Disparities in radiation treatment modality for prostate cancer.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Mitchell Alameddine, Shan Wu, Oluwaseun Orikogbo, Danielle Sharbaugh, Jonathan G Yabes, Daisy Obiora, Michael G Stencel, Benjamin J Davies, Lindsay M Sabik, Bruce L Jacobs
{"title":"Disparities in radiation treatment modality for prostate cancer.","authors":"Mitchell Alameddine, Shan Wu, Oluwaseun Orikogbo, Danielle Sharbaugh, Jonathan G Yabes, Daisy Obiora, Michael G Stencel, Benjamin J Davies, Lindsay M Sabik, Bruce L Jacobs","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.07.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) are 2 common radiation treatment options used for prostate cancer therapy. SBRT has increased in use over the past decade. Factors associated with the uptake of this relatively novel therapy in prostate cancer patients are poorly understood. We attempted to characterize the choice of radiation therapy to help elucidate factors contributing to different treatment decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied 1,624 prostate cancer patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2017 in the SEER-Medicare dataset who were treated with SBRT or IMRT at networks offering SBRT. Our analysis focused on White or Black patients with localized prostate cancer. We analyzed patient demographics and compared median times from diagnosis to treatment using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified clinical and demographic factors associated with SBRT use compared to IMRT. On multivariable logistic regression, Black race was associated with decreased odds of receiving SBRT compared to White race (OR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2-0.7). Hispanic compared to non-Hispanic ethnicity was associated with decreased odds of receiving SBRT (OR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2-0.9). Patients living in a county with a population less than 250,000 people were more likely to receive SBRT compared to patients living in populous counties (OR: 3.6; 95% CI: 1.7-7.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients from the SEER-Medicare dataset from 2008 to 2017 treated with radiation for clinically localized prostate cancer, disparities exist in the choice of treatment modality. Understanding differences in treatment patterns is an important area to guide intervention as SBRT becomes available nationwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.07.033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) are 2 common radiation treatment options used for prostate cancer therapy. SBRT has increased in use over the past decade. Factors associated with the uptake of this relatively novel therapy in prostate cancer patients are poorly understood. We attempted to characterize the choice of radiation therapy to help elucidate factors contributing to different treatment decisions.

Methods: We studied 1,624 prostate cancer patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2017 in the SEER-Medicare dataset who were treated with SBRT or IMRT at networks offering SBRT. Our analysis focused on White or Black patients with localized prostate cancer. We analyzed patient demographics and compared median times from diagnosis to treatment using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

Results: We identified clinical and demographic factors associated with SBRT use compared to IMRT. On multivariable logistic regression, Black race was associated with decreased odds of receiving SBRT compared to White race (OR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2-0.7). Hispanic compared to non-Hispanic ethnicity was associated with decreased odds of receiving SBRT (OR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2-0.9). Patients living in a county with a population less than 250,000 people were more likely to receive SBRT compared to patients living in populous counties (OR: 3.6; 95% CI: 1.7-7.7).

Conclusions: Among patients from the SEER-Medicare dataset from 2008 to 2017 treated with radiation for clinically localized prostate cancer, disparities exist in the choice of treatment modality. Understanding differences in treatment patterns is an important area to guide intervention as SBRT becomes available nationwide.

前列腺癌放射治疗方式的差异。
介绍和目的:立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)和调强放射治疗(IMRT)是前列腺癌治疗中常用的两种放射治疗方案。在过去十年中,SBRT的使用有所增加。与前列腺癌患者接受这种相对新颖的治疗相关的因素尚不清楚。我们试图描述放射治疗的选择,以帮助阐明影响不同治疗决策的因素。方法:我们研究了2008年至2017年间在SEER-Medicare数据集中诊断的1,624名前列腺癌患者,这些患者在提供SBRT的网络中接受了SBRT或IMRT治疗。我们的分析集中在患有局限性前列腺癌的白人或黑人患者。我们分析了患者的人口统计学特征,并使用Wilcoxon秩和检验比较了从诊断到治疗的中位时间。结果:与IMRT相比,我们确定了与SBRT使用相关的临床和人口因素。在多变量logistic回归中,与白人相比,黑人与接受SBRT的几率降低相关(OR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2-0.7)。西班牙裔与非西班牙裔相比,接受SBRT的几率降低(OR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2-0.9)。生活在人口少于25万的县的患者比生活在人口稠密县的患者更有可能接受SBRT (OR: 3.6; 95% CI: 1.7-7.7)。结论:在2008年至2017年SEER-Medicare数据集中接受放射治疗的临床局限性前列腺癌患者中,治疗方式的选择存在差异。随着SBRT在全国范围内普及,了解治疗模式的差异是指导干预的重要领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信