbers collected from a national mortality surveillance, Countrywide Mortality Surveillance for Action (COMSA). The second employed random digit dialling (RDD) to generate phone numbers. The COMSA phone sample successfully reached 13,545 women while the RDD sample reached 10,359 women. We compared neonatal (NMR), infant (IMR) and under-five mortality rates (U5MR) to estimates from the United Nations (UN), COMSA and the 2022 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS). The mobile phone-based mortality rates were adjusted using the raking approach.

Results: The mobile phone interviews incorporating pregnancy history yielded recent childhood mortality rates comparable to those reported by the DHS. The 2020-2021 U5MRs were estimated at 59.3 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 41.9-76.7) in the COMSA phone sample and 44.9 (95% CI: 9.0-80.7) in the RDD sample, compared to 59.6 (95% CI: 53.7-65.6) in the DHS. These estimates were lower than the UN projections at 71.6 (95% CI: 65.5-87.1) and COMSA at 80.0 (95% CI: 69.0-91.0). We observed similar trends for NMR and IMR. Childhood mortality trends were comparable between the COMSA phone sample and the DHS sample. In contrast, the RDD sample appeared to consistently underestimate childhood mortality compared to the other samples.

Conclusion: Mobile phone surveys, including standard full pregnancy history tools, produced recent childhood mortality levels and trends for national and subnational levels similar to face-to-face approaches such as the DHS.

Abstract Image

在莫桑比克通过移动电话访谈测量儿童死亡率。
目标:儿童死亡率是低收入和中等收入国家在健康和发展方面取得进展的一项关键指标,传统上是通过面对面访谈的家庭调查来衡量的。本研究探索了另一种方法,即对莫桑比克妇女进行移动电话访谈。方法:采用两种抽样方法,通过手机对育龄妇女进行妊娠史调查。第一种方法使用了从全国死亡率监测行动(COMSA)中收集的现有电话号码数据库。第二个使用随机数字拨号(RDD)来生成电话号码。COMSA的电话样本成功地覆盖了13545名女性,而RDD的样本覆盖了10359名女性。我们将新生儿(NMR)、婴儿(IMR)和五岁以下儿童死亡率(U5MR)与联合国(UN)、COMSA和2022年人口与健康调查(DHS)的估计进行了比较。使用耙法调整了与手机有关的死亡率。结果:结合怀孕史的移动电话访谈得出的近期儿童死亡率与国土安全部报告的相当。COMSA电话样本的2020-2021年u5mr估计为59.3(95%置信区间[95% CI]: 41.9-76.7), RDD样本的u5mr估计为44.9 (95% CI: 9.0-80.7),而DHS样本的u5mr估计为59.6 (95% CI: 53.7-65.6)。这些估计低于联合国预测的71.6 (95% CI: 65.5-87.1)和COMSA预测的80.0 (95% CI: 69.0-91.0)。我们观察到NMR和IMR的类似趋势。儿童死亡率趋势在COMSA电话样本和国土安全部样本之间具有可比性。相反,与其他样本相比,RDD样本似乎一直低估了儿童死亡率。结论:手机调查,包括标准的完整妊娠史工具,得出了国家和国家以下各级最近的儿童死亡率水平和趋势,类似于面对面的方法,如国土安全部。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Tropical Medicine & International Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
129
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Tropical Medicine & International Health is published on behalf of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Foundation Tropical Medicine and International Health, Belgian Institute of Tropical Medicine and Bernhard-Nocht-Institute for Tropical Medicine. Tropical Medicine & International Health is the official journal of the Federation of European Societies for Tropical Medicine and International Health (FESTMIH).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信