Jaime O Herrera-Caceres, Marian Wettstein, Surena F Matin, Craig Labbate, Aaron Potretzke, Rodrigo Rodriguez, Nirmish Singla, Maximilian Pallauf, William Huang, Shavy Nagpal, Nir Kleinmann, Asaf Shvero, Alexander Small, Benjamin Green, Jennifer Linehan, Jane Choe, Ojas Shah, Arun Rai, Hristos Kaimakliotis, Isamu Tachibana, David Canes, Aaron Perecman, Jay D Raman
{"title":"Outcomes of endoscopic management for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A multi-center international cohort analysis.","authors":"Jaime O Herrera-Caceres, Marian Wettstein, Surena F Matin, Craig Labbate, Aaron Potretzke, Rodrigo Rodriguez, Nirmish Singla, Maximilian Pallauf, William Huang, Shavy Nagpal, Nir Kleinmann, Asaf Shvero, Alexander Small, Benjamin Green, Jennifer Linehan, Jane Choe, Ojas Shah, Arun Rai, Hristos Kaimakliotis, Isamu Tachibana, David Canes, Aaron Perecman, Jay D Raman","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.07.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with significant morbidity, often requiring radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) as the standard of care. Endoscopic ablation has emerged as a kidney-sparing alternative, particularly for low-risk UTUC. Given the rarity of UTUC, generating high-quality evidence for treatment strategies remains challenging. This study presents a large, multi-institutional analysis of outcomes following primary endoscopic ablation for UTUC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 432 patients across 11 institutions who underwent first-time endoscopic treatment for UTUC with curative intent between December 2003 and January 2023 was performed. Baseline demographics, tumor characteristics, and procedural details were collected. Recurrence was categorized as ipsilateral, distant, or bladder recurrence, with overall survival (OS) as the primary outcome. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to identify predictors of recurrence and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a median follow-up of 21 months, ipsilateral recurrence occurred in 232 patients (54%), while 55 (13%) developed distant metastases. The OS rate was 86%, with 29 patients (6.7%) dying within the first 12 months. On univariate analysis, the presence of a tumor not involving the renal pelvis (HR 0.71, P = 0.04) and use of a ureteral access sheath (UAS) (HR 0.65, P = 0.03) were associated with lower ipsilateral recurrence rates. On multivariate analysis, only UAS use remained significant (HR 0.39, P < 0.01). High-grade tumors were significantly associated with poorer OS (HR 3.59, P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endoscopic ablation is a feasible kidney-sparing alternative for UTUC. Ipsilateral recurrence rate is approximately 50% with over 10% of patients developing metastatic disease. UAS use may reduce UTUC recurrence risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.07.015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with significant morbidity, often requiring radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) as the standard of care. Endoscopic ablation has emerged as a kidney-sparing alternative, particularly for low-risk UTUC. Given the rarity of UTUC, generating high-quality evidence for treatment strategies remains challenging. This study presents a large, multi-institutional analysis of outcomes following primary endoscopic ablation for UTUC.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of 432 patients across 11 institutions who underwent first-time endoscopic treatment for UTUC with curative intent between December 2003 and January 2023 was performed. Baseline demographics, tumor characteristics, and procedural details were collected. Recurrence was categorized as ipsilateral, distant, or bladder recurrence, with overall survival (OS) as the primary outcome. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to identify predictors of recurrence and survival.
Results: At a median follow-up of 21 months, ipsilateral recurrence occurred in 232 patients (54%), while 55 (13%) developed distant metastases. The OS rate was 86%, with 29 patients (6.7%) dying within the first 12 months. On univariate analysis, the presence of a tumor not involving the renal pelvis (HR 0.71, P = 0.04) and use of a ureteral access sheath (UAS) (HR 0.65, P = 0.03) were associated with lower ipsilateral recurrence rates. On multivariate analysis, only UAS use remained significant (HR 0.39, P < 0.01). High-grade tumors were significantly associated with poorer OS (HR 3.59, P < 0.01).
Conclusions: Endoscopic ablation is a feasible kidney-sparing alternative for UTUC. Ipsilateral recurrence rate is approximately 50% with over 10% of patients developing metastatic disease. UAS use may reduce UTUC recurrence risk.
简介:上尿路上皮癌(UTUC)是一种罕见的侵袭性恶性肿瘤,发病率高,通常需要根治性肾输尿管切除术(RNU)作为标准治疗。内镜消融已成为一种保留肾脏的替代方法,特别是对于低风险的UTUC。鉴于UTUC的罕见性,为治疗策略提供高质量的证据仍然具有挑战性。本研究对UTUC初次内镜消融后的结果进行了大型、多机构的分析。方法:回顾性分析2003年12月至2023年1月间11家医院首次内镜治疗UTUC的432例患者。收集基线人口统计学、肿瘤特征和手术细节。复发分为同侧复发、远处复发或膀胱复发,以总生存期(OS)为主要终点。使用单因素和多因素Cox回归模型来确定复发和生存的预测因素。结果:在21个月的中位随访中,232例患者(54%)发生同侧复发,55例(13%)发生远处转移。总生存率为86%,29例(6.7%)患者在前12个月内死亡。在单因素分析中,未累及肾盂的肿瘤(HR 0.71, P = 0.04)和输尿管通路鞘(HR 0.65, P = 0.03)与较低的同侧复发率相关。在多变量分析中,只有UAS的使用仍然显著(HR 0.39, P < 0.01)。高级别肿瘤与较差的OS显著相关(HR 3.59, P < 0.01)。结论:内镜下消融术是一种可行的保肾方法。同侧复发率约为50%,超过10%的患者发展为转移性疾病。使用UAS可降低UTUC复发风险。
期刊介绍:
Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.