{"title":"Impact of the preoperative modified 5-item frailty index on the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer.","authors":"Keisuke Goto, Yuki Kohada, Kohei Kobatake, Ryo Tasaka, Hideo Iwamoto, Takeshi Ueno, Akira Fujita, Tomoki Furutani, Kunihiro Hashimoto, Yoshimasa Kurimura, Kosuke Akiyama, Kensuke Nishida, Tetsutaro Hayashi, Nobuyuki Hinata","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.07.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to determine the optimal treatment strategy for MIBC patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy. We investigated whether preoperative frailty influences the efficacy of NAC by evaluating the Modified 5-item Frailty Index (mFI-5), which was developed as a comprehensive geriatric evaluation tool with a reduced number of variables to simplify data collection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 356 MIBC patients. Clinical information was collected retrospectively from medical records. Preoperative frailty was evaluated according to the mFI-5 score, and associations between NAC and clinical outcomes were investigated. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox proportional hazard model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who received NAC had significantly lower mFI-5 scores (P = 0.021) than those who did not. Although the preoperative mFI-5 score had a minor impact on other clinicopathological parameters, a significant difference in OS was found between patients mFI-5-low and mFI-5-high groups (P = 0.036). Furthermore, NAC significantly improved OS, especially in patients in the mFI-5-low group (P = 0.007), whereas no significant difference was found in patients in the mFI-5-high group. In patients who received NAC, the eGFR (HR=2.12, P = 0.024), pT stage (HR=2.29, P = 0.017), pN stage (HR=2.14, P = 0.044), and mFI-5 score (HR=2.23, P = 0.020) were independent predictors of OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients who received NAC, the preoperative mFI-5 score and renal function were significantly associated with OS. Preoperative frailty, as evaluated by the mFI-5, might be an important factor for determining the indications for NAC in MIBC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.07.029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to determine the optimal treatment strategy for MIBC patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy. We investigated whether preoperative frailty influences the efficacy of NAC by evaluating the Modified 5-item Frailty Index (mFI-5), which was developed as a comprehensive geriatric evaluation tool with a reduced number of variables to simplify data collection.
Methods: This retrospective study included 356 MIBC patients. Clinical information was collected retrospectively from medical records. Preoperative frailty was evaluated according to the mFI-5 score, and associations between NAC and clinical outcomes were investigated. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox proportional hazard model.
Results: Patients who received NAC had significantly lower mFI-5 scores (P = 0.021) than those who did not. Although the preoperative mFI-5 score had a minor impact on other clinicopathological parameters, a significant difference in OS was found between patients mFI-5-low and mFI-5-high groups (P = 0.036). Furthermore, NAC significantly improved OS, especially in patients in the mFI-5-low group (P = 0.007), whereas no significant difference was found in patients in the mFI-5-high group. In patients who received NAC, the eGFR (HR=2.12, P = 0.024), pT stage (HR=2.29, P = 0.017), pN stage (HR=2.14, P = 0.044), and mFI-5 score (HR=2.23, P = 0.020) were independent predictors of OS.
Conclusion: In patients who received NAC, the preoperative mFI-5 score and renal function were significantly associated with OS. Preoperative frailty, as evaluated by the mFI-5, might be an important factor for determining the indications for NAC in MIBC patients.
期刊介绍:
Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.