Delphi Study on the creation of a Committee of patients, caregivers, and representatives of patient associations.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Tumori Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-30 DOI:10.1177/03008916251346564
Laura Gangeri, Sara Alfieri, Valeria Anselmi, Bianca Scacciati, Elena Germini, Silvia Bernardelli, Cinzia Brunelli, Claudia Borreani
{"title":"Delphi Study on the creation of a Committee of patients, caregivers, and representatives of patient associations.","authors":"Laura Gangeri, Sara Alfieri, Valeria Anselmi, Bianca Scacciati, Elena Germini, Silvia Bernardelli, Cinzia Brunelli, Claudia Borreani","doi":"10.1177/03008916251346564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As part of the improvement plan of the Organisation of European Cancer Institutes at the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori of Milan (INT) a Committee composed of patients, caregivers, and representatives of patient associations has been established to actively participate in the planning and organization of both hospital services and research initiatives. The potential impact of implementation of the Committee could ensure a patient-centered care environment.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine whether there is consensus among INT staff on key aspects of the Committee.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Selected INT staff (experts) were invited to participate in a Delphi study. Each expert was asked to rate their agreement on 13 statements and give a brief explanation for their answers. Only the statements that failed to reach an 80% consensus were reintroduced in the second round, following the same procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety experts responded to Round I (55.21% response rate). Eight statements reached the 80% consensus threshold, while five did not meet the predefined threshold and were therefore re-proposed in the second round. These statements concerned the Committee's role (advisory vs decision-making), the perceived value of the Committee in research (improvement vs no involvement), and participant compensation (voluntary vs paid). In Round II, 69 experts participated (79.31% response rate), but none of the reintroduced statements reached the required consensus threshold.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although a Committee is a topic of theoretical interest and aligns with respondents' values, the establishment of a Committee in INT is currently difficult to implement. Training and awareness initiatives are necessary, as requested by respondents.</p>","PeriodicalId":23349,"journal":{"name":"Tumori","volume":" ","pages":"379-389"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476480/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tumori","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03008916251346564","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As part of the improvement plan of the Organisation of European Cancer Institutes at the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori of Milan (INT) a Committee composed of patients, caregivers, and representatives of patient associations has been established to actively participate in the planning and organization of both hospital services and research initiatives. The potential impact of implementation of the Committee could ensure a patient-centered care environment.

Aim: To determine whether there is consensus among INT staff on key aspects of the Committee.

Method: Selected INT staff (experts) were invited to participate in a Delphi study. Each expert was asked to rate their agreement on 13 statements and give a brief explanation for their answers. Only the statements that failed to reach an 80% consensus were reintroduced in the second round, following the same procedures.

Results: Ninety experts responded to Round I (55.21% response rate). Eight statements reached the 80% consensus threshold, while five did not meet the predefined threshold and were therefore re-proposed in the second round. These statements concerned the Committee's role (advisory vs decision-making), the perceived value of the Committee in research (improvement vs no involvement), and participant compensation (voluntary vs paid). In Round II, 69 experts participated (79.31% response rate), but none of the reintroduced statements reached the required consensus threshold.

Conclusion: Although a Committee is a topic of theoretical interest and aligns with respondents' values, the establishment of a Committee in INT is currently difficult to implement. Training and awareness initiatives are necessary, as requested by respondents.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

德尔菲研究关于建立一个由患者、护理人员和患者协会代表组成的委员会。
背景:作为米兰国家肿瘤研究所基金会欧洲癌症研究所组织改进计划的一部分,成立了一个由患者、护理人员和患者协会代表组成的委员会,以积极参与医院服务和研究倡议的规划和组织。执行该委员会的潜在影响可以确保一个以病人为中心的护理环境。目的:确定INT工作人员是否就委员会的关键方面达成共识。方法:邀请选定的INT工作人员(专家)参加德尔菲研究。每位专家被要求对13个陈述的同意程度进行评分,并对他们的答案进行简要解释。按照同样的程序,只有未能达到80%共识的声明才会在第二轮中重新引入。结果:第一轮有90位专家应答,应答率为55.21%。有8项声明达到80%的共识阈值,5项声明未达到预定阈值,因此在第二轮中重新提出。这些发言涉及委员会的作用(咨询vs决策)、委员会在研究中的感知价值(改进vs不参与)和参与者报酬(自愿vs有偿)。在第二轮,69位专家参与(79.31%的回复率),但没有一个重新引入的陈述达到所需的共识阈值。结论:虽然委员会是一个理论上感兴趣的话题,并且与受访者的价值观一致,但在INT中建立委员会目前很难实施。应答复者的要求,培训和提高认识举措是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tumori
Tumori 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Tumori Journal covers all aspects of cancer science and clinical practice with a strong focus on prevention, translational medicine and clinically relevant reports. We invite the publication of randomized trials and reports on large, consecutive patient series that investigate the real impact of new techniques, drugs and devices inday-to-day clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信