Use of Routine Health Data to Monitor Malaria Intervention Effectiveness: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tropical Medicine & International Health Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-24 DOI:10.1111/tmi.70015
Richard Reithinger, Donal Bisanzio, Anya Cushnie, Jessica Craig
{"title":"Use of Routine Health Data to Monitor Malaria Intervention Effectiveness: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Richard Reithinger, Donal Bisanzio, Anya Cushnie, Jessica Craig","doi":"10.1111/tmi.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The expansive scale-up of malaria interventions resulted in substantial reductions in malaria morbidity and mortality in the past 20 years. Intervention effectiveness has traditionally been estimated through research studies and trials, nationally representative surveys, and mathematical modelling. Because of their sheer volume across space and time, data reported routinely through health management information systems can complement and even offer an alternative to surveys and modelling to assess intervention effectiveness, and ultimately impact on health outcomes. This scoping review describes the different analytical approaches for estimating the effectiveness of malaria interventions using routine health management information systems data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined PubMed using combination searches of the following terms: 'malaria' AND 'intervention' AND 'effect*' OR 'impact' AND 'system' OR 'surveillance'. Other key terms such as 'routine' or 'information systems' were not included in the search strategy to have a more comprehensive search and were used during abstract and full text screening. We limited inclusion to studies and analyses that were conducted in the past decade, as that is when countries' routine health management information systems began to substantially mature, with data reported by these systems progressively becoming more robust.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 957 records generated from the PubMed search, following title and abstract screening, 93 were included for full-text review, with 49 records ultimately meeting the inclusion criteria for the scoping review. We summarise included studies by publication year, geography, outcome variables, target populations, interventions assessed, health management information systems data platform used-broadly, analytical approaches used a range of modelling or non-modelling approaches to assess intervention effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scoping review shows that routine health management information systems data can be used to regularly assess the effectiveness of various malaria interventions-an important exercise to ensure that implemented interventions continue to be effective, have the desired effect, and ultimately help countries progress towards their national strategic goals and targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":23962,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Medicine & International Health","volume":" ","pages":"1025-1052"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Medicine & International Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.70015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The expansive scale-up of malaria interventions resulted in substantial reductions in malaria morbidity and mortality in the past 20 years. Intervention effectiveness has traditionally been estimated through research studies and trials, nationally representative surveys, and mathematical modelling. Because of their sheer volume across space and time, data reported routinely through health management information systems can complement and even offer an alternative to surveys and modelling to assess intervention effectiveness, and ultimately impact on health outcomes. This scoping review describes the different analytical approaches for estimating the effectiveness of malaria interventions using routine health management information systems data.

Methods: We examined PubMed using combination searches of the following terms: 'malaria' AND 'intervention' AND 'effect*' OR 'impact' AND 'system' OR 'surveillance'. Other key terms such as 'routine' or 'information systems' were not included in the search strategy to have a more comprehensive search and were used during abstract and full text screening. We limited inclusion to studies and analyses that were conducted in the past decade, as that is when countries' routine health management information systems began to substantially mature, with data reported by these systems progressively becoming more robust.

Results: Out of 957 records generated from the PubMed search, following title and abstract screening, 93 were included for full-text review, with 49 records ultimately meeting the inclusion criteria for the scoping review. We summarise included studies by publication year, geography, outcome variables, target populations, interventions assessed, health management information systems data platform used-broadly, analytical approaches used a range of modelling or non-modelling approaches to assess intervention effectiveness.

Conclusion: This scoping review shows that routine health management information systems data can be used to regularly assess the effectiveness of various malaria interventions-an important exercise to ensure that implemented interventions continue to be effective, have the desired effect, and ultimately help countries progress towards their national strategic goals and targets.

使用常规卫生数据监测疟疾干预效果:范围审查。
背景:在过去20年中,疟疾干预措施的广泛扩大导致疟疾发病率和死亡率大幅下降。传统上,通过研究和试验、具有全国代表性的调查和数学模型来估计干预措施的有效性。由于其跨越空间和时间的庞大数量,通过卫生管理信息系统例行报告的数据可以补充甚至提供一种替代调查和建模的方法,以评估干预措施的有效性,并最终对卫生结果产生影响。本范围审查描述了利用常规卫生管理信息系统数据估计疟疾干预措施有效性的不同分析方法。方法:我们使用以下关键词组合搜索PubMed:“malaria”和“intervention”、“effect*”或“impact”和“system”或“surveillance”来检查PubMed。其他关键术语,如“常规”或“信息系统”没有包括在搜索策略中,以便进行更全面的搜索,而是在摘要和全文筛选中使用。我们将纳入范围限制在过去十年中进行的研究和分析,因为这是各国常规卫生管理信息系统开始基本成熟的时期,这些系统报告的数据逐渐变得更加可靠。结果:在PubMed检索产生的957条记录中,经过标题和摘要筛选,有93条记录被纳入全文评审,其中49条记录最终符合范围评审的纳入标准。我们根据发表年份、地理位置、结果变量、目标人群、评估的干预措施、广泛使用的健康管理信息系统数据平台、使用一系列建模或非建模方法来评估干预有效性的分析方法,对纳入的研究进行了总结。结论:这一范围审查表明,常规卫生管理信息系统数据可用于定期评估各种疟疾干预措施的有效性,这是确保实施的干预措施继续有效、产生预期效果并最终帮助各国实现其国家战略目标和具体目标的一项重要工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Tropical Medicine & International Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
129
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Tropical Medicine & International Health is published on behalf of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Foundation Tropical Medicine and International Health, Belgian Institute of Tropical Medicine and Bernhard-Nocht-Institute for Tropical Medicine. Tropical Medicine & International Health is the official journal of the Federation of European Societies for Tropical Medicine and International Health (FESTMIH).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信