Study protocol: COPD-eosinophil-guided reduction of inhaled corticosteroids (COPERNICOS) : A randomized, double-blinded, multicenter, four-arm intervention clinical trial on eosinophil-guided time-updated person-specific reduction of inhaled corticosteroid therapy and prophylactic low dose Azithromycin therapy in patients with severe or very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2025-09-02 DOI:10.1186/s13063-025-09032-0
Christian Rønn, Barbara Bonnesen, Imane Achir Alispahic, Louise Lindhardt Tønnesen, Jakob Lyngby Kjærgaard, Mia Moberg, Charlotte Suppli Ulrik, Zitta Barrella Harboe, Andrea Browatzki, Torben Tranborg Jensen, Christian N Meyer, Uffe Bodtger, Elisabeth Bendstrup, Sofie Lock Johansson, Diana Utech Kaiser, Charlotte Hyldgaard, Jørgen Vestbo, Pradeesh Sivapalan, Jens-Ulrik Stæhr Jensen
{"title":"Study protocol: COPD-eosinophil-guided reduction of inhaled corticosteroids (COPERNICOS) : A randomized, double-blinded, multicenter, four-arm intervention clinical trial on eosinophil-guided time-updated person-specific reduction of inhaled corticosteroid therapy and prophylactic low dose Azithromycin therapy in patients with severe or very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).","authors":"Christian Rønn, Barbara Bonnesen, Imane Achir Alispahic, Louise Lindhardt Tønnesen, Jakob Lyngby Kjærgaard, Mia Moberg, Charlotte Suppli Ulrik, Zitta Barrella Harboe, Andrea Browatzki, Torben Tranborg Jensen, Christian N Meyer, Uffe Bodtger, Elisabeth Bendstrup, Sofie Lock Johansson, Diana Utech Kaiser, Charlotte Hyldgaard, Jørgen Vestbo, Pradeesh Sivapalan, Jens-Ulrik Stæhr Jensen","doi":"10.1186/s13063-025-09032-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) is frequently used for COPD. Based on the considerable adverse effects and the knowledge that many such patients do not gain benefit from this treatment, it remains unresolved whether ICS treatment can be managed with lower doses, or via an ICS-sparing strategy with periods with and without this medicine. The blood eosinophil count is a useful biomarker for steroid-responsive airway inflammation, and we want to investigate whether an individualized and eosinophil-guided approach on ICS treatment reduces ICS over-treatment and side effects. High-dose (500 mg thrice weekly or 250 mg daily) long-term azithromycin has been shown to reduce acute exacerbations of COPD in selected patients. Frequent gastro-intestinal adverse effects remain a challenge, but many patients tolerate lower doses; however, the effect of the treatment at lower doses is unknown, although many physicians prefer such doses. We want to investigate whether oral low-dose prophylactic azithromycin 250 mg three times weekly reduces acute exacerbations of COPD and improves time alive and out of hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an ongoing, actively recruiting randomized, double-blinded, multicenter, four-arm factorial intervention clinical trial aiming to recruit 444 patients with specialist verified COPD GOLD risk class E and/or FEV1 < 30% who are currently on ICS. The patients are followed for one year and are randomized 1:1:1:1 to one of the four treatment arms: (1) eosinophil-guided ICS-sparing treatment and low-dose azithromycin, (2) eosinophil-guided ICS treatment and placebo, (3) continued ICS treatment and low-dose azithromycin, or (4) continued ICS treatment and placebo. If blood-eosinophils (measured every 3 months) are < 0.3 × 10<sup>9</sup> cells/L, ICS treatment will be paused in the arms with eosinophil-guided ICS-sparing treatment. Azithromycin/placebo is double-blinded and administered three times weekly. The primary endpoint is the number of hospitalization-requiring COPD exacerbations and/or death within 365 days.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Severe ICS-adverse effects like bacterial infections should be reduced. The ICS-sparing intervention, we test, may provide a useful tool to do this safely. Azithromycin low-dose prophylaxis is practiced by many physicians. This trial will provide evidence of whether this is effective.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinTrials.gov. NCT04481555. Registered on 14 AUG 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04481555 .</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"26 1","pages":"335"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12403334/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09032-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) is frequently used for COPD. Based on the considerable adverse effects and the knowledge that many such patients do not gain benefit from this treatment, it remains unresolved whether ICS treatment can be managed with lower doses, or via an ICS-sparing strategy with periods with and without this medicine. The blood eosinophil count is a useful biomarker for steroid-responsive airway inflammation, and we want to investigate whether an individualized and eosinophil-guided approach on ICS treatment reduces ICS over-treatment and side effects. High-dose (500 mg thrice weekly or 250 mg daily) long-term azithromycin has been shown to reduce acute exacerbations of COPD in selected patients. Frequent gastro-intestinal adverse effects remain a challenge, but many patients tolerate lower doses; however, the effect of the treatment at lower doses is unknown, although many physicians prefer such doses. We want to investigate whether oral low-dose prophylactic azithromycin 250 mg three times weekly reduces acute exacerbations of COPD and improves time alive and out of hospital.

Methods: This is an ongoing, actively recruiting randomized, double-blinded, multicenter, four-arm factorial intervention clinical trial aiming to recruit 444 patients with specialist verified COPD GOLD risk class E and/or FEV1 < 30% who are currently on ICS. The patients are followed for one year and are randomized 1:1:1:1 to one of the four treatment arms: (1) eosinophil-guided ICS-sparing treatment and low-dose azithromycin, (2) eosinophil-guided ICS treatment and placebo, (3) continued ICS treatment and low-dose azithromycin, or (4) continued ICS treatment and placebo. If blood-eosinophils (measured every 3 months) are < 0.3 × 109 cells/L, ICS treatment will be paused in the arms with eosinophil-guided ICS-sparing treatment. Azithromycin/placebo is double-blinded and administered three times weekly. The primary endpoint is the number of hospitalization-requiring COPD exacerbations and/or death within 365 days.

Discussion: Severe ICS-adverse effects like bacterial infections should be reduced. The ICS-sparing intervention, we test, may provide a useful tool to do this safely. Azithromycin low-dose prophylaxis is practiced by many physicians. This trial will provide evidence of whether this is effective.

Trial registration: ClinTrials.gov. NCT04481555. Registered on 14 AUG 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04481555 .

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

研究方案:COPD-嗜酸性粒细胞引导下减少吸入皮质类固醇(COPERNICOS):一项随机、双盲、多中心、四组干预临床试验,研究重度或极重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者嗜酸性粒细胞引导下时间更新的个人特异性减少吸入皮质类固醇治疗和预防性低剂量阿奇霉素治疗。
背景:吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)常用于慢性阻塞性肺病。基于相当大的不良反应和许多此类患者没有从这种治疗中获益的认识,ICS治疗是否可以用较低剂量进行管理,或者在使用和不使用这种药物的期间通过ICS节省策略进行管理,目前仍未解决。血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数是类固醇反应性气道炎症的有用生物标志物,我们希望研究个体化和嗜酸性粒细胞引导的ICS治疗方法是否可以减少ICS过度治疗和副作用。高剂量(500mg,每周3次或250mg,每天)长期阿奇霉素已被证明可减少特定患者的慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重。频繁的胃肠道不良反应仍然是一个挑战,但许多患者耐受较低剂量;然而,低剂量治疗的效果尚不清楚,尽管许多医生更喜欢这样的剂量。我们想研究口服低剂量预防性阿奇霉素250mg,每周3次是否能减少慢性阻塞性肺病的急性加重,并延长存活和出院时间。方法:这是一项正在进行的、积极招募的随机、双盲、多中心、四组因素干预临床试验,旨在招募444名专家验证COPD GOLD风险等级为E级和/或fev19细胞/L的患者,在嗜酸性粒细胞引导的ICS保留治疗组中,ICS治疗将暂停。阿奇霉素/安慰剂双盲,每周给药三次。主要终点是365天内需要住院治疗的COPD恶化和/或死亡的数量。讨论:应减少严重的ics不良反应,如细菌感染。我们测试了保留ics的干预措施,可以提供一种安全的有效工具。许多医生都采用低剂量阿奇霉素预防。这项试验将提供证据证明这是否有效。试验注册:ClinTrials.gov。NCT04481555。2020年8月14日注册,https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04481555。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信