Total Payments and Out-of-Pocket Expenses for Surgical Hand Trauma Episodes.

Q2 Social Sciences
Jessica I Billig, Yixin Tang, Michael Wu, Luyu Xie, Joshua M Liao
{"title":"Total Payments and Out-of-Pocket Expenses for Surgical Hand Trauma Episodes.","authors":"Jessica I Billig, Yixin Tang, Michael Wu, Luyu Xie, Joshua M Liao","doi":"10.7812/TPP/24.196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Insight about episode spending after elective procedures has driven interest in bundling reimbursement for surgical procedures. However, little is known about episode spending for health systems (payments) and patients (out-of-pocket [OOP] expenses) after unplanned, nonelective procedures such as hand trauma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors used 2019-2022 national claims to conduct a cohort study of patients undergoing flexor tendon repair, open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of a distal radius fracture, and replantation/revascularization. The authors constructed 90-day episodes spanning surgical procedures and postoperative care. The authors calculated episode spending from the perspectives of the health system (payments) and patients (OOP expenses). Multivariable regression models were used to examine the association between patient characteristics and spending.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 21,753 patients, 90-day postoperative spending varied by procedure type. Median payment was $14,263 for ORIF of distal radius fractures, $11,541 for flexor tendon repairs, and $25,700 for revascularization/replantation. Compared to ORIF of distal radius fractures, flexor tendon repairs were associated with 18% lower payments (cost ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-0.83), while revascularization/replantation was associated with 7% lower payments (cost ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90-0.97). Patients with at least one comorbidity had 4% greater payments compared to patients with no comorbidities (cost ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03-1.06). However, inpatient procedures were 388% more expensive than outpatient procedures (cost ratio, 3.77; 95% CI, 3.77-3.99). The authors also found variation in patient OOP expenses based on procedure type.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was heterogeneity in health system and patient spending after hand trauma due to procedure type. This highlighted that any future payment or practice redesign for hand trauma episodes should be stratified by procedure type.</p>","PeriodicalId":23037,"journal":{"name":"The Permanente journal","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Permanente journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/24.196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Insight about episode spending after elective procedures has driven interest in bundling reimbursement for surgical procedures. However, little is known about episode spending for health systems (payments) and patients (out-of-pocket [OOP] expenses) after unplanned, nonelective procedures such as hand trauma.

Methods: The authors used 2019-2022 national claims to conduct a cohort study of patients undergoing flexor tendon repair, open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of a distal radius fracture, and replantation/revascularization. The authors constructed 90-day episodes spanning surgical procedures and postoperative care. The authors calculated episode spending from the perspectives of the health system (payments) and patients (OOP expenses). Multivariable regression models were used to examine the association between patient characteristics and spending.

Results: Among 21,753 patients, 90-day postoperative spending varied by procedure type. Median payment was $14,263 for ORIF of distal radius fractures, $11,541 for flexor tendon repairs, and $25,700 for revascularization/replantation. Compared to ORIF of distal radius fractures, flexor tendon repairs were associated with 18% lower payments (cost ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-0.83), while revascularization/replantation was associated with 7% lower payments (cost ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90-0.97). Patients with at least one comorbidity had 4% greater payments compared to patients with no comorbidities (cost ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03-1.06). However, inpatient procedures were 388% more expensive than outpatient procedures (cost ratio, 3.77; 95% CI, 3.77-3.99). The authors also found variation in patient OOP expenses based on procedure type.

Conclusions: There was heterogeneity in health system and patient spending after hand trauma due to procedure type. This highlighted that any future payment or practice redesign for hand trauma episodes should be stratified by procedure type.

外科手部创伤事件的总支付和自付费用。
目的:对选择性手术后患者支出的了解促使人们对外科手术捆绑报销产生了兴趣。然而,在诸如手部创伤等计划外的非选择性手术后,对卫生系统(付款)和患者(自付费用)的插曲支出知之甚少。方法:作者使用2019-2022年国家声明对接受屈肌腱修复、桡骨远端骨折切开复位内固定(ORIF)和再植/血运重建术的患者进行队列研究。作者构建了90天的事件,包括手术过程和术后护理。作者从卫生系统(付款)和患者(OOP费用)的角度计算了插曲支出。使用多变量回归模型来检验患者特征与支出之间的关系。结果:在21,753例患者中,90天的术后花费因手术类型而异。桡骨远端骨折ORIF的平均费用为14,263美元,屈肌腱修复为11,541美元,血管重建术/再植为25,700美元。与桡骨远端骨折的ORIF相比,屈肌腱修复的费用降低了18%(成本比,0.82;95%可信区间[CI], 0.80-0.83),而血运重建术/再植的费用降低了7%(成本比,0.93;95% CI, 0.90-0.97)。至少有一种合并症的患者比没有合并症的患者多支付4%(成本比,1.04;95% CI, 1.03-1.06)。然而,住院治疗比门诊治疗要贵388%(成本比,3.77;95% CI, 3.77-3.99)。作者还发现,基于手术类型的患者OOP费用存在差异。结论:由于手术类型的不同,卫生系统和患者在手部创伤后的花费存在异质性。这强调,任何未来的支付或实践重新设计的手外伤事件应分层手术类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Permanente journal
The Permanente journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信